Sentences with phrase «point about evil»

It is only by combining an iconic white - guy - hero - genre with one of the few credible black - guys - with - guns genres that Tarantino can make his larger point about the evils of slavery and racism.

Not exact matches

«The whole point about behavioural analysis,» explained Peter St. John, a retired professor of international relations with expertise in aviation security, «is that people can't intend evil like bombing planes and so on without showing some of it in their behaviour.»

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

I've made it a point to read what I could in depth about the Holocaust, and the incredible evil done to so many innocents breaks my heart.

This brings us then to the real point of disagreement between Plantinga and Griffin: the question of whether every actual world must necessarily contain self - determining entities and hence whether an omnipotent being can unilaterally bring about any world devoid of genuine evil.

Likewise, evil is not exclusive to catholics priest therefore my point that instead of complaining about catholicism and bashing «catholics», we should all condemn pedophiles, regardless of who they are or their roles in their communitiies.

I kind of like what hippy said about good or evil depends on your point of view.

At this point, we got into some of the nitty gritty, as I asked him about things like the Problem of Evil and the preordained damnation of the non-elect.

I do hear your points that you think I have not seen the need for warning of danger, that you believe I think of it as «unChristian» to talk about such things, and that you may even believe that my comments are akin to protecting evil deeds and harming the innocent, using the bible as a proof texting weapon to that end and contributing to a problem of church becoming fake and shallow while claiming to be deep and pious.

-- The point wasn't why I'm a Christian, Bob, it was why I believe in the Bible's teaching about evil.

Kauffman pointed out that «Jesus talks about loving our enemies and praying for our enemies and doing good to those who do evil to us»; more than this, on the cross «Jesus allowed himself to die, and absorbed in his own being the violence around him, rather than countering that violence.»

And as I pointed out in Steve Taylor's songs about «Baby Doe» and «Lifeboat» evil is declared good and good as evil.

I wonder if we will ever get to the point as a nation where the vast majority of us DO NOT believe in Iron Age myths from the Middle East about sky - gods and evil ground spirits.

This point about freedom is a standard ingredient in Whiteheadian discussions of the problem of evil.

When we think about modern culture, we might naturally gravitate towards some of its «evils» (more on this in a moment), but there is so much good to point out.

I do, of course, believe that all the evidence points to God's existence (even sin and evil), but I am not about to get into all of that right now.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

I do not think it silly to point out that, whatever their differences, Yoder and Niebuhr do share a belief that the life and work of Jesus Christ teaches us that there is something evil about all acts of force, regardless of the goals or intentions of those acts.

One of the most well - known passages in Atlas Shrugged goes on and on about the evil of religion in so many ways; John Galt doesn't use this as an incidental point in his radio address but makes no bones that there is no religion in his world view.

In 2 Peter 3:3 - 7, he returns to the topic of the flood to make his point once again about how God will deal with people who follow their own evil desires in the last days.

Lynn June 29, 2010 1:58 pm Anyway, my point was not about all the evils related to alcohol.

Anyway, my point was not about all the evils related to alcohol.

Griffin points out that in company with a great many other contributors to the recent literature on the problem of evil, Mackie assumes that an omnipotent being is one who can bring about any state of affairs the description of which is logically consistent.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

If you really think about it, ANYTHING can be considered «good» or «evil», from specific points - of - view.

As William Rowe points out, when a fawn burns to death in a forest fire and no human being ever knows about it, this apparently unnecessary evil does nothing to build the character of human beings.

Although Hasker concludes this argument by pointing out that for it too «it is God who is responsible for the existence of creatures who have the freedom and power to bring about great evils,» I had explicitly said that «God is responsible for [the distinctively human forms of evil on our planet] in the sense of having encouraged the world in the direction that made these evils possible» (Process 75; cf. God 308 - 09).

The cause of this uneasiness becomes clearer if we question Ignatieff's argument at several points: the validity of the moral paradigm itself, the assumptions from which he proceeds, the inconsistencies in how he describes the limits to be observed in doing the «lesser evil,» and his conclusions about specific elements of the war on terror.

Cara brought up an excellent point about degrees of evil when it comes to Nestle, pointing out that, you know, evil does come in shades, and Nestle's got some serious evil going on.

His point is to complicate our view of human behavior and to object to moral certainties that encourage black - and - white judgments about what's good and what's evil.

ANDERSON: I was playing the Resident Evil video games and I disappeared for two weeks, to the point where Jeremy was a little worried about me.

The film is good to excellent in every way except morally, and there it's questionable more often than it should be, not because it's an evil film, or because the filmmaker or actors are bad people, but because the interplay of means and ends has been under - thought or misjudged, to the point where the film becomes a catalog of obscenities: a horror thrill - ride drawn from life, a thing for viewers to test themselves against while feeling just awful about Agu and his country, whatever its name is.

While it's too difficult to go into detail about all that has transpired in the previous 18 movies to get to this point, the audience just needs to know that the unifying thread is the rise of a powerful and evil being named Thanos (Josh Brolin, Only the Brave, 2017).

We also make very clear points about the importance of empathizing with those who are different — and that being different is not synonymous with being bad or sinful or evil.

Not long ago, Resident Evil 6 hit the download market with a new lick of paint to a resounding groan from anyone who even remotely cares about Resident Evil at this point.

Mike is the go to guy for Resident Evil stuff, so you'll most likely hear him tell us all about it at some point on the cast.

Seeing as there are so many stories about a brave warrior beating an evil King, we thought it would be interesting to compose the story from a fresh point of view.

Judgment at this point is the best of the series, and though there are several unanswered questions at the end of the episode, it feels like the disjointed condition of the two stories are about to come together in some bizarre, just - go - with - it fashion that Resident Evil fans are used to at this point.

The great thing about the typewriter as a save point, especially in the first Resident Evil game, is that it just sort of fit with the setting.

The second title Amanita unveiled is Botanicula (pictured), a «simple but quite large» point - and - click adventure about «five tree critters on a quest to save their home's last seed from a pack of evil parasites», releasing at the end of the year.

I don't really understand the Resident Evil series at this point, there are so many characters introduced and discarded that I honestly don't care about any of them anymore.

Gears of War's save system is a definite improvement over God of War's and Resident Evil's: The player can play through the entire game without having worry about finding save points, but can also quit playing at any time and automatically start at the most recent checkpoint.

Johnnie Moore, my frequent collaborator on All Things Evil, makes a good point about Social Objects:

Maybe Hansen is a nutter, who created scare stories about seas boiling, apocalyptic storms, Venusian tipping points, because people weren't taking much notice of his fixation that coal was evil.

I would say lots of people thought it was fun and funny, and a few people got really upset about us defending this terrible Avvo, which of course was the whole point of the post, which is we actually don't think Avvo is terrible, and horrible, and evil.