«Solar not only meets this peak need at a lower per kilowatt - hour cost, but also without the harmful emissions from running a power
plant on standby (or fracking its fuel out of the ground),» he writes.
So, even in their own reality, they're the bad apples for, climate (windmills apparently change local climate and global climate is just statistics of local climate, but besides every windmill needs a 1:1 existence of coal, gas or nuclear power
plant on standby).
Not exact matches
(2007) • Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security (2007) • Modelling Investment Risks and Uncertainties with Real Options Approach (2007) • Financing Energy Efficient Homes Existing Policy Responses to Financial Barriers (2007) • CO2 Allowance and Electricity Price Interaction - Impact
on Industry's Electricity Purchasing Strategies in Europe (2007) • CO2 Capture Ready
Plants (2007) • Fuel - Efficient Road Vehicle Non-Engine Components (2007) • Impact of Climate Change Policy Uncertainty
on Power Generation Investments (2006) • Raising the Profile of Energy Efficiency in China — Case Study of
Standby Power Efficiency (2006) • Barriers to the Diffusion of Solar Thermal Technologies (2006) • Barriers to Technology Diffusion: The Case of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (2006) • Certainty versus Ambition — Economic Efficiency in Mitigating Climate Change (2006) • Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Institutional and Operational Issues (2006) • Sectoral Approaches to GHG Mitigation: Scenarios for Integration (2006) • Energy Efficiency in the Refurbishment of High - Rise Residential Buildings (2006) • Can Energy - Efficient Electrical Appliances Be Considered «Environmental Goods»?
To avoid blackouts governments and / or consumers are forced to fund diesel, gas or coal
plants to remain
on standby or as spinning reserves until needed.
Either you didn't understand the question or you are really believing that 48.8 GW of conventional power
plant capacity was
on standby, ready to jump in in case the wind and solar output suddenly would drop to 0 GW.
Question: how many fossil fuel power
plants do you think are running
on standby at any time in Germany?
Natural gas would provide the second - level of load - balancing with Victoria's aging brown coal - fired power
plants remaining
on standby to handle high seasonal loads.
It also means you don't save that much in terms of carbon dioxide emissions, which is supposed to be the whole point, because you've got fossil fuel
plants all fired up but only running at half - throttle or
on «hot»
standby.
It's possible, for instance, that coal
plants announcing the intention to close next spring might be persuaded to stay open — or at least remain
on standby — if they receive government support.
Wind / solar are limited to a small percentage of the total, due to the inherent lack of reliability — and, when you calculate in the CO2 from the required gas - fired
standby plants for the 75 - 80 % of the time they are idle, there is very little net reduction in CO2 and essentially no impact
on global warming.
This means that fossil fuel
plants have to burn fuel
on standby in case the wind suddenly drops.
Since the dirty reliable power must remain
on standby to backup the new unpredictable wind power, there is virtually no reduction in the use of dirty power
plants or the dirty fuel they burn.