Emilia — I really like
your points about cost versus nutrition.
SNA does make a good
point about cost... while my participation is back to where it was, my food costs are about 25 % higher (some due to the new requirements, some due to weather / gas / transportation / etc).
His point about the costs associated with surveys and observations is crucial.
Jordan makes a good
point about the cost of editing.
I work in the lending industry, and you definitely raise a valuable
point about the cost of money.
Bill understood and appreciated
my point about cost — he had similar concerns before he bought his policy.
Your response was to ignore
his point about costs and to list: 1.
Bill understood and appreciated
my point about cost — he had similar concerns before he bought his policy.
Not exact matches
Mulvaney also preemptively addressed questions
about the
cost of the wall and how many miles could be paid for by the requested sum,
pointing to the still - uncertain plans for its construction.
As the price of fuel has dropped, it's been taking up a smaller and smaller share of these expenses, to the
point that now, he estimates, fuel only makes up
about 15 percent of airlines» spending (assuming their other
costs have remained roughly equal).
The dissident franchisee group was quick to
point out it believed the plan was ill - conceived and would
cost individual restaurant owners
about $ 450,000.
Chase had already signed up
about 400 customers on the basis, in part, of that price
point, but she quickly realized she would not succeed as a company if she didn't adjust the
cost.
As the Journal story
points out, YES signed a deal with the Yankees to lock up TV rights for 30 years at a
cost of
about $ 1.5 billion.
Robert Burgess, editor at Head for
Points, talks
about the most
cost - effective way to use air miles and which airlines have the best schemes.
For an e-commerce business there are a number of
costs that merit closer analysis as they can
point to greater insights
about the business.
The distance between Stockholm and Helsinki is
about 300 miles, and doing the math, the figure
points to
about $ 36.7 million
cost per kilometer or
about $ 64 million for every mile.
«Each one percentage
point cut to the corporate income tax rate
costs the federal government
about $ 2 billion in annual revenues,» wrote the authors, one of whom was CLC chief economist Andrew Jackson...
On average, mobile advances like these could help generate an average global expense ratio improvement of
about 500 basis
points, from 58 % to 53 % as banks reduce the
costs of the branch network and the
costs of shipping and storing cash and checks.
Don't forget to think
about the break - even period, or the
point at which you earn back the
costs of refinancing through your interest savings.
As the gap widens, it creates rising uncertainty
about how excess debt servicing
costs will ultimately be allocated, and at the
point at which this uncertainty is high enough to alter materially the behavior of economic agents, and so lower the net asset value of the economic entity, the borrowing country has «excessive» debt.
The origin was the fateful decision to reduce the goods and services tax (GST) by two
points,
costing the federal government
about $ 14 billion annually and growing.
If you read the response in context, it is not quite as ridiculous as it sounds: Bowden's
point seems to be that the regulatory burdens that his questioner complained
about aren't that important, because the private equity business is so good that the additional regulatory
costs are easy to bear, and well worth it to avoid messing up a good racket.
Ezra Klein: Also, to just build on that
point a little bit, every Western European nation and also Canada and also Israel gets
about... It's
about half of what we pay, it's not as cheap as Singapore, but if we only managed to cut our
costs in half, that would also be a big advance.
I understand that startups normally need capital froman an IPO or need to issue more stocks in order to finance R&D (well, as just
about all companies pursue immediate profits not at the
cost of the future, the second option is becoming forgettable), but what's the
point when the whole world is now run by a few corporate cartels?
One good
point about ETF's that is often overlooked is that they have no minimum investment amount (besides the
cost of a single share).
Given this data, if at the given time - frame the
cost of the pair of currencies gets to 1.30667 we must swiftly enter a «put» prediction as a «retracement of price» is anticipated to come
about as the price has risen above the upper pivot
point.
The weighted average of the MERs charged by the component ETFs works out to
about 21 basis
points per year, which means the Sleepy Portfolio
costs about $ 275 every year or
about 75 cents a day — less than half the
cost of a large double - double these days.
Great
point about the high start - up
costs.
McFarlane is going to tell you that $ 30,000 compounded at 8.25 % for 40 years is going to equal $ 888,000 in foregone wealth when you retire, and he is going to
point out that a one - day wedding is going to
cost you
about $ 35,000 in easy, annual dividend money that you could be having deposited into your checking account each year.
This has forced up
costs so that the lower breakeven
points brought
about by production efficiencies may not obtain.
If you end up working with a lender that offers no closing
costs for your refinance, consider yourself lucky — you don't have to worry
about a breakeven
point.
I'm sure Wall Street would hate to have to compete with a solid plan with an operating
cost of
about 3 to 5 basis
points.
As my colleague Tim Green
pointed out in an in - depth article
about Buffett's IBM investment, most of IBM's revenue comes from clients who use multiple IBM solutions, which creates big switching
costs (this is what Buffett means by «stickiness»).
Of course, if Israel were the only country in the world where we send either 1) direct aid and / or 2) provide a military presence and which had free universal health care and / or free or low
cost secondary education, you might actually be making a
point about there being something unique in the US / Israeli relationship, as opposed to, the $ 100s of billions we're sending around the world to hundreds of other countries which provide the same benefits.
While I'm not inclined to ascribe motive in this case and prefer to give Ham the benefit of the doubt that he holds his position because his conscience demands it, I think these folks bring up a good
point about how we can become so heavily invested in a certain ideology that change comes at enormous
cost.
When I imagined what it would be like to give generously without wondering what is in it for me, to give up my grudges and learn to diffuse hatred with love, to stop judging other people once and for all, to care for the poor and seek out the downtrodden, to finally believe that stuff can't make me happy, to give up my urge to gossip and manipulate, to worry less
about what other people think, to refuse to retaliate no matter the
cost, to be capable of forgiving to the
point of death, to live as Jesus lived and love as Jesus loved, one word came to my mind: liberation.
(
point to consider, those red states that are screaming
about not wanting to have to share the
cost of other peoples healthcare... wait for it... have by far the highest rates of obesity)
When something so stupidly simple and absurdly quick
costs so much, arguing
about who should pay the bill misses the
point.
My last
point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care
about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out
costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something
about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...
But the
point that is most relevant here is that Rauch's arguments are
about social consequences and
costs, they are not
about the principles that constitute marriage as such.
It's none of our business what MLK thought
about the «Gay» lifestyle... hell, his battle for the people of color's equality of life
cost him his life; So, I'm sure he didn't have time to even discuss or ponder what people choose to do with their affections, nor did he care at that
point.
All the other
points (
about eggs, dairy, the
cost of the food etc.) are really well explained too!
The only negative I can
point out has nothing to do with the flavor - it's just, the
cost of all the ingredients makes this
about a $ 20 cheesecake.
What has made him believe that we possess the physical midfielder which
cost us in so many of the big games to the
point he wouldn't take Alex Song on loan or talk to Newcastle
about Tiote?
I also think your
point about wondering if they would take Vea because they wouldn't pay Poe / Hankins works in his favor, as they can get similar production from a younger player at a way lower
cost.
I agree with your
point about QB
costs.
You can spout off
about sticking together and all that but at some
point when the same guy or guys keep screwing up over and over and it is
costing you games, somebody has to stand up and say so.
By far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty statements, just cold hard facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still
pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk
about the consequences as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one of the most important transfer windows of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which
cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke of the highest order, lack of respect, lack of shame and lack order, i despise him
This is exactly the type of tactical ineptness we have been talking
about costing us
points.
I am only concerned
about the lack of physical presence that is missing in so many games and
costing us
points.