Sentences with phrase «planned home births result»

«among low - risk women, planned home births result in low rates of interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and babies.»

In today's peer - reviewed Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health (JMWH), a landmark study confirms that among low - risk women, planned home births result in low rates of interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and babies.

«Planned home births result in low rates of interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and babies,» Simkins boasts.

The study reviewed the births of nearly 17,000 women and found that, among low - risk women, planned home births result in low rates of birth interventions without an increase in adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns.

These findings follow earlier research by Janssen that demonstrated that planned home births resulted in fewer interventions and similar rates of adverse newborn outcomes compared to planned hospital births among women who met the criteria for home births.

Not exact matches

The American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists emphasized the results of the Wax study in its official statement on homebirth, siting that «Women inquiring about planned home birth should be informed of its risks and benefits based on recent evidence.

Study results provide evidence that mortality outcomes in planned home birth are not significantly different compared to planned hospital birth, among 693,592 women with singleton births in the Netherlands.

If so, this self selection may have resulted in better outcomes among women with planned home birth.

Results: 50 perinatal deaths occurred in 7002 planned home births in Australia during 1985 - 90: 7.1 per 1000 (95 % confidence interval 5.2 to 9.1) according to Australian definitions and 6.4 per 1000 (4.6 to 8.3) according to World Health Organisation definitions.

There was, however, an increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcome associated with planned birth at home in nulliparous low risk women, resulting in the probability of it being the most cost effective option at a cost effectiveness threshold of # 20000 declining to 0.63.

There was, however, an increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes associated with planned birth at home in nulliparous low risk women, resulting in the probability of it being the most cost effective option at a threshold of # 20000 declining to 0.63.

Hutton et al: Quite literally, the trend continued, in that the next study was also Canadian: «Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low - risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003 - 2006,» not surprisingly shows similar results to the Janssen study.

It could be argued that unplanned home births are similar to planned home births which were transferred to hospital during labour (because birth did not take place in the intended location), and that not getting to hospital in time is a risk of planning a hospital birth, and for this reason we have run the analysis both with and without unplanned home births (see «results» section).

Future research should also attempt to establish whether or not these results also apply to more life - threatening categories of PPH (e.g. > 1,500 ml of blood lost), and whether the lower incidence of PPH among planned home births translates to fewer cases of PPH - related severe morbidity.

«This study adds to the large and growing body of research that has found that planned home birth with a midwife is not only safe for babies and mothers with low - risk pregnancies, but results in health and cost benefits that reach far beyond one pregnancy.»

Results: The rate of perinatal death per 1000 births was 0.35 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.00 — 1.03) in the group of planned home births; the rate in the group of planned hospital births was 0.57 (95 % CI 0.00 — 1.43) among women attended by a midwife and 0.64 (95 % CI 0.00 — 1.56) among those attended by a physician.

RESULTS: The rate of perinatal death per 1000 births was 0.35 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.00 - 1.03) in the group of planned home births; the rate in the group of planned hospital births was 0.57 (95 % CI 0.00 - 1.43) among women attended by a midwife and 0.64 (95 % CI 0.00 - 1.56) among those attended by a physician.

Including these women among hospital births would bias the results of planned hospital births negatively and home births positively.

The authors» main argument against the proven cost - effectiveness of planned home birth is that «the lifetime costs of supporting the neurologically disabled children who will result from planned home birth» have not been factored in, nor have the supposedly increased rates of death.

Not only is this unfortunate because of a lack of people to share experiences / plans with, but the result also is that more time is spent on preparing for a hospital birth than on the details of what it's like to be preparing for a planned home birth.