That stubborn error in the satellite data is about six times larger than what is scientifically possible, and several times larger than the effect scientists are trying to see, namely
planetary warming caused by continued massive emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Not exact matches
The human mass is spiritually
warmed and illumined by the iron grip of
planetary compression; and the
warming, whereby the rays of individual interaction expand, induces a further increase, in a kind of recoil, of the compression which was its
cause... and so on, in a chain - reaction of increasing rapidity.
Jacobson said the sum of
warming caused by all anthropogenic greenhouse gases — CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, chlorofluorocarbons and some others — plus the
warming caused by black and brown carbon will yield a
planetary warming effect of 2 degrees Celsius over the 20 - year period simulated by the computer.
Reducing the emissions of the greenhouse gases that
cause global
warming makes the most sense in the context of
planetary boundaries, and many of the other thresholds collapse into it, Blomqvist and his colleagues note.
In 2012, however, Muller concluded that «humans are almost entirely the
cause» of recent
planetary warming.
Put together, all of the
warming caused by biomass - related CO2 emissions and black and brown carbon particles creates a
planetary warming effect of 2 degrees Celsius (35.6 degrees Fahrenheit) over the two - decade period simulated by the computer.
There are multiple
causes of the detailed processes involved in global amphibian declines and extinctions [107]--[108], but global
warming is a key contributor and portends a
planetary - scale mass extinction in the making unless action is taken to stabilize climate while also fighting biodiversity's other threats [109].
The resulting
planetary energy imbalance, absorbed solar energy exceeding heat emitted to space,
causes Earth to
warm.
However, much of the
warming in the next 50 years will be from presently «unrealized
warming»
caused by the existing
planetary radiative imbalance of at least 0.5 W / m2 (8, 37).
Forty - four percent (44 %) of U.S. voters now say long - term
planetary trends are the
cause of global
warming, compared to 41 % who blame it on human activity.
[Response: What if we postulate a feedback between ozone depletion, which
causes people to get better sun tans,
warming the climate due to decreasing
planetary albedo?
This implies that the CRF levels must have systematically decreased over time,
causing a long - term decrease in the low cloud fraction and hence a long - term reduction in the
planetary albedo, that again would be responsible for the
warming.
Under this scenario, as greenhouse gasses build up, and
cause planetary warming, yet more greenhouse gasses are released which
causes still more
warming.
From Rasmussen Reports Voters in recent months have been increasingly skeptical of the idea that global
warming is chiefly
caused by human activity, but the number who blame long term
planetary trends instead has now fallen back to its lowest level in nearly a year.
«Exxon's «Lights Across America» website advertisement states that natural gas is «helping dramatically reduce America's emissions» even though natural gas is a fossil fuel
causing widespread
planetary warming and harm to coastal cities like San Francisco and the use of natural gas competes with wind and solar, which have no greenhouse gas emissions.»
You propose the so - called saw tooth as having it's
cause in a massive seismic event that produced decadal scale
warming on a
planetary scale.
So, we know humans are
causing greenhouse gas concentrations to be increased and this in turn is contributing to
planetary warming.
The attempt to involve «fluorocarbons» and other superfluous «concepts» is based still in the misinterpretations of Energy prevalent within «greenhouse science» as still the Energy incident to the surface, persistently within the Visible and Lower UV spectrum, has NOT been observed to alter in any manner sufficiently significant to
cause either «
warming» or «cooling» in interaction with the materials actually present both within the atmosphere, or on the
planetary surface.
or the lack of indisputable proof that «
warming» is
caused by human actions... or the acknowledgement that IF there is actual «
warming», that it may be
caused by some much larger unknown cyclical
planetary phenomenon that would take a millennia to track and research.
Easterbrook's predictions were «right on the money» seven years before Al Gore and the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for warning that the Earth was facing catastrophic
warming caused by rising levels of carbon dioxide, which Gore called a «
planetary emergency.»
There are multiple
causes of the detailed processes involved in global amphibian declines and extinctions [107]--[108], but global
warming is a key contributor and portends a
planetary - scale mass extinction in the making unless action is taken to stabilize climate while also fighting biodiversity's other threats [109].
The resulting
planetary energy imbalance, absorbed solar energy exceeding heat emitted to space,
causes Earth to
warm.
And it is that which is probably
causing the simultaneous
warming that has been observed over recent years on many of the
planetary bodies in the solar system.
1) Latitudinal temperature anomaly paradox (Strike 1) The latitudinal temperature anomaly paradox is the fact that the latitudinal pattern of
warming in the last 50 years does match the pattern of
warming that would occur if the recent increase in
planetary temperature was
caused by the CO2 mechanism.
We know without a doubt that gases we are adding to the air have
caused a
planetary energy imbalance and global
warming, already 0.8 degrees Celsius since pre-industrial times.
When fossil fuels are the number one source of human -
caused GHG emissions, creating a
planetary crisis of global
warming that is already
causing devastating extreme weather disturbances, we can't ignore it.»
Therein, Pope Francis echoed President Obama's tune, claiming there exists «solid scientific consensus» that human activities are
causing a «disturbing
warming» of the climate, which left unchecked will result in a type of
planetary Armageddon manifested by escalating temperatures, melting polar ice caps, rising seas, more frequent and more severe weather, ecosystem degradation, and plant and animal extinctions, all of which he claimed will severely affect humanity.
«In fact, 50 % of voters now believe that global
warming is
caused primarily by long - term
planetary trends, a high for the year.
You need to consider all the other things, besides GHG, which can and do «force» the climate (i.e.,
cause warming or cooling across the
planetary system).
The temporary imbalance between the energy absorbed from the Sun and heat emission to space,
causes the planet to
warm until
planetary energy balance is restored.»
Moreover, the loss of sea ice would have altered the
planetary albedo,
causing the planet to
warm until clouds cover had increased enough for the radiation balance at the TOA to be restored.
Instead of publicly expressing their views, a group of parliamentarians said skeptics should parrot the imploding official narrative: The notion that global
warming, which even leading alarmists admit has been on «pause» for 17 years in defiance of every UN climate model, is
caused by human activities and requires
planetary carbon taxes and more government control.