Sentences with phrase «playing weaker opposition»

No but equally he was playing weaker opposition for 3 years and last year for the champions and most successful club in that country.

Not exact matches

Iwobi recked my head last night he was weak and misplaced many passes he cant seem to control the ball its always running away from him he should not be in the middle in the middle you need good ball controllers with good eyes for passes long and short on the ground and above the ground >> > waterford yesterday were on top of us with no space giving to our players and we were scattered all over the place with no vision or leader ship too goals in the space of 3 minuets ok the first goal was a fluke but come on the second one???? and thats all what it takes to loose a match many times this season we cant play when the opposition seats in our face we have no cohesion or understanding we crumble away we need to start the game together as a unit a compact unit

From three the invincible to a mid table weak and error strewn team who opposition teams look for Ward to playing.

Whilst we like to beat up on OG his goals / game ratio in PL over the last 3 years is pretty similar to Benzeman — who plays in a team that creates far more chances against arguably weaker opposition week in week out.

I'm tired of baby faced / cute looking players mentally weak players who get bulied by players who know we have a soft underbelly... he might flop, yes, but if he comes good???... if dis deal happens, I'll b ecstatic cuz Sanchez will have another «lost cause chaser» like him and ozil will have a genuine goal threat, not that French model who mostly plays like d oppositions extra defender... Mr Wenger, get me koulibaly from Napoli also then I'll gladly join ur bandwagon this season

He's played that sort of role for England, albeit against weak opposition.

Liverpool and Spurs overall strength is slightly weaker, but there is a difference in the way they play and base on the way the matches this season has unfold Arsenal and Chelsea seems to be less dominant against quality opposition.

For Arsenal to pay # 42.5 million and # 35 million on transfer of players and then go and play defensive counter attacting style football with little possession against even weak opposition.

??? = New signing or instead of a def B2B we could play Ozil or Mkhi here against weaker oppositions that we are expected to dominate possession against.

We do nt need to play with a DM every game, at home playing against weaker opposition I can see us using a midfield of Ramsey - Wilshire and Ozil but against tougher opposition we can bring Carvalho in instead of Wilshire and drop him a bit deeper.

Couple that with Wenger's own under - management of players and tactical laziness / disrespect to opposition, and you have yesterday at Anfield, the 6 - 0 at Chelsea, the 5 - 1 at Anfield a few years ago, the 6 - 3 at Man City, the destruction TWICE by Bayern (who claimed we were easy to play against), the weak - willed defeats against anyone well organised like Watford or West Brom, etc..

Which means these three play well in less than 12.5 % of the teams games and half of those games were against weak opposition.

The only thing is, that they are in the CL, but they didn't even get further than us last year, playing much weaker opposition, against Monaco!

Instead he placed our right winger up front where he proved again he is not cut out to play as a striker except against the weakest of opposition.

It was a common tactic that even weaker opposition used to deploy against us, to apply a hard midfield press as we'd always try to play through it.

I wanted Ozil gone weeks ago, but I'd play him still if we're at home against weak opposition.

Song, arguably our most improved player is on 4 yellow cards and we should ensure that he doesn't miss the Chelsea game.The partnership of Gallas and Vermaelen is outstanding, yet one can not expect them to play in every game, and it is in that are we are weak in cover.With regards to the full back situation, perm any two from four, that is Clichy, Gibbs, Eboue, Sagna and even Traore they are attacking wing backs and are always at risk on the quick counter attack by the opposition.Almunia still doesn't impress me and his command of his area is still indecisive and he is still vulnerable to letting goals in, especially to his near post.Wenger being Wenger, I doubt he will buy in January, and it is a pity we didn't go for Given months before he joined City, when he was available for a comparatively cheap price.This new diamond shape or 4 -1-4-1 is working well and we have an abundance of quality to interchange, which bemuses the opposition more often than not.We have every chance this year, and we are also being helped by the fact that the other so called big four sides are showing their vulnerability.A couple of decent signings, not squad players in January, and hopefully we are in the mix.

Nothing is predictable as an Arsenal fan and for those that put some cash on the games, it's prudent to click here for live betting so you can first evaluate which Arsenal team has turned up to play; the team that is capable of both thrashing weaker sides and grinding out a win when necessary or the team that capitulates so easily once the opposition start to show some fight.

The major Caucasian characters in the film are almost all forces of opposition: Tim Roth plays bigoted governor George Wallace as a weak man raging pitifully against progress, while Dylan Baker brings a perfect squareness to J. Edgar Hoover, assigned by Johnson to spy on and possibly discredit King.