Sentences with phrase «plays a position where»

Plus he spent much of his time in the minors as a catcher and is playing a position where many players don't seem to age well.

«And individuals like myself playing positions where we're supposed to be violent, we're supposed to get our point across through being loud and forceful.

«Podolski plays a position where there is a big competition.

Not exact matches

The fact of the matter is that salary comparisons will always be apples - to - oranges due to the many variables at play — so we as business leaders must define roles, devise compensation ranges for those roles, and then decide where the company will position itself within those ranges based on the variables.

As CEO of Taymor Industries, where the principal ownership of the company by the Zalkow family dates back to 1948, she has played a pivotal role in positioning the company as a leader in the decorative hardware industry in North America.

Of particular note was David's involvement on a prior investment where he played a critical role in helping the company exponentially increase revenue, double the customer list, strengthen the management team, and position the business for sale to a publicly traded strategic acquirer.

Playing as confidently as ever to the strength of its balance sheet, Deutsche Bank retained its number - one position in Western Europe's bond market, where it raised $ 126.3 billion in 534 bond deals for a 7.2 % market share last year.

«For players to be in a position where you're in a slam and boycotting playing on the court, I think would potentially cause a lot of issues.

Listen I keep seeing bumper stickers like «you can't be both Catholic and pro-choice» these are not reflective of my faith, theser are slogans made for propaganda, I have 2 beautiful children and I have never been on a position where abortion could even play a part, but it is a legal option to the public at large; this being said even the bible calls for us to be good citizens, and to obey the law, I believe that this is a matter that belongs with the family and not the state; no matter how we criminalize abortion, they will not stop, but people will go under - ground and more fatalities will occur, I rather see the government placing incentives on more conseling for these expectant mothers and more outreach done at church levels, to reduce the debate to a single slogan is dangerous and will not accomplish the ultimately goal of preventing abortions my two humble cents

This is where the misconceptions of the Free Grace position come into play.

Support a manager who consistently makes poor tactical decisions such as playing players out of position and failing EVERY year to strengthen where we need it.

You just don't see where the Wilshere criticism is coming from, Jack was a bit part player last season and their Prince was played in his so called prefered position but did fxck all in it for the whole season.

To all those saying Bellerin should have been sold to Barca, what if Ox where to get injured, not that i want him to, but then who would play that position?

Except, what about crappy pop - up slides, where the goal of the runner is to put himself in a better position to advance on the play if needed, but a lack of body control makes him sproing up into the air?

He created a team with a system of play where each player was drilled in their correct and natural position.

Players played outside of their natural positions even when there's enough players to play a squad where all the boxes tick.

«We are in a position where we know what is requested, so everybody in the squad will have to play a part in that and it's a good opportunity for us to show that we can produce the performances needed and that we can maintain the focus on every single game.»

He wouldn't be doing his job properly if he lets players dictate where they want to go, or what position they want to play in.

If we play a match where we are playing lazy and not into the match, if Wenger misplaces players in positions we could have another big loss.

No matter what team we fielded today, I think Chelsea would have had the upper hand regardless because as many have said, they have a player that specializes in each preferred position, where as Arsenal have many players that can play all over the pitch, but don't really have much impact.

Well I think that the return of Danny Welbeck might be one way, especially after the manager played him in the left forward position where Sanchez operates.

If he was playing in a position where he didn't need to run the play and Ramsey ran the play we would get back to winning ways.

Where I hope Wenger won't be «Wenger» will be to start playing him at Wing back, HE IS A DAMN GOOD ATTACKING MIDFIELDER AND HE IS NOT VERSATILE (in Yesterdays» game he scored 2 great goes the moment he moved to the AM position from the WB position — that tells you where home is for this talented young man) He will fit well across the front 3, end of sWhere I hope Wenger won't be «Wenger» will be to start playing him at Wing back, HE IS A DAMN GOOD ATTACKING MIDFIELDER AND HE IS NOT VERSATILE (in Yesterdays» game he scored 2 great goes the moment he moved to the AM position from the WB position — that tells you where home is for this talented young man) He will fit well across the front 3, end of swhere home is for this talented young man) He will fit well across the front 3, end of story.

«I think at the start of the season, the fact that I used him in defensive positions maybe made him realise that there's no opening where he dreams to play but there could be an opening where he doesn't dream to play.

In order to win the EPL Arsenal need all the players playing at the position where they can excel.

He does nt believe in the CDM position, he never changes tactics and when he did this season its been this stupid 4141 where everyone plays out of position, he thinks were fine on strikers....

I truly don't know where you stand on the debate over the knee thing but if you're going to put down info, don't be comparing apples to oranges like you did and don't be saying that there are only 5 teams he's qualified to play for when it's more like 19 assuming that you're even remotely accurate that he couldn't be playing one of the safety positions in a 3 - 4.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

If you are [able to play] in different positions it gives you more of a chance to play and having the knowledge where you want the ball in different positions.

The only stories we've heard about are from clubs who will be fighting out mid table and relegation positions, which quite frankly is where he should be playing

Where will ramsey play at no 10 position or Ox at no 10??

The point is that Wenger is sabotaging the team years after years for selling and not replacing where we need.Those last years he has added that to playing players out of position, reducing the substitutions, playing a core of favourite and refusing to adapt tactic to the opposition.

we cant accommodate him at wrong positions at the expense of pleasing him while giving away points... its clear that we have faired so well in games where Wilshire and Ramsey have been out injured.sorry but it's true.when fit they are played at wrong positions while inform players are benched

Having said that we are now in a position where there is no room for leeway, and Watford will surely know this and try to play on the fact that Arsenal are under huge pressure to win the final game before the first international break.

So the second would probably need to be a central midfielder (or another wing back if Ox stays and is used as a utility player where he plays across the wing back positions both sides or central midfield if needed)

Ramsey — overpaid, overused, injury prone, not clinical enough as a passer or finisher and he's played out of position way too much to the detriment of our supposed offensive and defensive schemes... obviously I think he has some skills and I'm pleased he didn't let his horrible injury years ago end his career but he holds on to the ball too much, gives away the ball too often and too cheaply, doesn't play good enough defensively considering the previous concern and often finds himself to far up the pitch way too often for a guy who doesn't score or assist near enough... better suited for Wales where the team is set up to accommodate his and Bales skills

Chambers — had a great season you look at the amount of football Bellerin has played recently and chambers has hardly featured but Chambers has still played a lot more minutes of football than bellerin this season not a natural right back but did a great job earlier in the season and a more central position looks to be where he'll play in the future but he was never going to be first choice straight away.

We aren't in a position where we can regularly play a player who is «settling down».

this do nt rule out a new defender... and for the dm issue we have chambers, he has played very well and his best position is dm, in defence we have debuchy and bellerin and the pair koscielny and mertesacker on the middle, where will chambers have game time if not as a dm?

He was second fiddle to Zlatan Ibra at PSG, and was forced into playing in a foreign position on the RW all season where previously at Napoli and earlier he was bred and groomed as a central striker.

«[If] the president of the United States phones you up and wants to play golf with you, I wasn't going to say no... I'm sorry if I pissed people off but I felt I was in a position where I couldn't really do anything but say yes.

He wanted to go for the win, figuring that with so few laps left their best chance stood if they stayed out, thereby placing Newman in a position where he would need to play defense.

A very, very positive sign that I personally feel is more indicative of where our defence is at considering it was actually with our preferred options playing in key positions.

He runs the film through from opening kickoff to final gun, studying the positioning of his officials, where they were on crucial plays, how they called the plays and whether they were correct or not.

On a positive note Sanchez and Ozil where looking good playing together just a sharp threat they where interchanging position and getting sneaky balls through..

I assure you that, though Ozil can get back to playing in his favored position — behind the striker — his «disinterest», irrespective of where he plays, will not bode well for himself or Arsenal.

Where are all those fu ckers yelling about Ozil played out of position?

We're NOT linked now with anyone else and that's a worrying thing in itself, I personally really don't think Walcott is good enough to play that striker role and I know I'll get roundly «thumbed down» for this but its how I feel about the boy he's good but NOT as good as he thinks he is and it annoys me that theres a possibility that all the toing and froing around his contract may be stopping us from signing a top notch striker (and I DO NT think Martinez is this) I do feel that AW will opt for the cheap and second rate options again and this will also include not buying a striker and putting Walcott in this role, meanwhile all our rivals will be putting strong established players into the positions where they need to bull up their squads we are not well known for doing this and its not going to happen now, which is infuriating as this is the right time to break that mould and go for it!!

The assists from open play he gives are almost all from cutbacks (not a bad thing) but he rarely goes into a position with the ball where he can give a cut back.

I believe a new manager could really do him well, so keep him, as he is also playing a position, where we would have to buy a replacement, if he is sold.