Sentences with phrase «plant costs roughly»

Not exact matches

We [achieve our mission] by harnessing the power of markets and food technology to create alternatives to industrial animal agriculture that are delicious, cost competitive, and convenient -LSB-...] Fifteen years ago, plant - based milk represented roughly 0 % of the milk market; now it is at 10 % -LSB-...] GFI is laser - focused on replicating (and exceeding!)

«The bad news is [that] it increases the cost of power roughly 60 to 70 percent for a new plant and probably by more than double for an existing plant,» says L. Doug Carter, senior energy advisor at Washington, D.C. — based law firm Van Ness Feldman.

The natural stormwater management can handle millions of gallons of water and cost the plant roughly one - third of the $ 50 million necessary to construct a conventional water treatment plant.

The price would be roughly comparable to that of capturing carbon dioxide at power plants and storing it underground, which would eventually cost about $ 200 per ton of carbon, according to a recent study from Harvard University's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, compared with about $ 400 per ton of carbon for the forests.

All told, that means thermal energy storage at Andasol 1 or power plants like it costs roughly $ 50 per kilowatt - hour to install, according to NREL's Glatzmaier.

Yohe estimates the cost of achieving a more modest goal of holding warming to roughly 2 degrees C at a cost of 0.5 to 1.5 percent of gross domestic product for the U.S. by 2050, thanks to the expense incurred by, for example, replacing existing coal - fired power plants with renewables or retrofitting them with carbon - capture technology.

NuScale claims it will be able to produce power at about seven to nine cents per kilowatt - hour — roughly the same as big nuclear plants, only a few cents more than the cheapest modern natural gas — fired or coal - fired plants, and one - third the cost of a typical diesel generator.

A wholesale transfer to dry casks at U.S. plants would cost roughly $ 4 billion.

The annual cost of replacing all of South Korea's nuclear plants with natural gas would be $ 10 billion on top of a one - time cost of roughly $ 20 billion to build new natural gas plants.

«With this plant, we can show costs of roughly $ 600 per tonne [of CO2], which is, of course, if we compare it to a market price, very high.

Just released Australian Government AETA report gives estimates of capital costs for new electricity plants in Australia (The ratios are roughly similar in US): Wind = $ 2530 / kW Coal = $ 3124 / kW Nuclear = $ 3470 / kW AETA (2102), Table 5.2.2, p87, http://bree.gov.au/documents/publications/Australian-Energy-Technology-Assessment.pdf

Now that Ohio - based utility First Energy has declared bankruptcy, there is the possibility that its three nuclear plants could be purchased by Exelon, which has proven capable of operating its plants at a cost that is roughly one - quarter less than other nuclear operators.

Very roughly Electricity costs from existing Australian coal fired power stations might be say $ 25billion / TWh and from existing European and US nuclear plants (Gen II) say the cost is the same, i.e. $ 25billion / TWh.

For example, the cost of Southern Company's Kemper County integrated gasification combined cycle plant (designed to capture 65 % of carbon dioxide emissions) has risen from roughly $ 2 billion in 2006 to well over $ 5 billion as of mid-2014.

Well, the ongoing plant costs under my scheme cost # 1,099,180,017 — roughly a # billion per year for the entire domestic sector.

A simple cost analysis (apparently beyond the capability of the Times) would clearly show slar thermal to cost roughly 6 times more than a nuclear plant and provide (unreliable) electricity costing at least 4 times more, even when using the Fanatasyland estimate by unreliable sources like Woolard of BrightSource Energy.

To fully realize this potential, the MIT team estimated that the government would have to invest up to $ 1 billion in geothermal research and development in the years immediately ahead, roughly the cost of one large coal - fired power plant.

Besides building out industrial wind and solar, the $ 2.5 billion CEP would retire prematurely 660 megawatts (enough to power roughly 660,000 homes) of relatively young, low - cost, highly - utilized, environmentally state - of - art coal - fueled power plants.

Australia's newest coal power plant, the Kogan Creek Power Station, cost roughly $ 2,000 a kilowatt to build in today's money.

In an Oct. 10 letter, Robert Gay, vice president and project executive at AECOM — which is overseeing $ 500 million of work on the roughly $ 1 billion, 3 million - square - foot plant — cites an unpaid $ 21 million deposit, due in September, to an escrow account to cover material costs and subcontractor work.