Sentences with phrase «playing against weaker»

It does appear that Fergie is trying to keep Owen sweet be playing him against the weaker opponents from the off and he does look a likely started against Rovers.

We do nt need to play with a DM every game, at home playing against weaker opposition I can see us using a midfield of Ramsey - Wilshire and Ozil but against tougher opposition we can bring Carvalho in instead of Wilshire and drop him a bit deeper.

Ozil is great playing against weaker teams, I do nt remember him in games against top teams though Auba, Ozil, Laca, Mikhi, Ramsey, Bellerin, are good for next year, all the rest need better alternatives.

Obviously you are playing against weaker opponents, but you are playing with weaker teammates.

A claim was made that it should be obvious that the reason any player would play better in a bench role is because they'd be playing against weaker opponents.

The question is, «is his better play against weaker competition good enough?»

He's an impact player or a player we can play against weak sides like Gallatasaray we can't afford to carry players.

Davenports film is mediocre and he played against weak opponents.

The worst would be Arteta who is still good enough to play against the weaker teams to give Coquelin a rest.

Not exact matches

According to Black, two women played crucial roles in the «war against the weak.»

Remember chelsea are playing at home to a much weaker team while we have to travel and we have another away game against tottenham on the horizon which is a must win for obvious reasons.

Wengers method of bluffing the board & fans to keep him for a further season... > We loose enough games to take us completely off winning the league, then say it wasn't in our control, we then fight till the end and win last few games so we look good and like we worked hard to earn the 4th place trophy.He then links us with awesome transfers (which we all know wont happen), and finally while Man U / City and Chelsea organise pre-season friendlies against top clubs, we play the weak ones, win and look all good to go next season without any additions... AND THEN REALITY STRIKES..

This team has no leaders are weak and easy to play against and we have a deluded manager so we are in for 2 more years of misery!!

Play with 2 strikers against weaker teams and be direct instead of passing and passing with no end product.

Weak goal to give up, but the plays we witnessed against Palace with Ramsey / Cazorla / Ozil / Giroud / Sanchez?

As much i have faith in the WOS trio against teams playing footbal as much as i don't trust them againt teams parking the bus because they are weak physically But hey why not barcelona lack phisical players but scores loades of goals against teams parking the bus

chelsea are playing at home to a much weaker team while we have to travel and we have another away game against tottenham on the horizon which is a must win for obvious reasons.

All three of our away games in Europe are to be played on Tuesday, leaving plenty of time for the team to recover before the next league match and although one of those matches is the north London derby it is at the Emirates stadium and is going to be played on the Sunday, so the European game should not affect our chances, especially as it is against Lodogorets, the weakest team in the group.

Ozil should only play at home against weaker teams.

We also know how the FA cup draws have been very kind to Arsenal (e.g. playing a weak Man Utd in transition under Van Gaal, sending offs going in our favour, and drawn against countless non league or weaker teams compared to our EPL rivals etc)

If arsene decided to line up with the weak team that play against zagareb tottenham must win the game, debuchy shld be out of our squad, kieran shld be giving a new role after atleast 70 mins or so, i thnk from the team that played chelski cech shld be left out to give him some resting moment bt if we dare repeated zagreb's mistake definitely spuds wl win the game.SALIS DALHAT KWANKWASO UP UP UP GUNNERS.

But in any case we need a new winger if want to play with four defenders again against the weaker teams.

Whilst we like to beat up on OG his goals / game ratio in PL over the last 3 years is pretty similar to Benzeman — who plays in a team that creates far more chances against arguably weaker opposition week in week out.

Arsenal have to secure the attack and get Alexis ready for the match against Barca and the remaining fixtures against top premier league sides.The team has to win against Barca and then beat them at Nou - Camp causes it really is irritating to see Wenger playing bad players in the big matches in the past, Arsenal have allowed themselves to be weak where Wenger is after the league means these Southhampton, Stoke, Chelsea get the luck against this side.

Wolcott playing in the box not playing from out wide that will work only against weaker team

i've been saying that we do nt need Mert in most of our games, he is the weakest link and if you play against a top team, you will be stupid not to say they will map him out to attack.

«The Premier League is not always about football qualities, it is about physically, second balls, and in that aspect the team is too weak at the moment and we have many difficulties against teams like this who play really direct and are aggressive.

He's played that sort of role for England, albeit against weak opposition.

The line up will have a pretty comical defence but you still expect us to do well considering it's a weaker team at home we're playing against.

I'm happy enough with Arteta, Flamini backup for Coq seeing as Jack and Ramsey can also play there against the weaker teams..

I wonder why the guy kept Campbell if he will not play him, why play Ozil or Cazorla on the left wing when you have Podolsky.The team did well as they always do against weak team but the tactic remain the same, look how Arsenal were better at the end without the usual suspects forced on the team Wilshr, Arteta etc..

The way we got beaten yesterday was embarrassing, it wasn't even nearly good enough, wenger will prob say «it was just a friendly and doesn't really matter» and «it was a chance to try something different with some youth players» and to an extent he is right but none of the players in an Arsenal shirt were good enough and we looked very weak and if we play anything close to that in the prem, even against a bottom half team we will probably lose.

exactly my point, we arsenal fans are so retarded that we think having lacazette on the bench is bad, but if it's manchester city everyone will say it's quality in squad depth, we always criticise mourinho for playing defensive football but want simeone to come and be our coach, someone who can not attack against a team as weak as leganes or alaves.

Fabregas was good but we were weak also because of him, CMs should be difficult to play against and I don't think he was.

Liverpool and Spurs overall strength is slightly weaker, but there is a difference in the way they play and base on the way the matches this season has unfold Arsenal and Chelsea seems to be less dominant against quality opposition.

For them to become the future of Arsenal and England they need to be playing more than they are, we could play them together against the weaker teams at home in the Prem so they can build a better understanding and bond that good CBS have but at the moment even the so called weaker teams are a challenge for us.

For Arsenal to pay # 42.5 million and # 35 million on transfer of players and then go and play defensive counter attacting style football with little possession against even weak opposition.

??? = New signing or instead of a def B2B we could play Ozil or Mkhi here against weaker oppositions that we are expected to dominate possession against.

We'll be in pot 2 this year so we'll be playing against at least one major team in the group stages hopefully, though there are one or two weaker sides like Benfica in pot 1.

Couple that with Wenger's own under - management of players and tactical laziness / disrespect to opposition, and you have yesterday at Anfield, the 6 - 0 at Chelsea, the 5 - 1 at Anfield a few years ago, the 6 - 3 at Man City, the destruction TWICE by Bayern (who claimed we were easy to play against), the weak - willed defeats against anyone well organised like Watford or West Brom, etc..

If he goes missing in big games it is because our back 6 are so weak against the big sides that they can't control possession and play out from the back.

A W against a weak Bucs team is a must and they will play as such.

That is all very well, but were those two clean sheets more due to the fact that we were playing very weak teams that mostly just wanted to defend against us?

Should only be played RB when we are desperate or against weaker teams.

Wilshere looked good... needs more game time but could be an ideal foil for Xhaka against weaker teams and let Ramsey play the no 10 role.

I know that it is preseason but this team is very weak we are weak in the Midfield area and the wing if a team put pressure on us we have nowhere to go lack of skill technical ability passing Vision in the Midfield what it we were playing against Tottenham Hotspur do you think Sanchez would make the defence bellerin or mustafi we still need at least three player

I guess you could play Elneny on his own in the center against weaker opponents but that is a risk and would only work well if the whole teams presses and wins the ball nback in 10 seconds or less not uncle City or Barca.

Which means these three play well in less than 12.5 % of the teams games and half of those games were against weak opposition.

The only thing is, that they are in the CL, but they didn't even get further than us last year, playing much weaker opposition, against Monaco!

Maybe its early days but when we playing against teams that love to counter we will be exposed as we do alot of turnovers.bellerin luked weak today, both offensive and defensive.our quality for final pass isnt there.