Not exact matches
There were important developments left out, segments glossed over, timelines shifted,
plot points were outright
changed.
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has
changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this
point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the
plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
While the novel of «Fifty Shades Freed» offered a more satisfying and complete arc that showcases how married life has
changed the protagonists, for both better and worse, the movie adaptation cut some of the most important
plot points, in an effort to create a shorter and more cohesive plotline.
The manner in which Coogler swiftly reveals game -
changing plot points generates surprise without coming off as manipulative.
The movie starts like the trailer, showing how kick - ass decides to be a superhero, but as soon as he meets hit girl and Big Daddy, who were already super heroes before him, the whole
point of the movie entirely
changes to satisfy the revenge
plot between Big Daddy and the main bad guy.
Plot points are constantly contradicted, characters inexplicably
change with no discernable arc, and the tone is all over the place.
Throughout the story, we're often only told of seemingly vital
plot points through second hand accounts, characters tend to
change their outlooks without reason merely to fit in the story's trajectory and our main antagonist is a cookie - cutter villain who simply confronts Hope with little reason other than he's on set to be a contemptible dude.
(That latter
point also shows how the recurring sight of billboards for the Broadway musical Rent — whose tagline, «no day but today,» is not only fairly synonymous with this film's title, but whose
plot also centers around life -
changing interpersonal bonds forged in the isolating environment of NYC — to be another sly, savvy detail.)
The Terminator franchise has always existed somewhere in the mushy middle between unified stories told across multiple films (The Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter) and serial stories free to
change actors, back stories, and
plot points (James Bond, any superhero franchise).
His transformation is partly physical: in a poorly explained
plot point, he begins turning from a slimy human to slimy alien, very slowly despite warnings of how very quickly he's
changing.
One of the central
plot points in «Bingo: The King of the Mornings» sees our protagonist pleading to
change the script for the American TV franchise in which he stars.
One of the central
plot points in «Bingo: The King of the Mornings» sees our protagonist pleading to
change the script for the American...
That shows the line between «can» and «can't yet» and it literally
plots the next step for each student so we found it incredibly useful and it was used by teachers because all they had to do was follow the student along their line, when the colour
changed from green to white, they could check on that
point, refer back to the NAPLAN writing guide and work out «what is the next focus for that student?»
An eBook that allows an author to
change section, to move up
plot points depending on reader input, to
change the entire setting based on a reader's location — that is a wholly different genre than that of regular books, and is obviously where we're heading (some of the more adventurous of us).
I didn't
change the main
plot events or any turning
points.
That
plot point is where the story
changes to put the protagonist in a bind and is often a «gotcha.»
Do you ever do more than correcting typos (e.g.,
change wording, even
change a minor
plot point)?
It's hard to learn the necessary skills while working on a novel you care about, since you might not be willing to
change an element you love to fit a conceptual
plot point.
On another note, I read many years back that good
plotting dictates that you begin your story at the
point closest to the incident that will forever
change the life of the protagonist.
One of my favorite authors is updating one of my favorite kids / YA series of books so that they are a little more modern, she starting writing these books 30 years ago and things have
changed since the time of the Apple II (we now have internet, smartphones, WiFi and text messaging) while at the same time clarifying some
plot points and even adding a few scenes and
plot enhancements, these are only available as ebooks at this
point.
I will avoid spoilers, but the last section not only ruins the entire
plot, it drastically
changes the whole tone of the game up to that
point.
Record of Agarest War Zero is shorter than the original, but if you connect this game to the first one's save file, or beat the game once, you get access to a digest mode of Record of Agarest War, where you can replay the major
plot points of the game plus «Extra mode» which ups the battle difficulty without
changing the story.
One of the key threads of Fragments is the way that vision
changes depending on your vantage
point, and there are dramatic shifts in both perspective and scale throughout; from digital explorations via endless scroll to earth — as - camera, as in Jeremy Bolen's Site A /
Plot M series (2012).
The thermosteric sea level
change plot is right on
point, but would be nice if someone could put some actual temperature values to this, but it sure looks like a baby hockey stick — how cute.
Your
plot distorts the position, since it includes the step
change coincident upon the Super El Nino of 1997/98, and therefore does not answer the
point I made.
This and the 5 - day running average means there will be
changes in the last 4
points plotted when new data are added.
Specifically, it
plots a ratio of 30 - year NOAA temperature
changes to the cumulative amount of CO2 tonnes emitted up to that
point.
Download NOAA 2013 year - end global monthly dataset used for difference calculations and
plots (NOAA
changes all historical data
points for each new month's dataset, so «C3» will retain this 2013 dataset for the near future).
The
change in behaviour of the
plots between Regions 1 and 2 is so pronounced that it suggests that some major
change in the atmosphere occurs at this
point.
The way I see it, if you get various data
points of ocean heat content, you then have to
plot a trend to see how that is
changing with the other
changes in incoming and outgoing radiation and greenhouse gases andland use etc..
We can see this more clearly by
plotting just the corrected data (black lines are a piecewise - linear fit by
change -
point analysis):
A
plot of the distribution of model
points at 1990, 2000 and 2010 would be really nice; I would expect the distribution to
change, being less skewed in 2010 than in the previous «fitted» decades.