Not exact matches
This is OK when you can completely control the replicability of a situation (eg changing the CO2 in a glass bottle) but rather more difficult in the case of the planet you are living on, when the inferences have to be made on the basis of both what
happens in a glass bottle (physics) and what the observed behaviour of the unique subject (the
planetary climate system) has been in terms of recent observations and its geological history.
Now it's time to try and make sense of what actually
happened, who did what, and how the results will shape our troubled relationship with the
planetary climate.
I don't think all our efforts to get to greater understanding about what's going on in our
planetary climate are all good or all bad, but I do think a lot of decsions are heavily impacted by the public's perception and the image of the bear swimming to oblivion, if that's in fact what
happens, carries more weight than scientific objectivity.
more stories like this War and peace with the environment Gore completes renovations to Tenn. home Gore: US blocking
climate talks progress Keys, Thurman among Nobel concert celebs Gore accepts Nobel Prize, calls for action But a funny thing
happened on the way to the
planetary hot flash: Much of the planet grew bitterly cold.
This is basic research at a down - to - earth level:
climate science can't make sense of what is
happening now without a better understanding of what has always
happened, and of the swings in
planetary temperatures over the past 4.5 billion years.