Not exact matches
During his career, Dr. Valencia has served as an expert witness for
plaintiffs of color
in a number of education lawsuits, most recently
in the 2006 federal - level Santamaria v. Dallas Independent School District segregation
case in which the
plaintiffs prevailed.
In order to receive a preliminary injunction, the
plaintiffs must show they are likely to
prevail on the merits of the
case.
At this point, our state government could have attempted real education finance reform, recognizing that
plaintiffs prevailed in around 70 percent of these
cases that have been brought nationally.
So the
plaintiffs in this
case need to either (a) show actual damages, or (b) convince the court under the applicable standard of proof that they will suffer damages and they are likely to
prevail on the merits of the
case, and possibly secure a bond for the losses to the defendants
in the meantime.
Since the high court's order was issued
in a proceeding that is ongoing, the
plaintiff's claim for damages may still
prevail, although he will be unable to prevent the defendant's proposed expert from performing a medical examination on him before the
case proceeds to trial.
On June 1, 2016, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Elihu M. Berle granted
plaintiff $ 659,759
in fees for
prevailing in a
case alleging that California's controller at the time illegally withheld automatic raises from 3,000 active and retired California judges.
A study commissioned by the American Constitution Society reveals that, based on data from 1979 to 2006,
plaintiffs who brought employment discrimination suits
in federal district courts
prevailed only 15 percent of the time, compared to 51 percent for non-employment related
cases.
Plaintiffs prevailed in nearly half (48 percent) of the tort
cases completed by trial
in 2002 - 2003.
The
plaintiffs prevailed and the TRO will remain
in effect while a broader court
case questioning the ultimate constitutionality or legality of the travel ban advances.
At the close of the
Plaintiff's evidence, Mr. Mavrick made a motion that his client should be deemed to
prevail in the
case because the evidence showed that the Defendant corporation had no liability
in the
case based on its legal defense.
In both
cases, the
plaintiff prevailed on the claim that the device was defective, but lost on the negligence claim.
If a jury
in a personal injury
case believes that there is a 51 to 100 percent chance that the defendant was negligent, the
plaintiff has met his or her burden of proof and will
prevail.
A
plaintiff that
prevails on a Lanham Act claim can obtain an injunction against the false or misleading advertising, as well as damages and,
in certain
cases, attorneys» fees.
The district judge held the City to its settlement agreement position that
plaintiff was to be deemed a
prevailing party, which was also shown by the excellent results obtained by her anyway
in a
case that was on the edge of trial.
Plaintiffs prevailed less frequently
in trials involving medical malpractice (37 %) or product liability (34 %) issues compared to motor vehicle accident
cases (57 %).
He has successfully defeated class certification motions and
prevailed on summary judgment
in class actions, as well as single
plaintiff cases.
PSW has
prevailed on behalf of
plaintiffs in all types of professional malpractice and fraud
cases, including:
In a defamation case, the plaintiff who was the subject of the false statements must prove the following things to prevail in their lawsui
In a defamation
case, the
plaintiff who was the subject of the false statements must prove the following things to
prevail in their lawsui
in their lawsuit:
The trial judge determined that, although
plaintiff did get affirmative recovery, the
plaintiff did not
prevail when all the circumstances were considered
in Fry v. Skinner,
Case No.
Maryland
plaintiffs prevailed in 83 % of auto accident personal injury
cases.
In contrast, plaintiffs prevailed in only 8 % of medical malpractice cases in Maryland (bearing in mind that most meritorious cases settle before trial) but the average jury award in health care error cases was $ 808,77
In contrast,
plaintiffs prevailed in only 8 % of medical malpractice cases in Maryland (bearing in mind that most meritorious cases settle before trial) but the average jury award in health care error cases was $ 808,77
in only 8 % of medical malpractice
cases in Maryland (bearing in mind that most meritorious cases settle before trial) but the average jury award in health care error cases was $ 808,77
in Maryland (bearing
in mind that most meritorious cases settle before trial) but the average jury award in health care error cases was $ 808,77
in mind that most meritorious
cases settle before trial) but the average jury award
in health care error cases was $ 808,77
in health care error
cases was $ 808,772.
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari from the Tenth Circuit's decision
in Marx v. General Revenue Corp., U.S. No. 11 - 1175, to determine whether a
prevailing defendant can be awarded routine costs (not attorney's fees) against a losing
plaintiff in a Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA)
case where the
plaintiff was found to have brought the suit
in good faith.
The
plaintiffs prevailed at trial
in this medical malpractice
case and recovered a judgment that requires the defendant to pay damages and interest calculated
[2] The
plaintiffs prevailed at trial
in this medical malpractice
case and recovered a judgment that requires the defendant to pay damages and interest calculated [2] to total $ 1,914,807.90.
In cases, however, when a 1983 claim is viable, it is a powerful tool since attorney's fees are awarded if
plaintiff prevails at all and the jury isn't aware of this.
The California Public Records Act (CPFA) has a fees / costs shifting provision
in Government Code section 6259 (d) which provides that the court shall award court costs and reasonable fees to the «
plaintiff» should the
plaintiff prevail in CPRA litigation and shall award court costs and reasonable fees to the public agency if the court find that the «
plaintiff's»
case is clearly frivolous.
In such
cases, a
prevailing plaintiff can often take the judgment to the review site, which will respond by removing the review.
We favor legislative proposals that shift fees
in patent troll
cases to a
prevailing defendant, and that the
plaintiff should be required to post a bond at the beginning of the
case.
Legislation should be passed that shifts fees
in patent troll
cases to a
prevailing defendant, and that the
plaintiff should be required to post a bond at the beginning of the
case.