Sentences with phrase «players more fees»

More higher you sell players more fees you'll get.

Not exact matches

Along with other industry players, they will speed up the transition to more fee - based advisory.

He would keep him as manager but just make him more accountable and leave some decisions to others and I believe make him do the managers job properly whilst player recruitment and setting fees and wages is left to others.

The Blues are said to be hoping to bring in the pair for a combined fee of # 47m (# 30m for Stones and # 17m for Rahman, says the Star), but it may be that they will have to pay more if they are to persuade the players» respective teams to sell.

Buying another player + company, agent fees including his wages and salaries would cost more than what Ozil or Sanchez is demanding.

Another example: Coquelin is clearly great, yet because they heard so former player earn his keep by criticizing him (Thierry Henry sadly lowered himself to that level recently) they «know» he's not a good player and must be replaced (it's even worse because he didn't cost 50 million in transfer fees so that they'd know he was good as it's well - known that the more expensive the fee, the better the player [cough] DiMaria [cough] Falcao [cough]-RRB-.

City were the first to really dish out the big bucks, che paid big transfer fees but city paid some average English / foreign players more than what some Barca players were on.

Mark O'Meara's heart beats true for the red, white and blue, but that doesn't mean he'll work for peanuts — which is why he's leading a lobby of players, from both teams, who think they should get more than a token fee to play in this week's Presidents Cup.

Wenger said last year that with the ever - increasing transfer fees and wage demands, he thought there would be more and players running down their contracts and using the Bosman rules.

Wenger is notoriously stingy with Arsenal's money and has only spent more than # 30m on two players — Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil — fees confirmed by The Express.

If an increase in salary is only going to cost 5 - 7 % of the allowed wage structure than I say sure do it as it would cost more to pay a transfer fee and a new salary for a player matching the caliber of either player.

DENIAL that the squad remains weighed down by players who are not the right standard and are paid too much meaning that other more suitable Clubs don't want them DENIAL that the only reason Ozil is likely to sign a new contract is down to the fact that no other Club would pay him the same salary on top of any form of transfer fee (same as the «deadwood really»..

@mohawk It's more like the agents are playing on the gullibility of the social media sheep (media outlets included) by creating interest in their players, who have all happened to land somewhere for hefty enough price tags and fees... AFC has been «agent bait» for the longest.

We are still a club with no benefactor to bankroll us so the books have to be balanced.That is a way of life that we must live with and accept.But from now on there can be little or no excuses in the players we buy.Wengers control in these matters have been taken from him so the emphasis and accountability lies with Ivan Gazidis and his new teams.We can't get things wrong.Big and better players cost more in fees and wages so it's certainlg going to be interesting.

oh and i forgot Gaitan as well: S It sure does... But the player I'm hinting towards is more versatile than both and could cover / start in both of our weakest positions... Would also be less in wages and transfer fees than both combined.

READ MORE Kane, Hazard, Coutinho: 50 players who would surely command a # 100m transfer fee, including Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd stars The alarming stats that show Jurgen Klopp should be worried about his job safety at Liverpool Liverpool transfer news

Once the summer transfer window shut, I said to my friends «in January Wenger will sign an unknown youngster for a small fee, and more experienced player for the squad, but not for the starting line - up».

Oh how I wish it, would work like that.Didn't Souhampton sold their three star players for a fee more than 20 mil?

The PL title was being won by chelsea, manu or manc, all clubs with more money than us to spend on players transfer fees and wages.

So although Higuain or any other player might cost a little bit more than double Wellbexks # 16 million fee they would still deliver double the goals and would perhaps be the difference between us finishing 3rd to 1st?

Arsenal had been negotiating with Basel for the last 8 months for Elneny and his transfer fee is said to be more than the reported fee (# 7 million) the true cost is kept between the two clubs so that Basel don't get held to ransom when they enter the swiss market to buy players.

If reports in media about # 100 mil was true and extra from player sales then the math suggests we need to sell a couple / few more players before we can go for Lemar and Seri after spending an upfront fee of around # 45 mil for Lacazette.

All of Wenger's disastrous plans when it comes to transfers, both incoming and outgoing, are coming home to roost... why would anyone pay a significant fee for a player that was hardly used, is overpaid and has a spotty injury record; not to mention the fact that Wenger nickels & dimes everyone when it comes to transfers so it only makes sense that other teams would do likewise when dealing with us... the fact is I wouldn't be surprised if Wenger does this so that players won't be moved thereby giving him a ready - made excuse not to spend more money on transfers; there's a reason why the latest headlines regarding Arsenal transfers seem to suggest that we aren't bringing anyone in until some players are sold or moved elsewhere on loan... we know this club knows how to utilize press coverage to further their questionable agendas, it's the very reason why the Sanchez situation has become such a nightmare

The club are spending no more money this window - unless an unknown no hoper, Sanogo style, from the French lower division comes for loose change — and this Scrooge club are simply trying to recoup the Lacazette fee from existing deadwood, reduce the wagebill and con us poor mug fans once again with lies about this or that big player being on the radar, when the truth is — as we cynics know very well, who have learned better from bitter experiience of the clubs constant lies — that no one of note is coming in and this dishonourable, shifty club continue to drag our former great name in the mud, with their corrupt misrunning of our once great and glorious club.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

From youngsters like Neymar and Harry Kane to less expensive veterans like Zlatan, Man United can land the high - quality player they want while getting a lot more value for their transfer fee.

«Against the underlying balance of available funds we have, as mentioned above, invested strongly in player acquisitions during the summer at a total transfer in cost of more than # 90 million with additional significant commitments to player wages, agent's fees and performance related contingencies on top of that.»

If you look at the First Five Years of the last decade Wenger at least managed to qualify for the Champions League in each of those seasons.The Second Five Years have clearly shown we as a Club have gone backwards and spiralling in a downward descent.And in these Five Years we have spent MORE money on transfer fees and player wages than at any time in the Clubs history.

It would take a fee of # 50m - # 60m to persuade Arsenal to sell the former Cardiff City player, according to The Express, but Barcelona are convinced that Ramsey can help lead the club to more glory.

Real Madrid have won the champions league more times than we have even been in a final, Benzema will command a high fee and wages when and if he goes, there is a scramble already to purchase this player, I don't see anyone knocking on our door for OG and that's because despite the fact that he has improved and I like him as a player he is NOT as good a CF as Benzema.

The Chilean's fee would most certainly tell you that almost no player in the world is worth # 40 Million, but Barcelona were looking to sell, while the Celts are more than happy to keep their top goalscorer, and their player is only six months into his four - year contract.

# 15 Million for a player with only one year on his deal poses at a more than reasonable fee, but it does seem a shame to lose him as he is finally showing his ability.

Arsene has been leaning towards signing more experienced players now that the financial restraints of the Stadium build are easing, and if he comes without a transfer fee all the better!

Players seeking 200 / 300k or more a week, winding down contracts, transfers fees over 100m becoming a regular event, it's changed for ever.

Gotze would command a hefty transfer fee, although probably no more than Teixeira, and may be available having failed to establish himself as a key player with the Bundesliga champions.

: ARSENE WENGER has claimed Arsenal can not sign more players because clubs are looking to exploit Premier League teams with inflated transfer fees.

Allardyce has rejected this analysis, however, believing that the fact that replacement Juan Mata was also worth a substantial fee meant that there was no impact on the quality of the United team and that the players should take more of the blame for their East Midlands capitulation:

SEE ALSO: Neymar Man Utd: 7 awesome facts you didn't know about the Barcelona star, including failed Chelsea & West Ham moves Chelsea transfer news round up: Blues agree forward fee, youngster deal close, Real Madrid raid & more Top 50 Chelsea players of the Premier League era: Drogba, Terry & Lampard joined by Arsenal & Liverpool traitors

Wasn't there a time when we buy three players for combine fees of about 30 mill, yet last season we spent about 100 mills and we even got lacazette for 50miill now.come on mate, things are changing, so I beleive more players are comming regardless of sanchez situation.besides we spent 50m so far.

One way or another, the madness of this strange transfer window will cause a big shift in how what and why players move, more and more players will move for free and I suspect the fans attitude will play a big role on what club top players choose to play for and not just transfer fees.

The 39 year old former Swansea City manager has been told he will be handed a modest transfer budget and that more significant moves in the market will have to be funded by the possible sales of players who can recoup a decent fee.

READ MORE: Manchester United set to complete $ 62.7 m transfer, medical in next 48 hours Arsenal get green light to seal signing of # 49m duo, including player who snubbed Liverpool Manchester United set August 11th date to sign winger, $ 30m plus add - ons fee agreed

However, the report in The Sun suggesting that it was the Lyon forward Alexandre Lacazette that Wenger and Gazidis were in France for seems a lot more believable, with the transfer fee for this player said to be more like # 50 million.

We do need a few more players, but players are not always available, especially when you are not willing to overpay transfer fees and on wages.

Because transfer fees being so high, even for normal players, nobody will want to pay the amount of money demanded, more and more players will go to the end of their contracts.

I see no reason why Arsenal can't just give him the three hundred, no transfer fee and he's worth more than twice what we paid for him, he's also worth more than any two other players in this team.

This is a decent article, yet the negatives from fans are still there, I would love to see arsenal like I did at the end of the 90's and at the beggining of the 2nd millennium but it doesn't mean in order to do so I would buy all the best players in world, I would get a rich owner to put his filthy money in, change the manager every 2 years to do so, there's so much wrong in football nowadays that yes it's still a sport but there's more focus on the filthy amounts of money being spent on clubs and players that I think attracts more attention than the game itself, now that is wrong and it's very wrong, even our owner though not like the arabs or Russians, yet the yank is clueless about the tradition of our game, it's just sad, so the fact that Wenger has remained for this long through all these changes that have occurred whilst the money game has elvolved, it makes me happy that arsenal do not spend stupid amounts of money on players, we don't try and buy the league, hell we even tight with wages and transfer fees, I'm glad it's like that, though our season ticket is a rip off I still don't mind it because at least we are not like the other supreme teams, there's a bit of tradition left at our club, yet you go to man shitty or Chelski, there is no tradition, it's all about buying ur way all the way to the top, on the other hand spuds don't know what to make of them besides how the heck have they finished above us?

Ed Woodward is a good example for UTD, he has more than doubled UTDs income and he is now in the pos to spend that income on players for big fees.

Sergio Garcia, who skipped two FedEx Cup series matches earlier this year, has decided to pass up the easy money in the 60 - player, no - cut Dubai tilt for a likely more lucrative appearance fee in Asia.

That West Ham were ranked sixth in agent fees paid last season and have several players (with limited re-sale value) earning more than anyone at Tottenham just doesn't seem to make any long term sense.