Or maybe it's dimming because it devoured
a planet at some time in the past.
Not exact matches
In the past, researchers have described that the tilt of a planet's axis plays a key role in the climate cycles of a planet, assuring it's not too hot or too cold at any one tim
In the
past, researchers have described that the tilt of a
planet's axis plays a key role
in the climate cycles of a planet, assuring it's not too hot or too cold at any one tim
in the climate cycles of a
planet, assuring it's not too hot or too cold
at any one
time.
There have only been three coldhouse periods (i.e. with ice
at the poles)
in the
past 550 million years (the
time that multi-cell animal life has been thriving on the
planet) and we are
in the third one now.
«Only
planets in the first category (Earth, Mars, Venus) might be habitable now or might have been
at some
time in their
past, so those are the ones we are interested
in for the NExSS project.»
The emergence of exoplanet research, spurred by the breath - taking discovery of so many new
planets in the
past decade, is
at once tremendously exciting and
at the same
time unbelievably challenging, given the difficulty
in detecting and characterizing these
planets from so great a distance.»
The fundamental hypothesis is that
at some
time in the
past and over some unspecified
time - averaging period that on a whole -
planet basis radiative energy transport attained a state of equilibrium; out - going energy =
in - coming energy.
When global warming has happened
at various
times in the
past two million years, it has taken the
planet about 5,000 years to warm 5 degrees.