The big bang has likely happened many times, just as there are multiple
planets supporting life just in our arm of the galaxy.
On the current topic, though, about which
planets support life, the question whether such life will become spacefaring or not is secondary.
NGIMS electrical lead Florence Tan said the information the instrument is trying to find supports mankind's desire to determine if Earth is the only
planet supporting life.
Not exact matches
We always wanted to use that because it was a touchstone of the show and then we realized there was an actual
planet circling the star system that could
support life.
On the one hand, says Haff, we can no longer
live without the «
support structure and the services provided by technology» — the communication, transportation, energy, and other networks that developed to make human
life on an increasingly crowded
planet function in the first place.
If Earth isn't the only
planet capable of
supporting life, and there are definitely no aliens out there, then something grim is going on.
He believes
life on other
planets could exist and even has
supported the most evil thing ever: BIRTH CONTROL!!!!! OMG What's next?
Be it in the form of solar system
supporting life on
planet earth or in the works of a scientist who is researching, Creativity a force, a constance presence is eternally at work.
You can not leave this tiny speck of a
planet without
life support.
According to Phys.org, the magazine reported that the
planet could have conditions that
supported life.
(Hint: The universe is a really big place with lots of
planets spread very far apart with very few of them able to
support life.)
By destroying
life -
support systems of this
planet we are impoverishing the
life of God.
What about the Mormons that believe in mormon magical underwear that protects them from evil.Or they revere Joesoph Smith as their messiah when he was a con artist, molester, rapist, theif.Or what about Mormons believe god
lives on
planet kolob lol.I am a conservative christian repub and can not vote for a cult bishop like Romney, Do nt sell your sould
supporting a cult bishop who believes this garbage lol.
Earth itself would not
support most of the
life on this
planet... enter the cytoplasm, which over many million years, slowly changed the atmosphere into one that was oxygen rich.
The sun is not perfectly positioned upon the earth by accident it was placed there for a reason and purpose to
support life which is God attended... We are not on this
planet on accident we did not evolve from a single cell that theory has been debunked for many years...
Just because the odds are against a
planet being able to
support life doesn't mean it doesn't happen, particularly when there are so many
planets.
We
live on a
planet that rotates on its axes while rotating around the sun and neither are
support by anything we can see.
Due to the shear number of
planets, of course one has to have the perfect conditions to
support life, which (over billions of years of EVOLUTION) has perfected all of those systems to the point where we can debate about where it all came from.
Overreaching ourselves could lead to the collapse of the
planet's entire
life -
support system.
As another example, if the relationship between the strengths of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force were not close to what it is, then the cosmos would not harbor any stars that explode and spew out
life -
supporting chemical elements into space or any other stars that form
planets.
It was trying to determine the statistical likelihood that on all the
planets circling all the starts in the universe, that another
planet could
support life (based, I would imagine, on the conditions as we understand them, for
life based on the laws of physics).
But it does seem clear to me that we need to begin with a vision of a world community (1) consisting of a population within the biological carrying capacity of the
planet (2) organized politically and economically in ways that provide to all human beings equal access to the means of material fulfillment and (3) organized technologically in ways that (4) neither exhaust essential natural resources of earth nor (5) upset the delicate balances of nature which make the environment capable of
supporting life.
How many
planets out of the trillions out there could
support life?
So you're saying its either believe in some man made religion's guess at the origin of
life or that aliens started
life on our
planet even though we don't have any scientific evidence to
support it?
We don't know what an «old earth» looks like, as we have never found another
planet that
supports life that we can compare to.
The odds of there being another earth - like
planet that could
support life are getting larger and larger the more we discover, chief!
No, thanks... I'll stick with the possibility that we are part of a higher intelligence known as God and that I have somewhere to go when I die pretty much because evolution is a by product of mankind and they haven't even ventured very far in the universe not have they even explained even the tiniest portions of the fossile records to
support the diversity of
life on this
planet.
Each galaxy likely contains hundreds of millions of
planets, many of which can
support life.
I also find your assertion that there is no other
planet that is orbiting a sun at the right distance to
support life highly unlikely given the size of the universe and the age.
«The next fifty years will be crucial to our
planet's future,» says Bill McKibben, because they «could so devastate the earth's biology [sic] that it will never again be able to
support life as abundantly as it does at present.»
Granted, the origins of the universe and
life on the
planet are clearly in the unknown categories, neither explicitly / implicitly
supporting nor detracting from a deity - based external cause hypothesis.
For the first time in the history of creation, the
life support systems of the
Planet Earth are being destroyed by human activities... Throughout history humans have caused locally significant damage to the environment, but never before have human numbers and actions combined to threaten the integrity of the entire p
Planet Earth are being destroyed by human activities... Throughout history humans have caused locally significant damage to the environment, but never before have human numbers and actions combined to threaten the integrity of the entire
planetplanet.
by calculating the estimation of how many galaxies are in the universe, times how many
planets in each, times how many likely have the conditions that
support life, times the probability of elements combining and creating
life... the result is something like there could be 10 million
planets that have
life on them, aka aliens
For the whole tale of man's struggles, discoveries, achievements, insights and aspirations ends automatically when this little
planet becomes either too hot or too cold to
support human
life.
HIGHBURY44, What is really embarrassing is the fast diminishing few «away with the fairies,
living on
Planet Wenger» on here and weirdly still
supporting him.
He's a bit more optimistic than I am about our
support network since he has a lot of local family and has been able to count on their input into his
life and well - being for his entire time on this
planet.
One game I like to play is: «Connecticut Gubernatorial Candidate or Recently Discovered
Planet That Could
Support Life.»
We all depend on the ocean to
support life... New York is a part of the
planet you lying ignoramus!
It works to combat poverty and promote sustainable development by financing and
supporting projects that improve
living conditions for populations, promote economic growth and protect the
planet.
He is the «17th richest man on the
planet and he doesn't
support a
living wage,» she said.
This new mass - measuring technique should allow researchers to determine which distant
planets could
support life.
These days the Martian atmosphere is thin and about 95 per cent CO2, but scientists think that 3 or 4 billion years ago the
planet's gassy envelope was much thicker and even richer in carbon, making its surface warm enough to
support liquid water — and possibly
life.
It has identified five potential «super-Earths» —
planets one and a quarter to two times as wide as our own that might
support life.
He advocated that other stars were like our sun, and that they could each
support planets teeming with
life.
Merchant suggested that the presence or absence of magnetic fields might be one way to tell whether a
planet could
support life.
Its existence is currently purely hypothetical as there is yet no evidence of any
planets that can
support life, or actual extraterrestrial
life that has been widely accepted by the scientific community.
Many
planets outside the solar system are even more massive than Jupiter, and they orbit their Sun - like stars at an Earth - like distance, but these faraway super-Jupiters are effectively giant gas balls that can not
support life because they lack solid surfaces.
The
planet appears to be too hot and violent to
support anything like
life as we know it, but now that astronomers know how to study the atmosphere of one exoplanet, they are ready to try extending the technique to other, potentially more inviting worlds.
1 Astronomers Margaret Turnbull and Jill Tarter of the Carnegie Institution in Washington, D.C., have compiled a list of 17,129 nearby stars most likely to have
planets that could
support complex
life.
This «astrobiological perspective» casts sustainability as a place - specific subset of habitability, or a
planet's ability to
support life.