The following season
he played less minutes, 1213, but still managed to score 6 times and finish the season with 5 assists and an 81 % pass success rate.
So I don't see the disappointment in his performance, apart from not scoring, and I won't remind
u he played less minutes than Ozil and the rest.
the highest scorer per minute, coz
he played less minutes since Sanchez moved to the middle.
If
he played less minutes and did not have to start everytime in his own zone I see his numbers going up as well (obviously).
However, how can Lacazette improve if
he plays less minutes than other top strikers.
If he were to start for the Kings, he could potentially
play less minutes (~ 20), which would allow for Temple / Bogs / Malachi / Jackson to soak up the remaining 28 minutes.
Then I'd like to see a third line of Shore, Spezza and Nichushkin that
plays less minutes and has heavy OZ starts.
Despite
playing less minutes, he scored the same amount of goals and had more assists than David Silva last season and costs significantly less.
James Milner managed 5 goals and 7 assists in a far stronger attacking outfit, admittedly
playing less minutes.
Not exact matches
The gambling can be done at any time, on any device, with average
playing round lasting
less than a
minute.
In this video, Wagner discusses the Relative Strength Breakout
play in a short (
less than 3
minutes) video:
Curry is the first NBA player ever to average more than 30 points a game while
playing less than 35
minutes a game (he'd often sit out at the end of games because they were blowouts).
I did 12
minutes with NPR but could have probably done
less or released pressure sooner (will
play with it).
Then posted stats from the year he averaged 3 blocks a game (# 1 in the league), tied with Serge Ibaka and was careful to point out he
played 10
minutes less a game than Serge.
When you push the score up to an 11 - point lead with
less than 2
minutes to
play, and Houston out of TOs you pretty much put it out of reach.
You could also say that up until Alexis Sanchez doubled the lead with
less than 20
minutes on the clock the Gunners had been guilty of wasting a number of chances and failing to capitalise on our control of the game and superior
play.
Facing a 33 - 32 deficit, Ertz made the biggest
play of the game for the Eagles by catching a pass and diving into the end zone for a go - ahead touchdown with
less than three
minutes left in the game.
Bayern Munich want Olivier Giroud It seems Robert Lewandowski want Bayern Munich to sign a backup striker so that he can
play 20
minutes less every game, which sounds like the perfect job for supersub Olivier Giroud.
The catch rule bit the Falcons with
less than four
minutes to
play in the fourth quarter.
He is drifting in and out of games
less this season and his stats are pretty good for the
minutes played.
Chris Paul
played substantially
less minutes and games than Kyle Lowry, but I'm giving him the nod in honor of Houston's dominance.
Many times ive seen the line has moved only
minutes (sometimes
less then 1 min) after
plays were released.
Buried in a Puerto Rican roster full of veterans, they
played sparingly in Atlanta, averaging
less than 16
minutes per game apiece and four and eight points per game, respectively.
-- In Serie A the player invented by Tavecchio really does exist: a group who came in from abroad and
played less than 100
minutes.
It's now 28 - 7 Patriots with
less than two
minutes to
play.
The outcome is
less playing time than necessary, which then initiates a perpetual cycle; being of a lower quality than the existing striker results in
less minutes on field, which leads to
less confidence, resulting in a seemingly even lower quality.
For teams coming from low - lying areas, it can be quite an ordeal
playing a full 90
minutes when there is much
less oxygen available than they are used to.
With four
minutes left in the game, the Raptors offense went cold, and Garnett and Pierce — who had
played very poorly by their standards for the entire game — each hit big shots to give the Nets a six point lead with
less than two
minutes to go.
Clemson countered with a six -
play touchdown drive to pull within five with
less than a
minute left, but the Tigers ran out of time.
The final
play of Ravens - Browns was only slightly
less absurd than the two
minutes that preceded it.
Unfortunately for the fans at Anfield, Crystal Palace had a clutch scorer of their own in Scott Dann, who gave Alan Pardew's side the win with
less than 10
minutes to
play.
The touchdown they scored to tie the game with
less than four
minutes to
play, however, shouldn't have counted.
Kentucky did get the ball back with
less than a
minute left, and they were able to get into field goal range, but a holding call negated a
play that would have set up an easy game - winning field goal.
And if he's
playing less than 20
minutes it's hard to do that.
Both Sullinger and backup Evan Ravenel
played less than six
minutes in the first half against the Orange after picking up two early fouls.
But 6 to 7 years ago, all young players were getting many first team opportunity in the form of substitution, CL matches were we already topped the group with couple of group matches to be
played, PL matches where we already won like 4 - 0 score with 30
minutes to go against
lesser team, Carling cups etc..
IMO Liverpool are
less talented than we are but they
play for 90
minutes.
In other words, Ospina concedes
less goals, makes more saves per goal conceded and has more clean sheets per 90
minutes played.
Look Leicester were
less talented than we were but they
played as a team for 90
minutes.
Wenger again blamed the World Cup for his lack of
playing time, although Podolski was hardly stretched with
less than 100
minutes playing time in Brazil.
The German giants, who had appeared to
play within themselves in the first leg, stormed out of the blocks and were 2 - 0 win within
less than 10
minutes of the second.
He scored the winner against Anderlect and again,
played less than 10
minutes.
Extremely unlucky not to score twice today (and yet he
played less than 10
minutes).
According to the frighteningly up - to - the -
minute Earthquake Track website, San Francisco has
played host to no
less than 583 earthquakes in the last year — 10 alone within the past 7 days!
Mourihno rarely rotates players, just check out the
minutes played by his 1st 11, he has a favoured team and he sticks with them unless injured BUT they get injured a lot
less than we do.
Format is: - Name, goals
less penalties,
minutes played,
minutes per goal Aguero, 15, 1777, 118 Lukaku, 17, 2419, 142 Kane, 16, 2735, 171 Giroud, 11, 1939, 176 Vardy, 15, 2718, 181 Ighalo, 14, 2565, 183 Mahrez, 12, 2455, 204
Coquelin had more interceptions, more tackles won, more airiel duels (I'm even shocked at that one), More ground one on one duels and coquelin
played 300
less minutes than him, the only thing he beat him on was the fact that he had more assists 3 and more goals 2 that's not really something to be impressed by.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of
play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a
less than stellar «plug and
play» mentality where players
play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th
minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance
play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted
play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was
playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched
played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball
play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he
played with Coq Wenger always seemed to
play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been
played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Let me just add, in 5 of those 13 matches he
played 60
minutes or
less.
The difference between this year and last is that WCS
played more
minutes, got much more touches (due to the system), and took more,
less efficient shots.