«The efficiency of converting coal into electricity matters: more efficient power
plants use less fuel and emit less climate - damaging carbon dioxide,» wrote the authors of the International Energy Agency report on measuring coal plant performance.
Not exact matches
Combination of economic trends and policies Still, for now an array of Obama administration actions and economic trends are conspiring to cut emissions, according to EIA: Americans are
using less oil because of high gasoline prices; carmakers are complying with federal
fuel economy standards; electricity companies are becoming more efficient; state renewable energy rules are ushering wind and solar energy onto the power grids; gas prices are competitive with coal; and federal air quality regulations are closing the dirtiest power
plants.
Natural gas blended with renewable hydrogen also produces
less emissions than regular natural gas when
used at a power
plant or as a transport
fuel.
In addition, only about one tenth of the mined uranium ore is converted into
fuel in the enrichment process (during which the concentration of uranium 235 is increased considerably), so
less than a hundredth of the ore's total energy content is
used to generate power in today's
plants.
And the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in 2006 suggested the practice of overcrowding pools for the storage of spent nuclear
fuel rods — that has caused fires and explosions at Fukushima Daiichi, which stores far
less used fuel than typical U.S.
plants — could prove dangerous.
Less commonly, countries spoke of reducing the
use of inefficient coal - fired power
plants, lowering methane emissions from oil and gas production, reforming fossil
fuel subsidies, and carbon pricing, the report says.
For one thing,
plant - based diets
use fewer natural resources (such as water and fossil
fuels) and create
less pollution than meat - heavy diets.
It's a fact of life that some power
plants are
used less, and others
used more, when
fuel prices change, for example.
Actually, if you properly do the math - and count if you count the whole nuclear
fuel cycle, not just the power
plant, not just the core of the reactor, but the occlusion zone, the uranium mining and so on, it turns out that wind power
uses hundreds or thousands of times
less land per kilowatt hour, then nuclear does.
A study by Delta says that shaving system «peaks» reduces the need for peaking
plants which are often
less efficient and / or
use more polluting
fuels, to run; it can also enable delay or prevention of the need for investment in new network capacity.