Environmentalist Mark Lynas has shown how phasing out
planned nuclear programmes in a number of countries as a result of the Fukushima disaster could add another degree to global warming.
Not exact matches
My Oxford colleague Blake Ewing makes an engaging case in favour of the UK pursuing unilateral
nuclear disarmament — that is, scrapping the
planned replacement
programme for the Royal Navy's Vanguard - class submarines, which currently carry the Trident D5 missile — as a solution to the country's fiscal travails.
The truth about Britain's current
nuclear programme is that the dream of numerous new plants coming on - stream, funded by investors and assisted by favourable
planning and development arrangements, is as good as dead.
One early study suggested that up to 12 GW of offshore wind capacity could be installed around Japan by 2010, generating around 39 TWh pa, about the same as was expected from then
planned 17
nuclear reactor expansion
programme.
At the same time it announced that China's
nuclear programme, suspended after the Fukushima disaster, would resume but at a slower pace than initially
planned Under the 12th Five ‐ Year
Plan.