Sentences with phrase «play same style»

If I can complain about something, it would be the fact Arsenal try to play the same style of football regardless the conditions or opponents.
Looking at Guardiola's sides I get the feeling they don't have a plan B, that they just play their same style of football regardless, and mostly to high effect it has to be said.
Well everyone knows how Arsene will get the team to play so if Middlesbrough play the same style as West Brom and Palace then expect another lose and hopefully Wengers final chance.
He said, «Perhaps when you play the same style of football for many years you can tire of it and the football in England is very different.
He will play same style of football with no tactics.
fast pace physical team will crush arsenal, we have no answer, problem is spurs plays same style,
We haven't really played the same style as we used to recently, we're more defensive, more solid, and more successful, though we still play our trademark attacking way too.
wenger plays the same style every game lol again with ramsay on the right when he has theo in the bench.
Dortmund plays the same style regardless of opposition.
Maybe after years playing the same style you tire of it, and football there is very different.
Same STYLE doesn't mean same CLASS, I am playing same style of football with king henry and I am nowhere near pro.
Benzema is a big no no for me, overrated and plays the same style as Giroud.
White plays that same style and brings that element of physicality and fear across the middle.
The first man I would like to be replaced is OG, remember we had Chamak who played the same style with OG though Chamak was even more accurate with his header than this guy, very unfortunate Chamak was sorounded with more mediocry players than OG.

Not exact matches

Simeone certainly manages in the same style as he played and his teams are a reflection of that character, which is great if you want fight and desire but not so good for the fair play and sporting side of the game.
While Coquelin is obviously not on the same level yet, the playing style is pretty much the same.
that's Alexis» play style, he was the same at Barcelona, and a lot of south americans play the same way.
he has laid the cornerstone for future success under the next manager though, building a club from bottom to top with the same philosophy isn, t easy to do to get everyone on the same page with the playing style and formations, and to make it dogma is very hard indeed.
Then there is Klopp, who is in fact Wenger to a tee... same philosophy... impose your style... plays players out of position etc..
«You can not play 38 games in the same convincing style,» Le Prof continued.
I am absolutely no fan of Giroud style but when it comes to hold up play I can't see any other striker in EPL doing the same stuff Giroud is doing.
Personally I'll go with Mahrez for the following reasons: - Fits better into Arsenal playing style - younger player who would cost exactly the same - Prem experience (look what Kante brought to Chelsea) Sure Turan would bring some toughness that Marhez doesn't but not enough to justify going for him.
Arsenal's style of play will never change and therefore will have the same inherent weaknesses every season regardless of who comes in.
As reported by Metro the prolific striker had those same doubts about whether his style of play would be at odds with the way Arsenal play.
The Ferentz - Davis offense was known for playing the same type of bend - don't - break - plus style that the Iowa defense patented under Norm Parker.
Same play style, but Rodgers can throw a pinpoint pass 50 yards down field in mid stride.
if you are going to cut it at barca, you better be excellent in pocession, ball skills in tight space... he did not cut it, problem is we need the same skill set in our style of play, alexis would fit most systems, we rely on ball handling, crisp passing, small spaces, now he is struggling....
Messi may provide more assists than Ronaldo but it's easy to gel with a team when you've been playing in the same style, with the same teammates since aged 11.
I think his players would play with the same lacklustre style tonight, but I hope I am wrong and I wish to see an entertaining football
Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!
Arsenal will line up the same as always in a 4 -2-3-1 formation against every side because Wenger is still the same, all the top managers have Wenger's number because he doesn't adapt the teams playing style according to our opponents from week to week, he thinks the so - called Arsenal way is the best way for every game even though we'll face different teams with different managers!
The team who imposes their style of play on their opponent, the hardest, wins... Barca still plays the same way Cruijjf set them up to a few decades ago.
Mexico didn't experiment, and that's fine - Miguel Herrera has talked about wanting his team to be more versatile, but they played the same formation and style as they always have under him tonight.
I must say since tme of rvp, arsenal havent had a world class striker.when likes of rvp, arshavin played; u expected the team to always hav a chance whoever.i guess u cant say the same of giroud.attitude-wise and overall Giroud is a good player, but not suited for arsenal style....
Welbeck have peak there is nothing more to come from him, he plays in the same fashion as he did at Man U in his six year stay he follows no system and style.
Iwobi, on the other hand, is more of an Ozil type of player so if Wenger wants to keep the same sort of system and style of play we are used to then he might prefer the youngster.
The way he plays is exactly the same way as he has ever played, that's his style.
Theo Walcott and Olivier Giroud provide such a huge contrast in playing styles that most defenders find it perplexing when made to face the two players in the same game!
Man, you are contradicting yourself saying he wont get injured playing as a deeplying playmaker then saying his playing style makes him prone to injuries.the point i am trying to make is wether he plays as a striker, dm, cam, winger etc, he would always sustaing injury because of the same reason you gave - his playing style
There are some result oriented managers who are following the same approach of Wenger and fit enough to Arsenal style of play.
I support you on the fact that Araenal need a player who can make an immediate impact.However, it's also naive to try to create an impression that he's going to fail due to similar playing style and stature of the players you mentioned above.Even Eduardo would have world class and possibly better than Van Persie if not for his leg breaking.It's likely Mbappe is going to succeed and if he gets signed up by another club we'll be chasing him on the future.The same gamble being taken on Mbappe is the same that was taken on Henry.If Henry had failed I don't think Arsenal would've been this great club today.This is a very similar situation to Mbappe.Weneed players now to have an immediate impact but we should not be inclined to think Mbappe would fail if Arsenal should sign him.
Wenger always looks for a specific style of play in his strikers and Welbeck wasn't entirely of the same ilk.
playing with g - rod up front is like sticking to fingers up to traditional arsenal play of fast movement one twos and pass and move football this is very unlike wenger to make such a major shift away front his normal trends of style of play big man up front with no pace just isn't the wenger way really he needs to go back to the past really to answer the current problem i have noticed all the other top 4 teams are more wenger they are (wengerites to coin a phrase) than wenger himself playing with a big srtong pacey team like we use to have they all copied wengers blueprint and left him behind somewhere along the line and he altered his and its not been the same since do nt change a winning system of power and pace if it is was working for you mr wenger
What concerned me the most is that despite the change in the formation, our style of play still remains the same!
Van Persie and sanchez are not the same type of players so we can not say any replacement has to be the same style player, what is the common denominator in both cases they had team mates who adapted their game to both attackers style of play.
Same style of play and vision, even the body size.
Until our style of play is improved whoever comes in it will still be the same old Arsenal.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
«Almost everyone plays for the same club so we're kind of used to the same sort of style, but the thing we are trying to get used to is how each individual player plays,» Arnaudon said.
As both are of almost the same style of play: agressive, good last ditch tackle and make some overzealous errors.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z