Sentences with phrase «played dynamic wingers»

Not exact matches

We had pacy / dynamic wingers on the wing, central players playing centrally, and most importantly a proper DM sitting at home in the hole.

So you would think our manager would recognize that we don't have any natural wingers, and therefore not play a shape that benefits from having natural dynamic wingers?

Positives Our defence has a leader with wealth of experience Creativity in abundance Ramsey still has licence to make late runs to the box Xhaka and wilshere both play 6s taking turns to hold and doing the dirty work Sanchez and Ozil switching wings havoc through crossing or cutting inside Lacazette being provided for Giroud our option from the bench Negatives Ozil playing as a winger wouldn't defend (mustafi will provide cover as he wouldn't overlap as much as bellerin) No Giroud Lacazette dynamic combination (would still happen by subbing wilshere caution for injuries Ramsey moves to 8 lacazette plays behind Giroud) Slow and aging metserker (makes up for with football brain and also pacy wing backs) No outright cdm (wouldn't need one as no overlapping wing backs to cover as creativity is enough ufront would concentrate on defending

For me Arshavin or Diaby, they both doesn't fit in the midfield trio or winger role.They are more like scoring Hleb, playing behind striker attracting defenders, creating space, dynamic with their runs or pure finishing and with minimal defensive responsibilities.A 4 -3-1-2 CF players.

@Demetrio, Arshavin is absolutely a good buy for us.I started to re-watch again all the Arsenal games that I have in copy (as I really missed that beautifull game we used to play since the starting of this season, Its just wonderfull to see Fab spoiling TH with Fabulous passes)-RRB- since 2004, and Ive concluded that one of the biggest lack on our game was that good dynamic fast winger, the like of Ljunberg, Bergkamp, Rosicky, Hleb, Robert pires, durin the times of Asley cole etc..