Sentences with phrase «playing through once»

That isn't to say it's a bad game: I still had a good time playing through it once I adjusted to the laggy controls and messy art and level design.

While it definitely isn't the worst game that I have ever played, and I had a decent amount of fun playing through it once, I can't say that it would be missed too much if it were to be [REDACTED].

I would go so far as to say playing through once in single player is a worthwhile time all by itself.

I got to level 2 after playing through once and then level 3 unlocked after my second play through of the second missions.

Although this latest release is not the definitive version, it's still worth playing through once or twice if you're a fan of the genre and don't already own a previous port.

Typoman is an intriguing puzzle platformer that's worth playing through once for fans of the genre.

Don't let the small number of levels put you off: Splash or Crash is not a game to be played through once and put aside.

Each map adds a couple new things but after you play it through once it loses all fun and enjoyment.

Alot of fun, but very short if you're only going to play through the once.

An excerpt of sounds and score plays through once over a static shot of the prison for the Blu - ray and DVD's main menu.

If you play something like RE and you play through it once then you know the cues and it loses its scare factor.

I highly suggest, once you've played through it once, to make a very stupid character.

I'll probably still rent it when it release to play through it once, but I'm not sure I'll want to get all 100 % like I did in the past games.

I didn't learn too many speedruns in the first half of 2016, only picking up LISA and Not a Hero, but Furi was a game that I played through once, then beat it again the next day, and again the day after.

Set to be released on Switch, PS4, Xbox One and Steam this summer, for $ 15 this game is a must grab even if you only play through it once.

Braid was beautiful to play through the once.

I would imagine to most nerds like me who's interest was piqued by the DC subject matter, it seems forever destined to be played through once, before being put to the back of the cupboard till you pile in from a nightclub at 2 am and lack the faculties to play Call of Duty.

I can't imagine someone buying this and feeling like they wasted their money — even if you play through it once on the easiest difficulty, it's still more game for a single dollar than you're going to get anywhere else, and frankly it puts to shame most of the five, ten, or even fifteen dollar releases out there.

If you're into achievement hunting or speedrunning, Black Hole might provide some amount of replayability, but for everyone else keep in mind this is a game you'll probably only want to play through once.

Unfortunately most of the levels will require you to play through them once, then replay on Free Play mode to find and collect the pink brick.

Even if you only play through once and disregard the online features, it's still worth it.

but only enough to play through once.

There's just a whole lot of things in the game that anyone who's played through it once would've probably missed unless you knew about it beforehand.

Whatever it is, Little Inferno is something you'll only play through once but should definitely play regardless.

Not exact matches

Once a sector has been cracked open, operational restrictions come in to play — witness the ongoing regulation of the film market through censorship, import quotas and central government decisions on movie release dates.

According to Lewis, modern man lives in a tiny windowless universe, his boundaries narrowed to too small a focus.75 Through such play experiences as the reading of stories - when one could experience life «in a sense «for fun,» and with [his] feet on the fender» - Lewis believed that modern man could perhaps recapture a sense of his distant horizons, much as he once had.76 For Lewis, a story was the embodiment of, or mediation of, the «more.»

Yes, I am a male worship leader and writer and not once in all the times that I have ever played or heard this incredible song, have I viewed it through the eyes of pervert.

Byrnes complains that, once I had moved us from the playing field of heterosexual vs. homosexual to that of marital vs. nonmarital (where being marital includes being procreative in kind), I did not play the game through to the end and give a larger argument attacking nonmarital sex.

It is currently playing out in the live animal export sector, where the demise of local processing opened the door for a live export sector, which in turn through its simple business model has compromised livestock welfare and alienated many consumers, reduced employment in Top End towns which once had abattoirs, and added risk to cattle business profitability by providing only one market outlet.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

Teams lose big names all the time as the bumps and bruises add up, or maybe those stars try to play through the injuries that we only hear about once they're eliminated, like Joe Thornton playing four games with a torn ACL.

«With the amount of ice time I get, the guys I play with, the expectation would be that you'd score a goal once in a while,» said Wheeler, who has 16 goals and 48 assists through 58 games.

thats what rvp said on here once, it isnt that the system has changed, wengers system is superb he just needed the right players to play it and now through mustafi we have the quality, even if we had just bought a good defender we could have been as good as right now..

So once again Alexis Sanchez will play through the middle with Iwobi and Walcott on the flanks and Ozil in the number 10 role.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The deal will now officially go through when Atletico's transfer ban ends in January, and he'll have Europa League football to look forward to once he is eligible to play...

i think that we arsenal fans have become puppets that every f *** ing agent who needs recognition or a few more followers on twitter can play with but who can blame us... we crave for signings because we know what we want and am 95 % sure that if the club could just listen to the voice of the fans and sign they players the crave for for once, we can even win the CL... GOD BLESS EVERY GOONER OUT THERE CZ THROUGH OUT THE ROUGH PERIODS, IT WAS THE FANS, IT HAS BEEN THE FANS AND WILL ALWAYS BE THEM....

I'm not so sure, especially considering that Giroud has already missed ten weeks through injury, and Podolski didn't play once!

I think the fact that he's managed to make positive and game effecting plays through this terrible game planning is a testament to how good he can be once he gets weapons and a coach who's more invested in harnessing his greatness than saving his own legacy.

However, once play was resumed Manu raced through the Roma defence to put the hosts level on the night with a well taken strike.

But easy to say negative things when your an addict of negative making negative statements we did nt win everything every year tottenham has been behind us till this year for 2o years mu went through 3 managers then got mourinho and he said hi i see you have billlions of dollars to spend why do nt you buy a team ill smile for three years make some dumb comments win a title chelsea not yet mu cause you spent more money than anyone else has except those city folks recently and play fall asleep football i mean wenger is great and haters gonna hate cause thats all they know to do they'll hate till we win the title then be happy for a day once its confirmed then say well we did nt win champions leauge or vice versa cause they re a negative addict they nead their dose to disassemble true success

If you do nt have the fast wingers crossing balls in the second option for Giroud is fast balls into him with players either side of him that he can play through an Target man Amc of sorts however once again we do not play this system.

Kelvin Benjamin (knee, questionable) has been playing through a torn meniscus in recent weeks and is once again expected to gut it out Sunday.

Only once the LWF secured a big school bus, so that players never had to walk an hour through withering heat to play away games, did the KPL take off.

Telling me players are not to blame is absolutely rubbish, they are to blame, yes Monaco mission was to relax and repell Arsenal and if possible shut them down completely, this gam was ours to take, First the pressure was on Monaco, they didn't know how to go about it, whether to defend their 3 - 1 advantage or press us, we had more than enough clear cut chances but as usual we were clueless in front of goal, we tried to open them apart which is impossible, Carzolla and Alexis played as if we lead 15 - 0, holding balls, try to dribble every time they have the ball and and reduce the pace and any chance of other to get through, losing balls carelessly, poor crosses is now our style, it doesn't threatened even Charlton athletic coz everyone now knows our crosses is poorly delivered and our attackers also don't have a clue how to do it even if one get through it will be wasted, this game should have been won by range attempts which was only tried once by ÖZIL and was blocked.

Coaches ran participants through college and NBA drills to determine skill levels and once evaluated, split participants into teams to play 10 minute games.

With Michu's main strength being running onto a through pass played by one of Swansea's more gifted ball players such as Britton or de Guzman there may be no better opponent to play against than Arsenal with their main problem in defence as seen at White Hart Lane last week is keeping a stable and aware defensive line once they have pushed up further out of their own half.

Once again Swansea stood off Rooney, who played in the Swedish star to bruise through a weak tackle from Angel Rangel and poke home from 15 yards.

In what could be his final performance for the Gunners at the Emirates stadium, Alexis Sanchez once again played through injury and had an important hand in Arsenal's 3 - 1 victory over Everton just as he has had an important hand in most of their victories throughout the season.

Defenders are in fact becoming more like their colleagues further forward in their abilities to start moves out from the back and push - on, high up the field, not just breaking through the different lines in possession, from defence into midfield and even attack, but almost playing multiple positions at once.