Well, a lighter
plane uses less fuel and Nippon Airlines is hoping that it will equal a savings of roughly 5 tons in carbon emissions in just 30 days (or is it 31 days in October?).
Not exact matches
The report said Qantas recorded poor
fuel efficiency because it
used older,
fuel - intensive aircraft, carried a low amount of freight (therefore making it
less efficient) and also had relatively low numbers of passengers on each
plane.
One advantage is that composite - based
planes use significantly
less fuel.
Last year, All Nippon Airlines asked passengers to
use the lavatories before they board flights so as to reduce the overall weight of the
plane, which would ultimately be better for the environment as it would mean
less fuel usage.
On the other hand, Airbus's giant A380, which enters service this year, takes many more people between hubs than previous aircraft,
using less fuel per passenger than smaller
planes.
For all other
fuel uses, ranging from diesel
fuel for trucks and jet
fuel for
planes to home heating and industrial
fuels — the overall price - responsiveness is probably greater than for gasoline but
less than for electricity.
I fly Porter out of the Island, which
uses (so they say) relatively low - impact
planes, and much
less taxi time and
fuel for me, as I live and work downtown in Toronto.