While the manga - style characters continue to appear in Mr.'s work, their significance has shifted from playing up lolicon — the fetishization of young, fictional female characters — toward a more
platonic realm, known as moe, or love for an icon that does not carry sexual associations.
Eternal objects form a realm —
a Platonic realm?
Of course, Cardinal Kasper is right that theology is a human enterprise, done by humans with intellectual and personal histories and dispositions, and not just a participation in
a Platonic realm of ideas.
Not exact matches
The Old Testament reflects not at all
Platonic teaching about the soul as imprisoned in the flesh and escaping at death to the
realm of pure spirit, but rather Egyptian teaching, with its hope of a physical resurrection.
From Plato onwards, philosophers have sought to escape from the anxiety of personal freedom by searching for certainty and objectivity in a supra - human
realm, whether it be that of unchanging
Platonic Forms, or in the inexorable unfolding of some grand historical design, or in an eternal life with an omniscient, loving, supreme Being.
Whitehead so emphatically repudiates the
Platonic tendency to think of the
realm of forms as constituting a superior, self - sufficient type of existence, that he interprets even the propositions of mathematics as statements about certain possible forms of process.
For Whitehead value is not something which exists off in a
Platonic heaven, off in a
realm of form.
Throughout analysis, Whitehead cautions, we should remember that we are entirely in the
realm of possibility — that is, the «cuts» we make (as in later
Platonic dialectic4) are only selections among many possible analytic «cuts.»
In
Platonic philosophy eros meant the yearning of the soul for the
realm of the divine.
As an antidualist Whitehead thoroughly rejects the
Platonic notion that there exists somewhere a spiritual
realm, immutable and superior to the world of body and matter.
Affirming a
Platonic formal value does certainly undermine reductionist materialism, but it is not itself evidence of a
realm in which exists the transcendent Creator.
He couches it in
Platonic terms of a distinction between the sensible and the intelligible
realms, as with most scholasticism across the centuries.
Penrose theorizes that there exists at the Planck scale a
realm of
Platonic ideals that influence the workings of our mind.
Of course Aristotelian logic and science opposes all that
Platonic - like dual reality / dual logic stuff; the Aristotelian approach being just secular logic and secular observations... Aristotelian approach says: no higer «a priori» validity, no higher «ideal»
realm, or higher «ideal» logic.