But one of the attorneys representing the 25
plaintiffs in the case who oppose the school voucher program, North Carolina Justice Center's Christine Bischoff, offered a different perspective.
Not exact matches
«A lawsuit opens the door, and judges almost always allow for a
plaintiff to have a fishing expedition,» said Robert S. Bennett, the Washington lawyer
who represented Mr. Clinton
in the Paula Jones
case.
«A lawsuit opens the door, and judges almost always allow for a
plaintiff to have a fishing expedition,» Robert Bennett,
who represented Clinton
in that
case, told the New York Times.
The
plaintiffs in the
case call for more transparency from Uber's new CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi,
who recently overhauled the company's values to include: «We do the right thing.
Can a line be drawn between the
plaintiffs in this
case and a majority of stockholders
in a publicly - traded corporation
who want their corporation to reflect some consensus religious belief?
Investor advocate, Mark Elliott —
who recently won a class action on behalf of investors
in Downer EDI — lodged the claim on behalf of investor John Webster,
who will act as «lead
plaintiff»
in the
case on behalf of other investors
who join the action.
In that case Gaidry, a manufacturer of a sauce labelled «Tabasco Pepper Sauce,» brought suit against McIlhenny Company for damages for alleged wrongful conduct in interfering with the plaintiff's business by falsely and in bad faith representing to dealers throughout the country that it had an exclusive trade - mark in the name «Tabasco,» and threatening injunction and other legal proceedings against those who handled any sauce called «Tabasco» not made by the said McIlhenny Compan
In that
case Gaidry, a manufacturer of a sauce labelled «Tabasco Pepper Sauce,» brought suit against McIlhenny Company for damages for alleged wrongful conduct
in interfering with the plaintiff's business by falsely and in bad faith representing to dealers throughout the country that it had an exclusive trade - mark in the name «Tabasco,» and threatening injunction and other legal proceedings against those who handled any sauce called «Tabasco» not made by the said McIlhenny Compan
in interfering with the
plaintiff's business by falsely and
in bad faith representing to dealers throughout the country that it had an exclusive trade - mark in the name «Tabasco,» and threatening injunction and other legal proceedings against those who handled any sauce called «Tabasco» not made by the said McIlhenny Compan
in bad faith representing to dealers throughout the country that it had an exclusive trade - mark
in the name «Tabasco,» and threatening injunction and other legal proceedings against those who handled any sauce called «Tabasco» not made by the said McIlhenny Compan
in the name «Tabasco,» and threatening injunction and other legal proceedings against those
who handled any sauce called «Tabasco» not made by the said McIlhenny Company.
Judge Claudia Wilken,
who presided over the O'Bannon
case, issued an order declaring that the NCAA and some of the conferences will have to defend the rules against players receiving more than tuition, room and board (and now a cost - of - attendance stipend)
in open court
in a
case brought by a
plaintiff group that includes former Clemson cornerback Martin Jenkins and former Wisconsin forward Nigel Hayes.
There are also
cases of other law - enforcement agencies taking related actions, such as Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) arresting and deporting back an
in - coming witness or
plaintiff who has valid court papers and visa.
He is likely to side with the four justices
who were willing to rule with the
plaintiffs in the Friedrichs
case.
NYC Councilman Robert Jackson,
who chairs the Council Education Committee and is an original
plaintiff in the CFE
case, is going to lead a protest Saturday against record setting education aid cuts proposed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the rollback of the settlement payout.
Lasher is running against Marisol Alcantara, a former union organizer for the New York State Nurses Association, and Robert Jackson, a former councilman
who is also a
plaintiff in a landmark
case by the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, which argued that New York was under funding schools and not meeting its constitutional burden to provide children with a «sound basic education.»
In each case, lawyers for Emanuel Delacruz, who is blind, charged that the college's website is inaccessible to their plaintiff and therefore in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Ac
In each
case, lawyers for Emanuel Delacruz,
who is blind, charged that the college's website is inaccessible to their
plaintiff and therefore
in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Ac
in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
The
plaintiff in the Supreme Court
case is a familiar name
in New York political circles: Shaun McCutcheon, an Alabama businessman and Republican activist
who last year challenged New York's contribution limit to independent expenditure - only committees.
«If we allow this
case in this instance, not only will the federal court be making new law that is contrary to New York law, but it would be opening the floodgates (to) thousands and thousands and thousands, millions of
plaintiffs who have been exposed, (but)
who have no present injury.»
The judges hearing a suit challenging the constitutionality of the decision by former President John Mahama to pardon the three Montie FM personalities
who were jailed for contempt have criticised the
plaintiffs in the
case for delays
in presenting their
case.
For instance, a
plaintiff in the Supreme Court
case, Ellen T. Matloff of Yale Cancer Center, said that
in 2006 she knew of a patient
who had had breast and ovarian cancer
who tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2, suggesting that this patient's cancers were not the result of a hereditary condition, according to the New York Times.
The subscriber,
who is a co-defendant
in the
case, made sexual remarks during the chat, claimed to work for the nation's largest lingerie manufacturer, and told Davood that «she might have found her man
in the
plaintiff,» the suit states.
A second judge argued that the statute was even unconstitutional as applied to the particular
plaintiffs in this
case,
who included several defendants
who wished to publish swinger ads
in the magazine illustrated with sexually - explicit pictures but did not want to sacrifice their anonymity.
The fiery California atheist
who last week lost his bid at the U.S. Supreme Court to get «under God» stricken from the Pledge of Allegiance vows to continue the fight with new
plaintiffs, preferably
in cases against school districts all over the country.
The
plaintiffs in the
case, minority students
in California, had argued that California's teacher tenure system violates the equal protection clause because it protects teachers
who are ineffective, and poor and minority students are more likely to be assigned these ineffective teachers.
In 1969, the U.S. DOJ intervened for the plaintiffs who sued the state of Mississippi in Coffey v. State Educational Finance Commission.45 In the five years before the case made it to the Supreme Court, the state offered vouchers for students to exercise «individual freedom in choosing public or private school,» which provided them with the opportunity to choose to attend racially segregated schools.46 Originally only offering $ 180 per student in 1964, the state Legislature increased the amount of each voucher to be $ 240 per student in 1968.
In 1969, the U.S. DOJ intervened for the
plaintiffs who sued the state of Mississippi
in Coffey v. State Educational Finance Commission.45 In the five years before the case made it to the Supreme Court, the state offered vouchers for students to exercise «individual freedom in choosing public or private school,» which provided them with the opportunity to choose to attend racially segregated schools.46 Originally only offering $ 180 per student in 1964, the state Legislature increased the amount of each voucher to be $ 240 per student in 1968.
in Coffey v. State Educational Finance Commission.45
In the five years before the case made it to the Supreme Court, the state offered vouchers for students to exercise «individual freedom in choosing public or private school,» which provided them with the opportunity to choose to attend racially segregated schools.46 Originally only offering $ 180 per student in 1964, the state Legislature increased the amount of each voucher to be $ 240 per student in 1968.
In the five years before the
case made it to the Supreme Court, the state offered vouchers for students to exercise «individual freedom
in choosing public or private school,» which provided them with the opportunity to choose to attend racially segregated schools.46 Originally only offering $ 180 per student in 1964, the state Legislature increased the amount of each voucher to be $ 240 per student in 1968.
in choosing public or private school,» which provided them with the opportunity to choose to attend racially segregated schools.46 Originally only offering $ 180 per student
in 1964, the state Legislature increased the amount of each voucher to be $ 240 per student in 1968.
in 1964, the state Legislature increased the amount of each voucher to be $ 240 per student
in 1968.
in 1968.47
The
plaintiffs in this
case are proud union members
who are grateful for their union benefits.
The state education commissioner acknowledges the achievement gap, as does the attorney general and even Gov. Dannel Malloy,
who went from
plaintiff in the CCJEF lawsuit when he was mayor of Stamford to defendant
in the
case when he became governor
in 2011.
The
plaintiffs in the
case were nine California school children
who claimed that they were deprived of a quality of education by the application of the laws.
While the district withdrew as a defendant
in the
case before the trial started, she was called by the defense
in an effort to impeach the testimony of a
plaintiffs» witness, Nicholas Melvoin, a former LA Unified teacher at Markham Middle School
in Watts,
who had testified last month that teacher layoffs
in 2009 resulted
in effective teachers being dismissed and morale at the school eroded.
Los Angeles Unified parent Lauren Campbell has a child
plaintiff in the
case and said that even though efforts are underway to overhaul the evaluation system
in the district, it won't do much to protect effective, less - senior teachers
who she says she has seen get layoff notices year after year at Lanai Road Elementary School
in Encino.
Earlier
in the trial, one of the four student -
plaintiffs who testified
in the
case, Raylene Monterroza, described difficulties she had with McLoughlin, her eighth - grade English teacher.
The lead
plaintiff in the
case is Tiffini Forslund
who is backed by Bonnie Dominguez, Roxanne Draughn, Justina Person, and five of Minnesota's top attorneys.
Plaintiffs in the Robles
case are the California School Boards Association, the state PTA, the association of California School Administrators, the California Teachers Association, the Youth & Education Law Project at Stanford Law School and 60 individuals, including the lead
plaintiff, Maya Robles - Wong,
who was a junior at Alameda High School when the suits were filed.
When the CCJEF v. Rell school funding lawsuit was filed 11 years ago, Stamford Mayor Dannel Malloy was a
plaintiff in the
case, one of a number of local elected officials
who decried the fact that Connecticut's system of school funding was unfair, inadequate and unconstitutional.
As an aside, I also just happened across a press release announcing then that one of the
case's current star witnesses,
who was actually the first called to the stand by the
plaintiffs — Los Angeles Superintendent John Deasy — also starting
in 2009 served as the Gates Foundation's Deputy Director of Education.
The representative
plaintiff in the
case is Victoria resident Erin Sherry,
who wanted out of a CIBC (TSX: CM) mortgage when her marriage dissolved.
The
plaintiff in the
case was Mark Tetzlaff, 57, a man
who owed over $ 260,000
in student loans.
You might not have heard about it — but over the last few years there was a
case working its way through the court system that could have made it easier for student loans to be discharged.The
plaintiff in the
case was Mark Tetzlaff, 57, a man
who owed over $ 260,000
in student loans.
«This is the first time any
case for a banana worker has come before a U.S. court,» Duane Miller, one of the attorneys representing more than 30 Nicaraguan
plaintiffs who worked on plantations from 1964 to 1990, tells BusinessWeek.According to one upcoming lawsuit that was filed
in 2004, Dole Fresh Fruit Co. and Standard Fruit Co., now part of Dole, were not only negligent, but that they fraudulently concealed information about DBCP's effects.
Plaintiffs with commercial litigation
cases who are
in need of funding can turn to LexShares, which then reviews the
case for merit and, if it passes muster, puts out an offering for investors to buy.
Hollywood, Esq. reports that the
plaintiffs in the
case will be football players Nathaniel Claybrooks and Christopher Johnson,
who are both African - American men.
In King County Superior Court, a case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raqu
In King County Superior Court, a
case had to be stayed while a party sought new counsel after their attorney acknowledged that he falsified a memo and emails before turning them over to
plaintiffs in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan, in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raqu
in a nationwide class - action lawsuit.7 Similarly, this spring, U.S. District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan,
in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raqu
in a 500 - page opinion, blasted a legal team (
who previously had «won» a $ 19 billion judgment
in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.&raqu
in an Ecuadorean court) for their «egregious fraud» which included ghostwriting «independent reports.»
The decision (PDF),
in a
case brought by the American Bar Association — which I'm sure has been receiving thank - you notes from grateful solo practitioners
who now need not spend a lot of time drafting identity theft detection protocols — is worded fairly strongly
in favor of the
plaintiffs.
It is noteworthy that, as is often the
case, the third parties themselves do not appear to have participated
in the Quebec proceeding — instead it was the US
Plaintiff, Neptune,
who was opposing the Request.
Specifically, he asks, «When you are a defense counsel
in a civil
case who discovers that a
plaintiffs» claim is fraudulent, do you have a duty to disclose this to the trial court?»
In the classic
case of Robinson v. Lindsay, the Supreme Court of Washington held that a 13 - year - old minor child
who drove a snowmobile — and as a result caused the
plaintiff's finger to be severed — was to be held to an adult standard of care.
The
plaintiff,
who has the burden of proof
in any
case, will then put on his
case by presenting the sworn testimony of witnesses.
Dismissing the complaints of tort reformists
who argue that inflated jury verdicts
in medical - malpractice
cases are creating a crisis
in the insurance industry, Satin says any
plaintiffs» lawyer worth his salt knows that it doesn't pay to take on a bad
case hoping for a settlement.
Plaintiffs in this
case are major food manufacturers (including Kraft, Kellogg's, and General Mills)
who purchased egg products from egg supplier defendants.
The other
plaintiff, a 24 - year - old recent graduate of Harvard University
who will be known
in the
case as D.C., has been forcibly injected with medications.
In a personal injury case, the injured individual (the plaintiff) will seek to recover damages in the form of financial compensation from the individual (the defendant), who caused the injur
In a personal injury
case, the injured individual (the
plaintiff) will seek to recover damages
in the form of financial compensation from the individual (the defendant), who caused the injur
in the form of financial compensation from the individual (the defendant),
who caused the injury.
The Litigation Center actively works to develop legal principles that prevent forum shopping by
plaintiffs» lawyers
who attempt to game the system by bringing lawsuits
in venues with no connection to their
case.
On the facts of these appeals, it seems reasonable to infer that recognizing interest as an expense would lead to a transfer of resources between classes of parties
in which unsuccessful defendants are exposed to the risks of paying high interest rates designed to pay for the cost of lending money, not just to the successful party
in the
case but other
plaintiffs who receive financing but may not recover moneys to pay for their loans...