Sentences with phrase «played imo»

I mean the game sounds much better than it played imo.

He should have never played IMO, not worth to risk our season in the first game.

Depending on which it is I think you'll see us get someone who can be a ST or a wide forward to let Welbz play as ST.. But who we get is linked with where Welbz is going to play IMO.

If you have that hard working quick and interchanging front 3 and the DM who can bring the ball out properly I think we are a match for anyone but those 2 things didn't come together enough yesterday and was enough to upset the whole balance of our play IMO.

I have play for a long time Diablo I, II then L2 for years and after that Aion, Forsaken World have elements from this 3 games I play in the past, and it's awesome if u like the above games then u must play it imo it's the best free mmorpg.

Not exact matches

IMO anyone owning individual stocks is playing a fool's game in the first place.

The difference IMO is that in corporate America I can be like «oh, my boss is an asshole and I have to pretend to kiss his ass because it's all a game and this is how it's played.»

However, the increasing «religiosity» being played out in the political arena is, IMO, a blatant breach of the Const.itution!

He might play decent particularly at first but he will not die for the team any longer IMO.

IMO Ramsey was the reason we played bad yesterday.

I really do nt understand, they were play great IMO, they try harder and make a 2 goal to the less conceded team in CL.

that why i said i am actually concerned we don't finish top 4 this season, i was crucified as a trader, negative, et... truth is, i am concerned, the top team are playing well, the top class mngrs are settling in, pep, mou, klopp... chelsea is 12 up on us, spurs score w more conviction than us... its a ligit concern, imo

Yes we have players that can play Ozil's role but they will be much less effective than Ozil and the team as a whole will be severely weakened IMO.

I would like to switch back to a 4 -3-2-1 from our 3 -4-2-1, then we could play 3 CM's and dominate the midfield, a 2 CM - axis cant dominate the MF imo and i just love formations which have 3 CM's Cech Bell Mus Kos Kol Xhaka Rambo Elneny Özil Sanchez Lacazette

I'm sure loyal as a dog Wenger will keep playing him though — big mistake imo

I know some have them doing something similar but instead getting Lamar Jackson early 2nd round but imo he's just too fragile and frail to play QB in the NFL — he actually would be another RG3 imo.

I have said a few times that MN has potential and I want to see more of him, not only because he has impressed me when played with the 1st team (ok not great but still very good profress IMO) but because he can play RM as well.

IMO I have seen Chaimbers perform better in the middle as a CD than as a right back, so to move him just infron of the central defenders might suit him better then playing out on the right.

IMO everyone in the chasing pack is playing for second, third, fourth already, incl United.

IMO, his performance on the field demands a full time role at 2B / 3B and occasionally SS until he plays himself out of it or a truly better option comes along.

The ties over, so I would try to win the game but the players are only playing for the shirt imo, it's not impossible, but highly improbable they have a mean defense, let's cement 3rd and retain the fa cup (relatively poor) I know because of the expectation and all the noise the club was making last summer but its a slight improvement.

Against the Flames, he may have played his best game of the season IMO.

But yeah, imo cash in on Walcott — get the Ox playing more regularly and then buy a promising right winger to fill in the gap — we already have a few who can play walcott's position anyway.

If Gabriel plays our chances sky rocket IMO.

Let's face it we can not disagree with Wenger that Ozil is a better play maker than Ramsey as is Santi IMO, but we can question Wenger for playing players out of position.

I always thought he was going to be a great RM, a bit like Ljungberg with a bit more craft to his passing but the formation change doesn't play to his strengths imo.

He has been serviceable when playing, but does not possess the skill of elite players at that position IMO.

IMO, diaby was to much gift than wilshere... the truth is wilshere jas a nice dribble an avereage pass and an awfull shoot... he has a lot of energy and playa with his hearth... the last was the best of his qualities... he is a fan, so he can die for the team... but talking about football quality, diaby was a lot better... diaby was absoulutly outstanding each time he plays... inteligent player, dribbling, pace, strenght, great pass, great shot... losing him was a very low kick, one of those things that wenger was not guiltt but victim (one of just a few)

(Same with Teddy IMO who played outdoors his first two seasons)

Ospina is better (imo), and he possibly could play week in week out at a top club.

Gabriel played ahead of Chambers who imo is better suited to play with Koscielny..

Most notably IMO when he is played out wide.

Wynn is better than Hernandez imo because hes more consistent and will give up less bad plays then Hernenadez while Hernendez will make more wow plays due to his «mean streak» but give up a few more bad ones than Wynn.

I really liked the play calling by Chryst, hit those screen passes which would have pretty much all gone for big yards, and then they would have been exposed IMO.

I think the playing of mind games where Wenger says we are not looking for a striker and then makes a bit behind the scenes for a striker has no beneficial impact on price IMO.

Not only didn't we get the results (at least one win against any of those 3 would mark a champion IMO) we also didn't play up to our potential or for 90 minutes.

playing chambers at holding mid would be a little risky today IMO.

If this is true then schneiderlin would be a very good signing IMO and we will then have two excellent holding midfielders le coq and morgan to rotate and also to play both of them in tough games like chelsea at bridge next season etc so he would be welcome addition otherwise go for kondogbia or wanyama tall tough strong physical players and they will give players like matic and yaya toure run for their money..

Flamini, Arteta and Rosicky played very little for us last season... We've brought in Elneny and Xhaka which is a serious upgrade IMO.

It's a bit much to label him not good enough because he has shown the ability to be a quality player imo, but I think he needs a bit more regular playing time and a more defined role.

IMO we play much better with faster strikers and a faster game.

The only issue I have is our CF position, IMO, Sanchez shouldn't start this one, let Perez start as he hasn't played much while Sanchez has just returned..

He's going out on loan anyway so him playing in a FA Cup match wouldn't be such a gamble IMO.

While seeing Monreal play central CB has been painful we must remember that our def kept 50 % clean sheet after formation change and that is a good consistency IMO.

Le Coq is a bit too short to play CB IMO

He would also fail miserably IMO because he only knows one style of play and would not get enough time with the England team to install that playing style.

IMO Liverpool are less talented than we are but they play for 90 minutes.

Wales played with so much heart against Slovakia and IMO that was the most entertaining match so far.

obviously welbz played for the motivational factor which can often work but apart from the silver platter delivered gift from Valencia IMO he wasn't in the game.

IMO Gabriel played well for being left on bench so often.