This is useful where the candidate believes in «
playing by the strength».
Not exact matches
DiCaprio may be a very good actor who has hitherto been eluded
by AMPAS greatness, but he is also one who also knows the industry well enough to
play to his
strengths.
That's a vision that
plays to the
strengths of Musk — a disrupter
by nature, an upstart, and an energy outsider — and he has been betting on it for a while.
We know how to
play off of everyone's
strengths and ensure our clients are fully serviced based on their needs and objectives
by those who can best take on that role.
In the midst of giving generally good advice to conservative pro-lifers about how to
play to their political
strength —
by emphasizing the issue of late - term abortion, where a consensus of public opinion is on their side — Krauthammer offered this:
-LSB-... There's] a
strength and a power in that, and I wanted to depict that, so I wrote this character [«Bible,»
played by Shia LaBeouf].
Since «
strength of beauty»
plays the role in Adventures of Ideas that is
played by «intensity» in Process and Reality, I will substitute that term here.
Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to
play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our
strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone
by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.
Rather, he suggests features of such a theology
by playing off of the
strengths and weaknesses of his polar extremes.
Buoyed
by controversy, the film will become the most watched Passion
play in history, and so its
strengths and flaws — The Passion has plenty of both — will have a breathtakingly broad audience.
Give her but room, and do not bind her when she sleeps... And though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to
play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously,
by licensing and prohibiting, to misdoubt her
strength.
Scientists Elizabeth D. Prescott and David Julius of the University of California, San Francisco, announced they had identified a lipid molecule called PIP2 that
plays a crucial role in controlling the
strength of the burning sensation caused
by capsaicin.
We're assuming he'll be back at full
strength by SEC
play, which for Alabama begins on Dec. 30 with a home game against Texas A&M.
IF «
strength of the squad» includes Alexis, Ox, Ozil staying and IF they
play flat out all season and IF either renewing or not distracting the team with their stay / go drama for next year a and IF the bulk of the squad stays uninjured the bulk of the season and IF Wenger actually shows some strategic sense on a regular basis and IF a brilliant season and IF massive screw - ups
by most or all of the other top 6ish teams we could still pull it off.
Also,
playing a second string side against Spurs will not necessarily mean defeat and
by the same token,
playing a full
strength team will not necessarily mean that Arsenal win.
I think he needs to be
played to his
strengths by Wenger.
He is extremely mobile across the ground, with the speed to
play in a high defensive line and to keep track of quick opponents - and he's rarely beaten for
strength by the more physical opponents either.
«Bama's
strength of schedule is artificially inflated
by the presence of Mississippi State, and its scoring margin probably impacted
by playing Arkansas and Missouri without their starting quarterbacks.
SB Nation's Matthew Fairburn believes Brown will be a candidate for the NFL's Defensive Rookie of the Year award if he's drafted
by a team that can highlight his
strengths, and
plays in the right scheme.
The rankings are designed to account for opponent
strength in a way that prevents you from simply moving up when you
play (and soundly defeat) a particularly bad team or moving down when you
play (and get soundly defeated
by) a particularly good team.
Further, they also presented evidence to suggest that «a league's overall
strength... is predicted
by the current amount of foreigners
playing in it».
Such a move would benefit players such as Chelsea's Willian, who as a consequence of Brazil's
strength in depth did not meet the 75 percent criterion and so had to granted his work permit on appeal, or Seattle's DeAndre Yedlin, whose will not have
played the requisite 75 percent
by the time his move to Tottenham comes around.
Wenger has a habit of showing unrealistic loyalty to players that have progressed through the group stages and refuses to make the necessary changes when the stakes are higher i.e.
by playing the appropriate
strength team in each game.
the cheese eating surrender monkey has screwed up again we all know that now so we have to hope to get our real quality players performing to full potential that is ozil sanchez wishere carzola... i am not sure there is a combo with all four and at this moment wilshere and sanchez are the only ones looking pretty decent and as wellbeck needs to be integrated those positions are settled... i am a big ozil fan and really believe wenger is failing to get best out of him
by playing him out of position so cant we
play some kind of diamond with him at the top feeding to a front line of sanchez and wellbeck... for me neither flamini nor arteta add anything to the team so i think
playing to attacking
strengths is the only option right now... but its really a ridiculous state of affairs we have been left in... throwing caution to the wind i would go for
But that was because we abandoned our poor tiki taka philosophy and resolve it
by playing players to their
strengths.
He's
by no means a poor
playing as he has his own
strengths but either we adapt the whole team to suit his style or we get a midfielder that can player with the rest of the starting 11 and I think perhaps it's more realistic and cheaper option to do the later.
Vardy may be a hard worker, with
strength, aggression and passion, however counter attacking and long balls isn't exactly the system that Arsenal currently
play by and so I can't see Vardy replicating such form as he achieved last season with Leicester.
As we are an offensive biased club and armed with greater self belief — all this
plays into our
strengths and we
by and large succeed in winning and accruing points — although not without giving 90 minutes worth of heart palpitations to the home supporters.
After mixed spells at Malaga, Frankfurt and reading in recent years, the attacking midfielder has settled in
by the Thames and is
playing regularly in a division which doesn't necessarily
play to his
strengths.
NFL scouts endlessly debated Brees's height (again), his arm
strength and the possible skewing effect of
playing in Tiller's wide - open offense (which would be pedestrian
by today's standards, just a decade later).
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of
play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced
by a less than stellar «plug and
play» mentality where players
play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance
play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted
play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was
playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched
played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true
strength, his long ball
play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he
played with Coq Wenger always seemed to
play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted
by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been
played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed
by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Laca has a beard - so does Giroud.Other than the fact they are both French there is no comparison.Give this kid (yeah I know he's 26 but that's still young at my age) the service and he will be a top top player.Look at his movement and see how frustrated he gets as the ball continually goes from side to side and backwards.I see a lot of Ian Wright in this boy but even Wrighty would struggle with the way we are set up and play.When Sánchez is gone he will become our main man and just watch the difference.Remember those days when the football was slick and fast?Remember when we had pace all through the team and had players who knew how to use it?When we change manager a bring in a coach who gets the best from players
by playing to their
strength you will see a totally different Lacazette and Arsenal
The problem faced
by ex players such as Gary Neville and Steve Nicol is that when they
played for strong Manchester United and Liverpool teams respectively, they encountered Arsenal teams with quality,
strength and determination.
The Ryan Gosling look - a-like was asked if he ever gets hit on
by the single mom of a recruit and Kinsbury replied: «Yeah, yeah that's kind of — you've got to
play to your
strengths.
We can only evaluate the
strength of our squard
by playing with strong healthy teams, not fringe players or else we are fooling ourselves.
Like
playing a good piano accompaniment, pacing takes talent — speed,
strength and an exquisite ability to estimate the time for each early lap, and stick to it rigidly, thus giving the record - breaker - to - be a sort of human clock to guide
by.
All that transfer noise wouldn't let you realize how good our moderately priced stars are until out of the blue, we
play a full
strength Man City side that is currently managed
by the demi god, Pep Guardiola.
But he also expects Arsene Wenger to set the Gunners up to make the most of the stature,
strength and aerial ability of the big French centre forward
by playing the «long ball» game.
This season has been disappointing
by the standard he set the previous one, but with a rebuild likely incoming I truly hope we recruit players who
play to his
strengths.
In support of Admin's post, the thing I have always found perplexing is Arsenal's inabilty to
play to Giroud's
strengths by attacking down the wings and crossing into the box.
A mostly second string Arsenal side (Lacazette, Ozil, Ramsey, Kocielny, Wilshere all rested with the Europa tie in hand) outplayed at home
by Very decent full
strength side who are unfortunately in relegation and have more to
play for in other to avoid relegation.
Chelsea's game plan was to control the flow ofthe game
by allowing the other team to
play in areas where they either
play to Chelsea's
strengths or are ineffective.
its clear that roy knows how to use our arsenal players better than mr wenger and surely he must be devastated
by wilshere's injury because he understands them, knows their best positions and most of all knows how to utilize their
strengths... now before you get all cocky and bi * chy, look at the records and see it for yourself... my favorite one was when he started a young oxlade chamberlain in euro 2012 ahead of other well known stars... welbeck has an outstanding england record
playing under roy and even though theo has been injured, the few times he has
played can show you that he is really
playing a different game than the one at the emirates.......
Watching last nights game was painful
by the fact that we were constantly harassed and pressed
by a hard working and skilful Dortmund side who
played to their
strengths of pressuring Arsenal to relinquish possession and when the had it, they broke at pace and in numbers in a direct, rapier like manner.
Now I think there is still reasons to be cheerful, I agree Man C & Chelski have spent & bought some good players, we all understand that 5 of those teams might be in the CL proper which is a huge distraction for those 4 - 5 teams.Chelsea will not be able to field the same 13 - 14 players all season, as for Man C they were very frail at the back last season, add to that 2 flying wing backs and I'm not sure they will be any better this coming season.LFC will most probably have CL as well if they qualify and haven't exactly bought great players apart from Salah who could be a good aquasistion for them.Spuds have sold a good player & strengthened a rival & still not bought a single player yet, Man U have bought 2 good players & in Lukaku have a proven goal scorer in the PL but if they
play the same dour way they did last season & with the added games the CL brings will they perform week in week out in the league??? As for Everton yes they have released a lot of players and also brought in a lot too to give better quality in the squad as they have Europa league the same as US the big difference is I think we will
play squad players & youngsters maybe with a few senior players all the way up to the QF This tells me most of our rivals will pave the way for us to field pretty much the same side every weekend in the PL thus giving us an advantage over all the other 5 teams
playing in the CL & Europa, just remember the League has been won in the last 2 seasons
by teams NOT in Europe YES we are this season but I think Wenger will put all his eggs in the League basket and field an under
strength side in all comps hence focusing on the League until we are no longer in the race.
Given the style and the swagger with which Tottenham
played, coupled with the
strength of their opposition, it stands as one of the finest performances
by any English side in any game all season, and was widely interpreted as a sign that Tottenham were a seriously good team.
WEAKNESSES: Adequate height / length, but lean - framed with a slender, unimpressive build... marginal
play strength and allows physical defensive backs to slow his route and disrupt the timing... struggles to gain body position downfield... lacks the body power to force his way through tackle attempts... tends to get alligator arms on in - breaking routes as footsteps hurt his concentration... underpowered blocker... body isn't constructed for routine punishment — hampered
by a left ankle injury (Nov. 2017) down the stretch... production dropped in 2017 without John Ross drawing attention on the other side of the formation.
By the time you
play an opponent for the second time, they know your
strengths and weaknesses almost as well as you know yourself.
Our defensive
strengths last season were bolstered
by the fact that we
play possession football so well and in the prem bar a few teams none really have the attacking power to test it, however for those that did you could see the results.
Clinton has embraced this accusation and turned it into a
strength by replying «If that's
playing the woman card, deal me in.»