Sentences with phrase «players as wingbacks»

Not exact matches

They have to be able to recognise that he's still 20 years old, and as such he can't be an auxiliary wingback and an effective winger and an explosive No. 10 and a line - leading frontman and the most dangerous player on the pitch.

I disagree.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.Whether the Ox likes it or not he's been blessed with the qualities of a winger.To me that's his best position.He's only doing well as a wingback because of his attacking abilities.As I said earlier a wingback can be viewed as a sort of defensive winger.That's why CB's who are used as RB or LB can not play wingback.Wingback needs the player to be able to adapt himself like a winger while also being solid defensively.Ox has the attacking part but not the defensive part.With Bellerin we have the best of both worlds.He can attack, defend and also has the speed necessary to play wingback.I fear Ox being played at wingback will cost us when we play teams with tricky wingers.He should rather be challenging Sanchez or Ozil for their positions and not wingback.The guy hates to always have to defend which in truth he can't.

If you look at how we attacked other teams in pre season then the wingbacks will be recognised as a big part, they was the players who was looking to get past his man and drive the attack.

I've realised people are confusing fullback and wingback assuming them to almost be the same.A wingback can be viewed as a more defensive winger whiles a fullback is just a player put near the sides of the centre fullback.Their roles are clearly very different and well defined.That's why you'll consider Ox at RWB and not RB.We need to switch back to 4 -2-3-1 to get the best out of our players like Ozil, Ox, Kolasinac, Bellerin and Monreal.They'll suffer a lot under 3 -4-3.

Walcott, under this pattern will now be with more encouragement to look for the crosses from the wingbacks as well as the infield players who are world class in Sanchez and Ozil.

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

Times when our defenders got outnumbered it was midfielders wingbacks wingers and pers partner at fault just as much as the big man himself, per did hash things up a few times ie the ducking but hes not the only Arsenal player who has had form best forgotten and he certainly wont be the last.

I think the English players can fill the wingback positions, because they are usually very athletic and fast, as long as they are given the chance to play in some matches.

Perhaps Wenger thought of Ozil - Sanchez partnership as Maradona, Messi, Cristiano, Berkamp and Henry all rolled into two and would survive the removal of one attack - minded player who was transferred to defense in the latest 5 - defender setup with three in the back and two wingbacks who could also add in attack.

A versatile, reliable player, he has mostly been used as a wide midfielder or wingback, though he was employed in the centre of midfield in both legs of the game against Östersunds.

Welbeck used to ply his trade in Manchester as a left player, possibilities that Wenger promised him centre forward role to sign up can not be ruled out but he can match foot to foot the energy Oxlade Chamberlain has on the right wingback.

Flo is so much better playing as a wingback, and we take advantage of our best MF players.

It sort of work towards the end of last season cos Chamberlain was deployed as our wingback and Monreal manning the other wing but now with Bellerin and Kolasinac (very predictable players with no set skills) it's affecting us seriously.

Barcelona's most interesting player on the night was their left wingback Neymar who morphed from a wingback to a wide forward as Barcelona advanced the ball towards PSG's goal.

Walcott might not have the most all around game but he does have a knack for scoring goals, Gibbs as a former winger did a decent job as a wingback, Coq wasn't fluent but won the ball well and stopped some dangerous looking counters at source, and Bellerin looked like a refreshed player.

Outside of Depay, a player who can operate as a wingback, like Cuadrado, would be excellent.

But Le Prof will have to be making the very correct Arsenal PL games starts and bench week in week out during the season campaign and deviates from unnecessarily playing his players out of their correct positional place of playing like switching Bellerin to play left wingback instead of to play him as right wingback.

The injuries to Zouma and Terry in quick succession have left Chelsea light at the back, with Gary Cahill likely to be paired alongside a youth player or a player who is more commonly used to playing in a wingback position, such as Branislav Ivanovic or Cesar Azpilicueta.