Sentences with phrase «players for positions»

And, Wenger did nothing to sign players for positions.

@whenseen anger, I agree with your view but problem is if you buy striker, cb and may be RW and still loose then at least you will not repent at the end that what if we bought WC players for these positions.

Cazorla, Ozil, Ramsey and Jack can rotate in that central area, I don't think playing any of them wide is a good idea as we have more dedicated players for those positions.

It's ok to want certain players for positions to improve the team but, by the look of the weaker ones we need at least 6 just to make the squad.

I don't believe in anything Wenger says but still do we have all top - quality players for all positions.

If we go out, we will not be able to buy any of the players for the positions you mention and we may even have to lower our wage bill.

Trying to fit, convert players so they make up a team as opposed to having a system of play and then finding the best / specialist players for those positions.

I'm not that worried about spending, I'm worried about getting players for positions in which we are clearly deficient.

I wish Wenger could have got known proven players for the positions we need to fill ie.

Right now those are the best players for the positions.

The Hawks will still have Jeff Teague, Paul Millsap and Kyle Korver, three above - average players for their positions.

Arsenal have already signed a midfielder of course but that is the area of the pitch that has been the hardest hit by our injury problems, and so we are still being linked with various other players for those positions.

We need to sign at least 6 top players for these positions: CB CM - B2B CM - DM Ozil replacement Alexis replacement Another top forward

Acquisition of high quality players for the positions we need will only help us be the best.

He's buying players for positions we don't need, we all know a DM and pure CF are required, we may hate the pundits for speaking the truth but there's no way this squad will win the title or Champions league

But your company, especially if it's a startup, might not have the financial ability to hire A players for every position.

Arsenal now have 2 top quality players for every position and in some cases 3, we should be looking at playing the fittest players in their best position in every game and then when everyone is at the same level then sent le into the best x1, but rotation is still important to.keep up the fitness.

No, we need a top quality centre back to partner Koscielny because to be honest Koscielny's injury record isn't that great either (he's missed 22 games in the last 2 seasons), so we need at least 2 top players for that position to cope with the inevitable injuries / suspensions / fatigue.

We should have a minimum of 2 players for each position.

Are prob is having a good player for every position but average backup.

Has not had a chance to string multiple games together and is challenging players for a position in attack which has developed an understanding and is clicking well.

Wenger also tells us it's difficult to find a quality player yet, it doesn't appear to happen to the other top teams, they get their man usually and the team usually have 2 or 3 players for each position.

somthe answer is we're nowhere near them maybe usmanov is right we need world class players in every position maybe wingers 2 year projection would allow us to do this by only signing world class / X11 players for position needed.

We are once again dragging our feet on our biggest need and we sign a talented player for a position which was reasonably well covered by Coq and Elneny.

That's the benefit of having a squad where you can boast having two players for each position, a standard for any top side (which make a mockery of Jose Mourinho's and Pep Guardiola's recent complaints about the League Cup getting in the way).

They all mostly have competition in that club, some of it is due to having two players for each position..

Have to say we now look like we could have 2 genuine decent players for each position.

There is no need to gamble at time of the league, let give Maitland - Niles a chance and i know he will perform well in that position than other crop of players for that position.

Cautious because of Kos??? What ever happened to Wenger's own rule — 2 quality players for every position.

they spend and there is competition for places.If you have 2 players for each position like they do then we are talking about.

Mistamonn most of the time his playing players out of position is because we don't have the necessary depth of players for each position specially on the left, the team is always out of balance he rely needs to buy W / C if not top players in key positions, last year i was commenting that we needed a striker before a class DM but i was so wrong, we first need the best DM that money can buy no mater how much then and only then we can look for another class DM and a couple of descent defenders.

One player mention (Monreal) what happens when players get too familiar with each other, they get comfortable, complacent and lack hunger, because the majority lack competition in the squad and also some playing are base on favoritism, so some position are safe guarded by not buying proper players for that position or buying none at all.

2 players for each position will cover for injuries.

Once Wenger chooses a player for a position, he keeps him there until he is injured, Giroud unable to play, it will be Wellbeck.

Your obsession with having at least two top quality players for every position does not work in the real world unless you live in the world of Man City, Real, Barca, and Bayern to some extent.

totally we need 3 players for every position....

Your second or third choice player for any position is not going to be as good as the 1st X1 guy — it is sort of logical don't you think?

Why can't we play our 11 best players for each position?

If we qualify for Champions league, and if we want to win EPL + + next year we need to have 2 top players for each position.

We practically have 1 great and 1 good / decent player for each position.

Almost two world class players for every position covered.

This is a manager who will turn mountains to bring an injury prone striker instead of getting a world class player for the position... And then he tells us we are lucky as he could have stayed home and Welbeck would have been brought to the club.

We had plenty of money in the 13/14 season, top of league then as well, and badly needing quality reinforcements in January, and what did Wenger do... he signed a rubbish injured player for a position that didn't even need strengthening.

I honestly think we are just 2 players short of a decent starting and back up x1 and have enough depth in the squad to give us a strong 25 plus 8 decent youngsters to genuinely give us 3 players for each position, with 3 slightly different formations

Defence: Two players for each position?

So much for that «2 quality players for each position» idea that Wenger has always touted.

If Wenger doesn't buy 2 world class players for every position on the pitch then I really can't see me watching them again.

But then, surely your conclusion ought to be that Wenger bought the wrong sort of player for the position in which we have BADLY needed top quality for the last decade, since Gilberto left, in CDM.

Not loan or sell anyone without making sure we have players for that position.

I to would be sad to see the Ox go but Matic is a quality player for a position we lack quality in.