Sentences with phrase «play if he matches»

The bit more I was trying to get at is whether having low expectations for a player makes it easier to deal with his play if he matches them.

Not exact matches

If either team plays any extra matches, those revenues will climb even higher.

So if the emotion of the score isn't matching what's happening on screen, or playing against it if necessary, then it kind of falls flat.»

If China is to play a larger role in the City, would the latter be able to maintain transparency regulations or would it have to redefine itself to match Chinese interests?

If you were to play against someone on your first tennis match, would you pick Andy Roddick as your opponent?

On one occasion whilst discussing it during drinks with some colleagues he asked me whom I would support if India and England were playing a cricket match.

I think the place is perfect for the match because the Brabazon course (the Belfry has two other 18s, the Derby and the PGA National courses) is straightforward with no blind shots or hidden obstacles and so flat that you feel as if you're playing down a runway.

It usually is regulation that play is stopped if a facial injury is suspected by the referee, however given Koscielny's uncertainty on the basis of his injury, as well as the dramatic final moments of the match, I can see why both the referee and the players may have missed Koscielny down on the ground.

If Arsenal played like the last night's match against Ludogorets in this November, they will have bad results.

Arsenal always plays well if there is no heavy pressure from their opponent, unlike the previous matches against the other big teams.

I don't think people should just round on the names that they think are not good enough full stop because if you dissect the match Mert and Ramsey were very steady defensively speaking and were playing SMN and co..

So if this news is correct then Sanchez will be playing for Arsenal next season, which is clearly good news but it could turn out to be good only in the short term, because if we fail to match his ambition then he will be able to leave on a free next summer and the thought is that it would be to our Premier League rivals Chelsea.

It's going to be difficult to score three times because they have defended well in the tournament so far, but if you look at our past matches and the way we played against Manchester United last week, I think there's a chance we can still progress.»

We all know that if mou played a fundraising charity match against wenger he would start his strong side against us.

i wouldn't mind us getting Isco Isco can play from centre, right and left We do nt need a CAM but if Ozil gets injured we can use him in CAM and keep Cazorla in b2b He can start all the FA cup and League Cup matches And if Ozil god forbid decides to leave next season we have cover

You need to re-watch that match, if we had been playing well and Everton got lucky on those goals, it would have been better, but we just dropped off, started showing nonchalant attitudes in an important game under wenger's watch.

If we play a match where we are playing lazy and not into the match, if Wenger misplaces players in positions we could have another big losIf we play a match where we are playing lazy and not into the match, if Wenger misplaces players in positions we could have another big losif Wenger misplaces players in positions we could have another big loss.

If we play the Liverpool way or pochettino way (Southampton way), high pressing and quick passing game, we would have our entire squad injured just after 3 matches.

If the rest of the team starts playing well and starts banging in the goals, he would ease the pressure he puts on himself which in my opinion would allow him to keep his game simple at first and then build up the number of «moments of brilliance» match by match.

I think Canabry did very well he was everywhere gibbs did well too but to be honest I think we were weak I know half of the players didn't play together and it was a training match was glad to see the goal next Friday would be a different ball game all together and i will tune to it with interest if i find the link

I will be glad if we are to play before Liverpool and win to put more pressure on them cos I know they won't win their match....

If you look at match video you will see Le Coq breaking up City play, then playing simple ball to Santi.

We can not control the games consistently in this season, if we rely on players that play very well in one match but disappear in the other matches.

Seriously if ozil was in the team it wouldn't have made any difference to the scoreline.I think it is a blessing in disguise that he wasnt there.How many more games does he need to adapt to premiership only game he played good was against crystal palace in rest of matches he just made these ordinary passes.

Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the same people who claim to love him would come and be making noise about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.

We can win in Monaco If Wenger selects the best players for the match why didn't he play Monreal who was brilliant in the last matches?

I think Low knows why his not a regular at Arsenal and hinting to Padolski to joine a less of a club so he gets more regular football so when Germany decides to use him of the bench or if they have many injuries he will be match fit to play.

On top of that, they play something that looks like football, even if they get rinsed every now and then, whereas we shut down matches and slowly bleed the life out of them, then drop points to unworthy opponents anyway.

Theo is in form and that is bassed on more than 1 match, if you watch Arsenal regularly then you'll have noticed how well his movements have been EVERYTIME he has played since coming back from injury.

Honestly if Lacazette is as hard working as everyone says then with him and Alexis chasing down every ball and our new formation solidifying the back line and xhaka sure to improve in his second run in I think this formation with Alexis and Lacazette using speed to run off the link up play of giroud and the balls being played to all three of them by xhaka and Ozil we would score enough goals to win any match next season.

If Arsenal allow opposition teams a good foothold in the game as they seems to always do nowadays and continue to play with less than 50 % possession, they will have to score at least 3 goals or more per game to win matches.

So, if we want to win the EPL, i'd say we should be winning at least on of those matches, we also played Leicester

She had looked down the line and realized that if she graduated at 18, she would be stuck with a summer of amateur tournaments, which were all match play.

This is simple a very intelligent child can solve this problem.Firstly today our keeper was very poor however i know he will come good.By the way why is Paulista no getting his chance.What i have observed about arsenal since we signed Mertesacker from day one and since he started playing is that Mertesacker hardly gets involved you will usually see him a few times because he does not want to get caught out.e has always been a weak link in the defence even in his greatest performances here.When i see us playing with a high line and he is there i always laugh.It is just a mistake waiting to happen and i can tell u that it will happen again this season.Secondly why is Ramsey Cazorla and Ozil playing in the same line - up in a 4 -5-1 formation.That is just not right though it will win you some matches due to individual brilliance.It wont work at all.Lastly the least i say about Giroud the better i am not judging him on one game.One would imagine if he was not french and like chinese will he be getting these chances under Wenger.To me he will always be an average player and i will stand by my word even if he has good games.

The problem with us is that we can win against any of them just as much as we are capable of losing against them, we can be a real Jekyll and Hyde team, if we go out playing like we think we already won tonites match, we could easily get stunned by AC, when was the last time we won a home game in the knock out stages of a European tie, 6 or 7 years ago.

This group is not the type to believe in «morale victories» but they really did play pretty well and if not for just being over matched inside they'd likely be looking at W # 1 this season.

If you look closely DM rearely gets injured, Coq showed in every match he played that he up there with Matic in every aspect, Arteta vs Obi, i think thats preaty equal too, so no need to worry!

Would he have played three straight matches on Arthur Ashe if Nishikori, Wawrinka, and Murray were there to fill those primetime slots?

I've always maintained my stance that Arsene Wenger loves French players in his team than any other players.No matter how average you are once you're French and once you're in the first team he tends to give you so many chances to prove yourself.I can start mentioning them if you want me to but I know you know them.If Lucas Perez was French he wouldn't have been out so early believe me.I just don't know where to begin.Was Giroud bought to become a super sub or to be the leading striker?Having giving us many sesons of failure people are now content with him being a so called super sub.A player like Giroud is not built for that kind of role.He ws a super sub in 99 % of those matches because he was not played when he was supposed to and we needed presence in the air.The funny thing is people are using only this season to label him as a super sub.There were so many matched that Wenger should have started Giroud but for some reason didn't start him.I only see Arsenal as the top club who'd be crying over Giroud.If a good offer comes we should sell.

Winning all our remaining matches is not impossible if we concentrate specifically on each upcoming match and we play each match with hard work ethic and passion.

Playing 2/3 of a match is great if you want to get to pks and hope, but as last season showed us, you can't rely on that to carry you through.

Liverpool — Henderson — Gerrard Real — Modric — Kroos Don't get me wrong, we absolutely need a pure DM for tough matches — but spending 25M + + for extra depth in that position is really luxury Vidal is a versatile all around central midfielder — If we play 4 -2-3-1, let him pair with either Ramsey / Carzola and we have a very strong midfield base in both attack and defense.

This match being a PL match, I will prefer it if Le Prof plays a standard PL Gunners team against Watford tomorrow and not a makeshift team.

Having said that I really wish Arsene would NOT have his favourites like Rambo who he always selects even if he has to play him out of position!Annoys the hell out of me and it must be extremely disappointing for such as Joel who's shown he deserves to start every match.

spurs play good football under pochetino they are fast on the counter, their pressing is effective (remember z city match) if i'm not wrong this season they coincide few goals they have good defense in the league.

I also feel that a lot of people have gone a bit overboard in their slating of the defender, with some suggesting that his pairing with Koscielny just does not work, because he and the French international played very well together when Wenger gave them a run after Mertesacker's red card against Chelsea and he would have kept the pairing for the Leicester and Barcelona matches if Gabriel had not been unlucky enough to pick up a knock.

If De Gea could be the man of the match, it tells you we played very well.

rest of squad can play w the best, if you look at FBC, we match up everywhere until you get up top,

«If the spectators don't bowl after seeing a match,» says the ebullient Sanford, «they'll eat or play pool or something.»

I still don't see how he is a super sub.He's labelled as a super sub just because of this season.Those matches when he scored he was supposed to be played because we needed an aerial presence.A lot of those matches had he started we could've won because we needed aerial presence.But the thing is that his abilities don't suit him as a super sub.I mean he holds up the ball well and is great in the air and that's just about it.He's actually the one one who needs service and who needs players around him to open up defences for him to receive the pass and not vice versa.Super subs actually provide they are not the one's to be provided for.In Giroud's case he was supposed to start in those in matches as Sanchez was not up to the task in aerial battles.Giroud will not be able to affect a match if the opponents are as good in the air.