With reports that Arsenal are looking at left backs and Gibbs future at Arsenal uncertain, this could be the year to see Wenger getting a younger
player with great promise to cover for the aging Monreal, someone who has promise and also the attributes to step into the team when required.
# 10.6 million is thought to be enough to sign him, and could be a good deal for
player with great promise.
Not exact matches
his haters maybe just want to watch him do beautiful play and freestyle football i for one believe ballon dor is not beyond him.thats why i hate comparing him to other
players like silva iniesta and others.he will be a massive hit i
promise you that when he finds
great understanding
with his teammates he can clock a record of assists
He is a
great player but
with our own Giroud in
great form and still improving at centre forward and
with great options up front in Alexis, Walcott and Welbeck, as well as
promising young strikers like Akpom, Campbell and Sanogo trying to break through, I don't see a striker as a big transfer priority for the summer, especially if it is going to use up the lion's share of our budget.
I think Mustafi has the qualities to be a
great defender.But I also think Gabriel can even be better and can be Koscielny 2.0 and he will be a key
player and an Arsenal
great you mark my words.People write off some
players with promise too early.I also think Perez should start this Saturday and the coach should not breastfeed his favourite son to start.
You are happy
with players who start a season
with great promise only to fade away during the crucial parts of the season.
I know there is thousands of Arsenal transfer rumours linking us
with big - name
players, but Arsene Wenger also has a
great track record of buying extremely
promising youngsters at good prices, and one of those bids last summer was for the excellent Celtic left - back Kieran Tierney, who was the subject of a # 10million bid from Arsenal last summer.
That gives us
great confidence heading into the summer, where we can lure top
players with trophy
promises and Champions League football.
Titled Mysteries of Egypt, it came
with the
promise that Assassin's Creed Origins
players will «experience the Mysteries of Ancient Egypt — uncover lost tombs, explore the
Great Pyramids, and discover the secrets of mummies, the gods, and the last pharaohs».
This D&D experience
promises accessibility for all
with great depth lurking in the shadows for those interested
players.
At the same time, Sony turned things around
with PS3, releasing some
great new IPs, coming up
with excellent value for money PS +, so many Xbox
players jumped over, and after the disastrous announcements for the new XBO, which were all very anti-consumer, and Sony
promising they wouldn't be doing any of that BS (
with an epic E3 take - down), most gamers never even looked back at Xbox.
I think the universe holds such a potential for
great multi
player Large fleets space ship battles were never ever
promised and in most previews even journalists said most space battles are very straight forward I agree
with you on controls I agree
with you on planets and plants I believe the game requires too big of grind The game lacks variety The game lacks a clear vision and clear story All of the planets bases look the same Every planet you do the same thing So as you see I am not defending the game in any sense but I do have an issue
with gamers having this imaginations of what they wanted and the developers had a different vision http://www.geek.com/games/n... Please read this article.
Aside from «Open World Survival Horror», few genres have been done to death more than the rogue - like,
with randomly created worlds replacing crafted levels and
promising greater length to a game
with player death a constant threat.
Ubisoft expected
players to turn on each other but it seems the penalty for going rogue was much too
great for many, especially
with the
promise of so little reward.