Retained the ball well in comparison with his teammates (Fulham's
players put us to shame a bit in terms of this).
Not exact matches
It is because he has hada season of Lampardesque proportions in the Bundesliga, and his stats
put all of Arsenal
players to shame, including our assist king Mesut Ozil.
Spot of Galen — I think Alexis commitment and never - say - die attitude
shamed a number of
players into having
to put in a proper shift + since our defeat at Southampton Le Coq has been a defensive inspiration.
The Blues have picked up just one point from their opening two Premier League fixtures, and Jose Mourinho has been unhappy with the displays
put in by his Chelsea charges, even electing
to name and
shame seven
players who he feels are below - par (via Sky Sports).
He
puts allot of
players to shame, we're often talking about too many games and
players being left out so we can use them in a big match.
why was Sanchez truly playing... no one believes he was too injured
to play
to start the season, and some like myself would go as far
to suggest he wasn't injured at all... so why play him... they can't say it was
to appease the fans because when was that ever a factor at this club except when «panic buys» were in the offing... I believe that this was
to give Arsenal a little leverage when it comes
to negotiating his transfer... just imagine their horrible bargaining position if Sanchez never saw the field before the deadline then heading back
to South America and played for Chile... regardless of the facts, this was sadly again another example of a team
putting business ahead of fielding a team with the greatest chance
to secure 3 points... of course, some will say that Sanchez is, or was, our best
player, so obviously he's a no - brainer
to start, but those who really watch the game know that his heart hasn't been truly in it for quite some time... even at the end of last season you could see a definitive difference between the Sanchez who played for Chile and the one that played for Arsenal... that being said, 70 % of Sanchez is still better than a 100 % of the vast majority of our remaining roster...
shame on you Arsene and
shame on you too Sanchez for that telling smirk... I've supported your attempt
to push this squad
to the next level but don't pretend for a second that you didn't know you were being watched... don't lower your standards or you'll end up like this club, on the outside looking in
Do you guys know that in ghe two games Maitland - Niles started as a CM for Arsenal he looked far far better than Xhaka.It's a
shame pdople won't see it and will calk me deluded but Maitland Niles will be do good if he started weeXhaka's a
player who'll only look good when we're dominating.It's a
shame Maitland - Niles and Wilshere have
to put up with this.People will» Maitland Niles is 18 and wasn't signed for # 35» while for Wilshere they'll say» He just came back from injury and Xhaka has more steel».
It takes in loud rock music, fireworks, all sorts of lighting effects (heavy on the lasers), introductions that would
put even Merv Griffin
to shame and carefully orchestrated interaction between the
players and the fans.
If let
players bully u then so will the ref u have
to start small with kicking off and lashing out get a few reds then they know not
to mess then u name and
shame refs in the media and
put pressure on them etc soon enough u have the respect u deserve but if u don't even appeal for ur own penalty shouts and never complain or lash out now and then we'll the refs in England will think u don't care and won't give u nothing just like stoke game even zidane who was the best
player head butted some one for not respecting him u earn respect
com where he was discriminating Chelsea's style of play... I wonder when this old nag wud mind his team's business, we've not won sh ** for many years and he's more concerned about a title wining team's style of play... this man lacks
shame... Is this what we are gonna face next season, how did we manage
to put up with this fool for so long... he never talks about how his
players are all average flops, but he's more concerned about how much manure and Chelsea bought pogba n others....
Without playing brilliantly, Arsenal still didn't lose, but it's a
shame that it is now two weeks before the next game as I suspect there are a few regrets for the
players that they want
to put right sooner rather than later.
What a terrifying vision of the future of football we've been served up this week.AC Milan, once the pride of a powerful and thriving seria A now reduced
to shadow boxing against a really not that great United.All because they deserted their natural (and rather beautiful) defensive style of football
to join the circus, brought in foreign
players (especially brazilians) who think jogging back
to defend is beneath them and generally
put two fingers up
to Italy's historic football traditions.Much good as it done them, and what a boring game?I concede that a lot of football fans nowadays do nt remember anything before the cheque book league but even they must have been struck by the sheer mind numbing pointlessness of it.Even the stewards were asleep by half time.As for the porto match well all that can be said is that they made the gooners look like an half decent well balanced football team, no mean achievement when you think about it.At least we, ve had the pleasure of listening
to all those gooners and Mancs waffling on about how great they are which is always hilarious.Especially the stuff about Rooney, just wait till the World Cup when some Italian or South American defender takes him under his wing for half an hour and then see how great he is.If he can survive the WC without being sent off it will be a miracle.All the recent hype has done him no favours at all.Not that the World Cup really inspires these days, its glory days are long over and it's become a competition decided by referees rather than great play.Bear that in mind if Roons has
to take the walk of
shame, it's not his fault, someone told him he was a truly great
player like Bobby Charlton or George Best.The problem is he looks like he believes them.
A few setbacks that will be fixed is a bad thing, not saying it isn't or that it's not worth demerits / penalties - but it's obvious that server problems at launch - as bad as they are
to the consumers,
to get such a hefty pounding over it where a reviewer is all like «I take my review back, I'm lowering my score until the servers get better - Oh hey, 6 months later the servers are better, here, have a 7.5 again» That does not sound professional no matter how you want
to put it (Not like anyone goes
to Polygon for anything professional anyways): / Short - comings or downfalls that are temporary should be given
Shame I'd say, a definite negative feedback in some variety which comes all but naturally with the
players whether a reviewer points it out or not, customer reviewers do that and I think should be used for these kind of problems.
They certainly
put to shame anything that can be made by
players.
Probably one of the best titles in the long - forgotten 2D racer genre, it
puts the
player in control of a sentient unicycle of all things, and gives him a list of tricks and stunts that would
put Tony Hawk
to shame, creating an experience that is not found anywhere in gaming.
The creativity with direct
player interaction frankly
puts other games
to shame.
Game Freak totally overhauled the visuals and made more changes
to the familiar formula than ever before, yet still managed
to cater
to players of all skill levels with an unbelievable amount of content that threatens
to put Animal Crossing
to shame.
Items can be well hidden without feeling cheap, power - ups like the ice flower can completely change how a level feels and plays, and the scenery available
to the
player puts 2D games
to shame.
Titanfall 2's slick campaign
put it
to shame, while Battlefield 1's 64 -
player battles in open terrain made the familiar Call of Duty formula feel stale.
These three in particular provide a balance and maturity in public discussion that
puts many
players in the global warming movement
to shame, and as a consequence their out - reach
to the scientifically - inclined general public is highly effective.