Not exact matches
This is my response to Limbaugh's dim comment: No Mr. Limbaugh, we only talk
about Jesus Christ to
point out your
hypocrisy on the subject of being good Christians and the vessel of morality.
Once again your se.xual orientation is not my issue, the fact that you preach
about how good you are and how true your belief in the buybull is but yet you are being a hypocritew... hope your god delusion sends you to those burning pits (not that either exist but to
point out the irony of your
hypocrisy and expose you for what you are - a liar; a hypocrite; a poor example of good christard)
I read a lot of Calvinist literature in English and literature classes and in history class the closest thing I saw to anti-Christian sentiment was a comment
about how Islamic scholars in West Africa criticized Christian teachers for doing exactly what the Islamic scholars had been doing (the
hypocrisy was clearly
pointed out).
Typical CNN feedback that a story
about a man sentenced to die for being a Christian and refusing to convert to Islam would bring out all the Christian - haters instead of the death penalty haters or people
pointing out the
hypocrisy of Islam.
I don't think it was the healing that was the thrust of what was controversial and upset leaders, but when it was done on the Sabbath and in a synagogue, overriding their protocol
about Sabbath rest with him
pointing out the
hypocrisy them criticising him while at the same time untying their donkey, say, on the Sabbath.
Now let me explain the
point about Marx, Leviticus and
hypocrisy.
So while the
hypocrisy you
point out is valid and it makes me angry all over again
about the ouster of this team's architect, I'm cautious in embracing a public outcry against it.
Luckily, he's matched by a superior supporting cast of actors who deliver equally assured performances here, even when the people they're playing feel less organic than machined to make a political
point about tolerance and
hypocrisy: To name just a few, Jesse Plemons, Rory Cochrane, Bill Camp, Ben Foster and the ubiquitous Timothée Chalamet are all on hand for some duration of the journey; Rosamund Pike, as a woman they meet named Rosalie Quaid, delivers a searing portrayal of trauma at its most physically excruciating and psychically disorienting.
That's all I set out to
point out — I wasn't pretending to want to post anything
about the science at the time, so you can't accuse me of
hypocrisy on that score.
Caveat re: Mr. Zehner: He is an irrationally anti-nuclear power, Church of Anti-consumption (albeit good - intentioned) religious zealot, BUT, he knows his stuff
about solar power and makes a good
point about the gross ineffectiveness and
hypocrisy of solar / wind.
A promising book by an «ecologist,» called «The Wind Farm Scam» is tainted by climate denial and it's common in other books like «Paradise Destroyed...» These people make good
points about the economic & environmental
hypocrisy of wind sprawl, yet foolishly question the existence of gaseous atmosphere sprawl (it's really all the same bloat).
President Trump's obsession with Amazon has reportedly cost the US business $ 53 billion, but right or wrong on any one
point, his stance on Amazon's penchant for dodging federal taxes reeks of
hypocrisy, and his latest accusation
about failing to pay state taxes simply wrong.
Two of the top three comments in the thread
point out the
hypocrisy that countless Apple (and Google) fans have been talking
about ever since Google's press conference this past Wednesday.