From left, Chris Lewicki, Planetary Resources's chief executive and president; Étienne Schneider, deputy prime minister of Luxembourg; and the Hereditary Grand Duke and Duchess of Luxembourg on a tour of
Planetary Resources in Washington State.
Not exact matches
«H.R. 2262 fuels a new economy that will open many avenues for the continual growth and prosperity of humanity,» Chris Lewicki,
Planetary Resource's president and chief engineer, said
in a statement.
Planetary Resources, a Seattle - based start - up founded by former Google executives, formed
in 2010 to «expand Earth's natural
resource base.»
The most advanced of these,
Planetary Resources, says it will have prospecting platforms
in place
in the next decade.
At the moment, a handful of companies such as
Planetary Resources, Deep Space Industries and Kepler Energy and Space Engineering have announced various strategies to reach asteroids
in the inner solar system.
For
Planetary Resources, the first wave of development is to culminate
in a doughnut - shape spacecraft heading on a prospecting mission to a near - Earth asteroid
in 2020.
Back
in April, Luxembourg's crown prince, his wife and government officials paid a visit to
Planetary Resources, putting on white gowns, gloves, wispy caps and baby blue bootees — a distinctly unroyal outfit sometimes called a «bunny suit» — to take a close look at where the company is assembling small satellites.
Hard as it might be to imagine, a paradise of peace, plenty, and
planetary purity is just as achievable as walking on the moon or carrying the world's informational
resources in your pocket.
As a business,
Planetary Resources is betting that by the time it extracts water from an asteroid, there will be a customer like NASA interested
in buying water, hydrogen and oxygen.
Officials at Moon Express and
Planetary Resources say they do not want unfettered freedom
in space, nor do they seek withdrawal from the Outer Space Treaty.
9:15 Practical social change business designs solve the
planetary problems based
in resource issues.
Chris Lewicki, a former NASA scientist and currently the president and chief engineer of
Planetary Resources, chats with Cambridge House Live's Bridgitte Anderson about opportunities for mining
in outer space.
Eric Anderson, co-founder of Space Adventures and
Planetary Resources remarked that «investors would have to be crazy to hand over their bank statements and tax returns to a startup that might not be around
in a year.
For more information and to view photo / video highlights of past Expeditions, please visit: http://spaceangels.com/expedition Companies and organizations who've participated
in previous Expeditions include: SpaceX, Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, Planet [Labs], Facebook, Made
in Space, Terra Bella,
Planetary Resources, Spaceflight Industries, BlackSky Global, Ventions, Spire, Kymeta, Tethers Unlimited, Oculus, XCOR, Masten, Final Frontier Design, B612 Foundation, SETI Institute, Museum of Flight, Mojave Air & Spaceport, Boeing, NASA Ames, and more.
But there is also the promise of a unified
planetary society living
in harmony with nature, using the natural
resources of the earth for the benefit of all the earth's living creatures, and opening up prospects of human adventures never before possible.
Were the church able to provide a vision of a unified
planetary society organized both politically and technologically
in such a way as to make available the full
resources of the earth for the benefit of all the world's people, would it be effective
in generating social change?
Asserting that
in our time the whole
planetary system must be taken into account
in planning for a humanly desirable future, he argues that the prime end must be to redirect the use of human and technological
resources to overcoming the gap between the affluent nations and that much larger portion of mankind which still exists
in hunger, poverty, disease, and misery.
This credo and strategy must be developed
in alliance with secular futurists and other persons who are committed to a vision of a
planetary brotherhood, living at peace with nature and with God,
in which all people have equal access to the material
resources of the world.
«Chris had the technical experience and leadership skills that we needed at
Planetary Resources to take it forward over the next decade,» says Anderson, who adds that Lewicki's passion and grit were other key factors
in their hiring decision.
As the CEO and chief asteroid miner of
Planetary Resources, Inc. in Redmond, Washington, the 42 - year - old aerospace engineer is looking to identify how the materials in near - Earth asteroids — namely metals and water — can be used to one day facilitate long - haul space missions and travel, and even save the Earth's resources from being
Resources, Inc.
in Redmond, Washington, the 42 - year - old aerospace engineer is looking to identify how the materials
in near - Earth asteroids — namely metals and water — can be used to one day facilitate long - haul space missions and travel, and even save the Earth's
resources from being
resources from being overused.
Participating
in the conversation were Russlynn Ali, assistant secretary for civil rights at the Department of Education; Joan Steitz, a molecular biophysicist at Yale University who studies RNA; Shirley Malcom, head of the directorate for education and human
resources at AAAS; and Sara Seager, a
planetary scientist and physicist at MIT who studies the atmospheres of planets beyond the solar system.
«An asteroid
in the Earth - moon system would provide a safer destination to begin developing our capability for human deep space exploration,» says Chris Lewicki of
Planetary Resources, a space - mining firm
in Seattle.
In that solutions space, there also lies a new charter for the social sciences; a call for more — and better — social scientific knowledge to inform and inspire the kind of transformative responses needed to face humanity's greatest challenge: to simultaneously safeguard
planetary resources, social equity, and human wellbeing.
It really made me feel like they just want to spend money on design and fabricate some test vehicles but not launch them because # 1 it to expensive and # 2 they really don't know where to go or than an asteroid mission because
Planetary Resources really doesn't want to spend their own money on R&D... Considering the events
in the Ukraine and Iran... The world may end before the SLS / Orion goes anywhere other LEO or maybe just maybe to the Moon!!!
In December,
Planetary Resources will launch the Arkyd 6, which will provide the first demonstration of the sensing technology that the company plans to use to detect resources on a
Resources will launch the Arkyd 6, which will provide the first demonstration of the sensing technology that the company plans to use to detect
resources on a
resources on asteroids.
But
in the three - and - a-half years since then,
Planetary Resources has made significant progress towards developing and testing the technology needed to make its dream become a reality, according to Lewicki, who served as flight director for NASA's Spirit and Opportunity Mars rovers, and surface mission manager for the Phoenix Mars Lander.
Eric Anderson, co-founder and co-chairman of
Planetary Resources Inc., said in a statement, «This key technology for determining resources on asteroids can also be applied towards monitoring and managing high - value resources on our hom
Resources Inc., said
in a statement, «This key technology for determining
resources on asteroids can also be applied towards monitoring and managing high - value resources on our hom
resources on asteroids can also be applied towards monitoring and managing high - value
resources on our hom
resources on our home planet.
In February 2015, Steve Glendenning (
[email protected]) presented at the
Planetary EPO Community's monthly community call to share out information regarding the NASA 3D
Resources portal: http://nasa3d.arc.nasa.gov
Our ISO Class 7 (Class 10,000) clean room facilities at
Planetary Resources allow for multiple spacecraft builds and component assemblies
in parallel.
Today,
in times of
resource scarcity, global warming and impending nuclear conflict, this claim is being boldly asserted once again —
in the form, however, of a private - sector undertaking driven primarily by US tech billionaires from the new space industry, not least — as they claim —
in order to secure the survival of mankind against home - made
planetary collapse.
In light of these matters, why would we want to expend the energy and resources to treat a symptom of planetary CO2 poisoning and take all the risks that LG describes when it pretty clear that the best approach is a wildly ambitious conversion to very low emission energy / transportation / agriculture systems followed by a wildly ambitious global program of CO2 sequestration / removal from the oceans and / or atmosphere to push the needle back down under 400 ppm in a decade or two at mos
In light of these matters, why would we want to expend the energy and
resources to treat a symptom of
planetary CO2 poisoning and take all the risks that LG describes when it pretty clear that the best approach is a wildly ambitious conversion to very low emission energy / transportation / agriculture systems followed by a wildly ambitious global program of CO2 sequestration / removal from the oceans and / or atmosphere to push the needle back down under 400 ppm
in a decade or two at mos
in a decade or two at most?
If human - induced global warming, among other factors such as human - driven pollution and human - forced overpopulation, serve decisively to precipitate the massive extinction of biodiversity, the irreversible degradation of Earth's environment and the reckless dissipation of its
resources, so as to make our
planetary home unfit for life as we know it, then is no one to bear responsibility for such a colossal wreckage as we could help to perpetrate
in these early years of Century XXI?
: Re sunshades, yes, what LG said at 14, plus, the shades do nothing to reduce the ocean acidification... why would we want to expend the energy and
resources to treat a symptom of
planetary CO2 poisoning and take all the risks that LG describes when it pretty clear that the best approach is a wildly ambitious conversion to very low emission energy / transportation / agriculture systems **** concurrent with, and achieved by the same means, *** a wildly ambitious global program of CO2 sequestration / removal... and... under *** 300 ppm ***
in 20 — 100 years, at most?
# 30 mike said: Re sunshades, yes, what LG said at 14, plus, the shades do nothing to reduce the ocean acidification... why would we want to expend the energy and
resources to treat a symptom of
planetary CO2 poisoning and take all the risks that LG describes when it pretty clear that the best approach is a wildly ambitious conversion to very low emission energy / transportation / agriculture systems **** followed by *** a wildly ambitious global program of CO2 sequestration / removal... and... under *** 400 ppm ***
in *** a decade or *** two at most?
We got the idea together just by talking and laughing about the absurdity of the notion that the way out of this
planetary crisis — which is deeply rooted
in overuse of scarce
resources — is to go out and «shop to save the planet.»
It is simply this: Earth's body is finite, its
resources are limited, and its ecosystem services capable of irreversible degradation by the huge scale and anticipated growth of human over-consumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities, the ones we see rampantly overspreading the surface of our
planetary home
in our time.
Perhaps many too many leaders of the global political economy are spurning the moral obligations, responsibilities and duties associated with their stations
in life by turning a blind eye to the gigantic scale and anticipated growth of human over-consumption, overproduction and overpopulation activities that can be seen precipitating the extirpation of species like the polar bear, the reckless dissipation of non-renewable natural
resources and the drastic degradation of the environs of our
planetary home.
Please forgive me for stating the obvious: there are mountains of scientific evidence, plenty of sound reasons and abundant common sense imploring the leaders of India, China, the US and the rest of the over-developed and under - developed world to consider that the seemingly endless, global expansion of large - scale industrialization and production capabilities, now overspreading the surface of Earth, could be approaching a point
in history when these unbridled big - business activities could dangerously destablize frangible global ecosystems, irreversibly degrade the environment, recklessly dissipate Earth's natural
resource base and, perhaps, destroy our
planetary home as a fit place for human habitation by our children.
We have good scientific knowledge that our
planetary home exists
in space - time, is finite, has frangible ecological systems and possesses scarce
resources, many of which are being dissipated by you and me, so that our children and coming generations will likely be deprived of them.
The same refusal to face reality that has trashed our financial
resources is reflected
in our inability to manage
planetary resources.
If per human overconsumption of scarce
resources; unbridled economic globalization overspreading the surface of our
planetary home; and the skyrocketing increase of absolute global human population numbers could be occurring synergistically
in our time and could have something to do with the distinctly human - driven predicament which looms ominously before humanity, does it make sense to consider, just for a moment, what might to done to set limits on these overgrown human activities?
Excerpt: President Obama's «science czar,» John Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, «compulsory sterilization,» and the creation of a «
Planetary Regime» that would oversee human population levels and control all natural
resources as a means of protecting the planet — controversial ideas his critics say should have been brought up
in his Senate confirmation hearings.
This, they say, points to the profound scale of global inequality, which means that the benefits of the so - called Great Acceleration
in consumption of
resources are unevenly distributed, and this
in turn confounds efforts to deal with the impact of this assault on the
planetary machinery.
while
in the context of the ongoing climate debate we continue — albeit with some embarrassment — to employ the scientifically meaningless phrase «climate change», we recognise that,
in principle, a
planetary warming to fend off otherwise imminent glacial inception, together with CO2 greening (the latter offsetting loss of vegetation footprint, the only real environmental concern) is having broad positive impacts on society, including the global economy, natural
resources, and human health.
This fixed infrastructure coupled with a pretty much insatiable human demand drive for energy services may result
in a once -
in - a-species crisis if our
planetary resource and ecosystems can no longer keep pace.
NOAH is a grassroots organisation founded
in 1969 working for equal access to the Earth's
resources for current and future generations staying within
planetary boundaries.
Interest is growing
in the nascent concept of
planetary health, and a variety of information,
resources, and opportunities for action now exist through the work of numerous projects and organizations.
To achieve that difficult - to - define state of mind would require the
resources of between two and six planet Earths, according to a new study
in a new journal that takes the concept of sustainability and applies some
planetary arithmetic.
Tom Painter Research Scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Specialties: Snow hydrology and water
resources, energy balance of snow and ice, radiative forcing by light absorbing impurities
in snow and ice, imaging spectroscopy and multispectral remote sensing, and
planetary ices
This Article addresses this gap
in the literature by investigating what level of biophysical
resource use is associated with meeting people's basic needs, and whether this level of
resource use can be extended to all people without exceeding critical
planetary boundaries.