Sentences with phrase «play position which»

I can actual understand why Ox and Walcott are still there, they have made more contribution to arsenal than Wilshere (not really much) and they also play positions which do not have much competition.

Not exact matches

We realized that the candidates who didn't grow up in the U.S. spent up to 20 minutes just to understand how to play the game, which introduced new challenges as they competed for positions against candidates who grew up playing the game.

For me, «playing in my lane» means using my position as PwC's chairman and senior partner to drive conversations about race and diversity, to drive change and ask the hard questions within PwC and the profession in which we compete, and to have the discussion with other CEOs and corporate leaders.

The FMHR crew share their play on which athletic apparel company is best positioned to win the battle for sponsorships.

The governor's proposal to exempt sales tax on jet fuel will level the playing field with other states, position Hartsfield - Jackson Atlanta International Airport for continued growth and benefit companies throughout the state whose businesses depend on global air service, all of which will keep Georgia competitive for the years ahead.»

«While Wang has lost his power, his position and his freedom, the real losers here are investors who play by the rules, and our nation's financial system, which is diminished with every one of these schemes.»

To understand how BioLogos relates to other positions «in play» in our cultural conversation on origins, we have created the following categorical scheme into which most participants can be readily placed.

If abortion and related life issues are in fact the great civil - rights issues of our time» in that they test whether the state may arbitrarily deny the protection of the law to certain members of the human community» then Griswold eventually led to a situation in which the Democratic and Republican positions on civil rights flipped, with members of today's Democratic party playing the role that its Southern intransigents played during the glory days of the American civil - rights movement.

He takes up two themes: first, Bonhoeffer's understanding of the possible role philosophy can play in the theological enterprise (seen here in comparison to the position of Karl Barth, which is often, though reductively, thought to be a purely anti-philosophical stance); and second, the meaning of Christian community and its place in Bonhoeffer's thought.

Having listened to these positions and ob - served the importance which theological traditions play in their formulations, I will then look for direction as to how a renewed investigation of the Biblical data might proceed.

And his role is determined not by the whims of the moment but by assuming a particular position within English society, a position established by the ritual of ordination, which determines the role he is going to play.

While you're pleasuring or «making love» try signaling by sounds, words, or gestures which words, caresses, smells, motions, positions, or love - play you find most stimulating, and when you're ready to climax.

To summarize our own position as to the significance of knowledge of the historical Jesus for Christian faith, we are prepared to maintain (1) that the New Testament as a whole implies that Christian faith is necessarily faith in the Christ of the Church's proclamation, in which proclamation today historical knowledge may play a part, but as proclamation, not historical knowledge.

The «cheap, cheap» campaign confused loyal shoppers and played into the hands of Coles, which was better positioned to deliver on price.

«We have been led to believe that Ibrahimovic will play further and further away from the box in order totouch the ball more, leaving the striker position for Edi to fill, which was the case several times at the end of 2014 - 15.

Very true, playing Ramsey on the wing is an obvious sign that hes gone back 2 playing people ou of position to accommodate certain players.Playing Rambo on the wing is only a syptom of the real problem, which is Wenger himself

The Ox joined us from Southampton in 2011 but after six years at the Emirates, in which he only averaged playing half the League games in each season and was played in nearly every position as he was moved about by Wenger whenever he needed cover.

If we looked at the pre-season and opening game, the Ox was constantly moved between either wings or the wing back position and this does not do well with players in general who'd prefer a defined role and position in which they can play in.

He had played in his BEST position in which he produced 17 la liga assists in a season (right wing) as well as being lightning quick and the clubs best dribbler.

I disagree.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.Whether the Ox likes it or not he's been blessed with the qualities of a winger.To me that's his best position.He's only doing well as a wingback because of his attacking abilities.As I said earlier a wingback can be viewed as a sort of defensive winger.That's why CB's who are used as RB or LB can not play wingback.Wingback needs the player to be able to adapt himself like a winger while also being solid defensively.Ox has the attacking part but not the defensive part.With Bellerin we have the best of both worlds.He can attack, defend and also has the speed necessary to play wingback.I fear Ox being played at wingback will cost us when we play teams with tricky wingers.He should rather be challenging Sanchez or Ozil for their positions and not wingback.The guy hates to always have to defend which in truth he can't.

Who could challenge them??? Obviously COQZORLA will challenge them... Now, it seems Ramsey will never get chances to play in that CM position which is good for us..

He continued to play those 2 together and asked coquelin to play in advanced position, which he clearly wasn't capable of.

Simply by playing a strong side this week, which he can probably do without any worries this early in the season, could put Arsenal in a strong position that will allow him to be more carefree with team selection in the later clashes.

We don't need both of them together in a match, this also gives room for Ozil to play in his preferred position which is best for the team.

giroud plays well as a dm in his usual no9 position based on his «hold up play»... but don't mistake that gibberish with playing in midfield which requires more concentration and technique which the tall man does not possess at all... hed make a good defender though

I would not be surprised if Koscielny leaves during this transfer window, the news of his extension negotiations stalling has gone too quite, for my likings, which to me, would explain the sudden panic by Wenger in reinforcing this position, not only with signings but with Coquelin and Bielik also being converted to play there too....

Like other clubs Arsenal must be pumped with statistics on how players are performing, in which positions they perform best etc etc, yet Wenger seems to ignore all of this and deploy players who haven't been performing, or play them in the wrong positions.

who would of thought playing in a aggressive league in a position which requires alot of tackles an interceptions could mean a possible injury.

Despite this the boss still has a tough decision to make each week about whether to play Mesut Ozil, Santi Cazxorla and Alexis Sanchez altogether and if so, in which positions.

The only stories we've heard about are from clubs who will be fighting out mid table and relegation positions, which quite frankly is where he should be playing

Only the striker position he can play replacing Giroud, which is again a major call.

he rightly deserve that number 10 position behind the striker, which actually allows this arsenal team to play better, but it will be up to our RIDICULous manager.

Southgate is just shifting the blame to Wenger for not selecting jack, however, I think Jack days as a deep lying play maker is done with, because that position requires a lot of tackling and in his most recent games Wenger had used him higher up in an attacking role, which is more suited for his skill set.

Meanwhile, Liverpool boss Jurgen Klopp has been unable to rely on Alberto Moreno, which essentially has led to James Milner playing out of position all season and so a long - term solution at Anfield is required.

Yes we should win, as long as we're not over confident, and Wenger doesn't play people in the wrong position and uses the subs properly, which I think was the problem with the West Ham game.

He plays players out of position which leads to poor performances and loss in confidence..

If the intent was to convert him to a CF this should have started 5 years ago and by now he may have been a good CF.. At this point in my opinion, he should be played at the RW position, and I think the OX should start most games in the RW position which means that Theo should be a sub.

Which position did Lucas primarily play last season for his 17 goals and 10 assists?

You cant escape he fact that Podolski was played rarely and when he was he was played out of position much the same way that Wenger has assembled a squad of players most of which are a talented bunch, but, Wenger has failed to build a team who fit n with each other, we have a midfield that overtly populated with players who al excel in the same role BUT have no solid defensive midfield talent and no options in defence when players have crap periods or are long term injury problems.

Start theo against Sunderland.I really do not understand why mr wenger plays the likes of Ramsey on the wing which is a position he admits he is not at his best when he plays there.and you have a natural with the likes of Walcott warming the bench.

Arsenal currently have 2 positions which are weak links on the pitch striker (Giroud n walcott) n right wing (rambo) all 3 are in the wenger «faves list» so regardless of how they play are more less undroppable.

If he wishes to join Arsenal, he will have to take a wage cut, something I think which is quite likely to happen because the player himself has expressed his unhappiness at being no2 at PSG, being benched and played out of position.

You let it play out, you take a developmental tackle late and you make it a high priority in next year's draft which has better talent at the top at LT.. But that's my position bias talking.

But 4 -1-4-1 doesn't have a CAM position, which, I'm guessing, is why Özil and Cazorla have been played out wide.

In the primary opponent - adjusted categories above, Purdue ranked better than 72nd in only two of them: FP + (the field position generated for the offense, in which special teams plays a significant role — namely, kick returner Frankie Williams) and Passing Downs Success Rate +.

I feel like he was decent in the City game (not as bad as most people say) even though he played out of position, and he was bullied off by physically stronger opponents (which is case in alot of the PL games).

We're NOT linked now with anyone else and that's a worrying thing in itself, I personally really don't think Walcott is good enough to play that striker role and I know I'll get roundly «thumbed down» for this but its how I feel about the boy he's good but NOT as good as he thinks he is and it annoys me that theres a possibility that all the toing and froing around his contract may be stopping us from signing a top notch striker (and I DO NT think Martinez is this) I do feel that AW will opt for the cheap and second rate options again and this will also include not buying a striker and putting Walcott in this role, meanwhile all our rivals will be putting strong established players into the positions where they need to bull up their squads we are not well known for doing this and its not going to happen now, which is infuriating as this is the right time to break that mould and go for it!!

Five young men (average age 25) will play the other three infield positions, and no matter which combination plays, it will be good.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

Chambers started at CB (which is his natural position), played well, and then Wenger tried his best to completely destroy the poor kid, whilst at the same time losing us points, by shoving him out at RB, and keeping him there even though he was getting destroyed by almost every winger.