Based on
plausible emission scenarios, average surface temperatures could rise between 2 °C and 6 °C by the end of the 21st century.
This is not meant to pre-judge whether those risks are worse than climate change impacts under
plausible emission scenarios and is not meant to claim that all geoengineering strategies are dangerous or risky.
«(2) whether United States actions, taking into account international actions, commitments, and trends, and considering the range of
plausible emissions scenarios, are sufficient to avoid --
Not exact matches
«This is worrisome given that the temperature in the study region is predicted to rise by as much as 2 degrees by midcentury under the range of
plausible greenhouse gas
emissions scenarios,» said Avery Cohn, aassistant professor of environment and resource policy at Tufts, who led the work while he was a visiting researcher at Brown.
Rutledge said of the four IPCC
scenarios, he found the second RCP
scenario, RCP 4.5, where carbon dioxide
emissions flatten out around 2080, to be more
plausible under a business - as - usual
scenario for coal exploitation.
On the high end, recent work suggests that 4 feet is
plausible.23, 3,6,7,8 In the context of risk - based analysis, some decision makers may wish to use a wider range of
scenarios, from 8 inches to 6.6 feet by 2100.10,2 In particular, the high end of these
scenarios may be useful for decision makers with a low tolerance for risk (see Figure 2.26 on global sea level rise).10, 2 Although scientists can not yet assign likelihood to any particular
scenario, in general, higher
emissions scenarios that lead to more warming would be expected to lead to higher amounts of sea level rise.
Climate change
scenarios are based on projections of future greenhouse gas (particularly carbon dioxide)
emissions and resulting atmospheric concentrations given various
plausible but imagined combinations of how governments, societies, economies, and technologies will change in the future.
Anthropogenic
emissions of CO2 are increasing, and accelerating, and current proposals for reducing them present no
plausible scenario in which
emissions will actually peak and decline in anywhere near the time frame that is required to avoid what are generally considered «dangerous» levels of CO2 (although points 1 - 3 above suggest that the current levels are more dangerous than has been generally believed).
Thus, climate scientists and energy - economic modelers have developed hundreds of
plausible scenarios of future
emissions and used them to identify
emissions pathways that might achieve climate policy goals.
Each color denotes a
plausible scenario of how the world may choose to cut fossil fuel
emissions.
On any
plausible business as usual
scenario,
emissions will grow substantially, while for any
plausible climate science model, we need to reduce
emissions substantially if we are to avoid highly damaging climate change.
It cited «
plausible scenarios in which GHG [greenhouse gas]
emissions from corn - grain ethanol are much higher than those of petroleum - based fuels,» and questioned the method by which EPA determined that ethanol would produce 21 percent less
emissions.
This makes the range of specific
emission scenarios that are compatible with a given budget very large, and the choice of how to limit the
scenarios considered
plausible is important when giving policy advice based on
emission budgets.
Similarly, because nearly any
plausible scenario would require a large amount of negative
emissions later in the century, the carbon budget itself is not a hard cap on
emissions.
The
Plausible Scenario results show a mitigation impact of 6.7 gigatons of carbon dioxide - equivalent
emissions over the period 2020 - 2050.
The
Plausible Scenario projects that energy - efficient shipping can lead to an estimated
emissions reduction of 7.9 gigatons of carbon dioxide - equivalent greenhouse gases from 2020 - 2050, at an additional cost of approximately US$ 915 billion [10] and a net operating savings of US$ 424 billion.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change model projections for 2100 exceed the full distribution of Holocene temperature under all
plausible greenhouse gas
emission scenarios.
The RCPs should be based on
scenarios published in the existing literature, developed independently by different modeling groups and, as a set, be «representative» of the total literature, in terms of
emissions and concentrations (see further in this section); At the same time, each of the RCPs should provide a
plausible and internally consistent description of the future;
Demand - side solutions account for 48.0 percent, 44.7 percent, and 40.7 percent of Food Sector
emissions reductions in the
Plausible, Drawdown, and Optimum
Scenarios, respectively.
Under the
Plausible Scenario, this solution has a reduced contribution to avoided
emissions during 2020 - 2050 of just 0.2 gigatons of carbon dioxide - equivalent greenhouse gas.
This warming must be from various,
plausible CO2
emission scenarios, and not from natural causes, of course.
Indeed, one can easily envision the
plausible scenario whereby the ESA, operating as federal law separate from the CAA, could prevent state compliance with EPA's
emissions targets.
If forests globally were to become a net source of carbon to the atmosphere in the future — an all - too -
plausible scenario under climate change — the EF would approach infinity, since additional forest would augment human carbon
emissions rather than offset them.
A clear and specific understanding of the
plausible worst - case
scenario impacts facing the world post-2050 on our current
emissions path.