He then makes a decent
point about government borrowing growing under the Tories.
Your point about the government not taking the proceeds of a sale of one of its own assets is just bizarre.
George Osborne, the shadow chancellor, has this afternoon commented on the matter to the Manchester Evening News - and whilst he repeats Mr Grayling's
point about the Government's inconsistency, he seems to suggest that the ban was wrong:
I think you have a valid
point about the government fixing many problems.
Not exact matches
Republican Senator Rand Paul
pointed to the market sell - off last week as evidence of an «undercurrent of unease» among investors worried
about government debt and inflation.
These riches were at least as important to the Eritrean
government as they were to Nevsun: by various estimates Bisha would provide
about US$ 1 billion in royalties and revenues over its life, and raise the country's annual GDP by several percentage
points.
As is often the case, the
Government is busy
pointing their finger at energy providers and energy providers are busy
pointing their finger at the
Government - but no one seems to be doing anything
about it, and the people (and businesses) of South Australia are caught in the middle.
He's less hopeful
about the Bangladeshi
government's initiatives, but says, «I think that part of the key
points of this agreement is that you've got some of the major buyers in Bangladesh working with some of the major trade unions and labour rights groups together to push on Bangladesh and I think that combination is going to be a powerful force.»
Investment - grade corporates pay
about two percentage
points more than short - term
government bonds, and they're less risky than they used to be.
But when you ask what to do
about it, that consensus quickly devolves into finger -
pointing — at recycling companies like Waste Management for failing to innovate, at the American public for their lazy recycling habits, at producers for creating plastic packaging that is increasingly difficult to recycle, and even at the federal
government for not passing strong legislation that encourages better practices.
Merkel, 63, said she was sceptical
about ruling in a minority
government, telling ARD television: «My
point of view is that new elections would be the better path.»
The report
points to September 2015 data released by the
Government Accountability Office, which shows
about 330,000 people, or roughly 11 % of the Americans who've taken out Parent Plus loans, have gone at least a year without making a payment.
Meicun Weng, the founder of Chinese community and news site Boxun (which regularly reports on Chinese human - rights abuses and is blocked in China), drives home the
point about how the Chinese
government wields influence with its economic power.
The 10 - year U.S. Treasury yield rose 5.2 basis
points to 3.035 percent on Wednesday, driven by worries
about the growing supply of
government debt and inflationary pressures from rising oil prices.
If rates stay elevated into May, rates on new
government loans will be
about eight - tenths of a percentage
point higher than they are today.
While the
government's policies have remained opaque, officials with the Russian Central Bank have talked
about blocking the access of people inside the country to virtual currency websites, and Mr. Putin has
pointed out the many potential illegal uses of the technology.
«Each one percentage
point cut to the corporate income tax rate costs the federal
government about $ 2 billion in annual revenues,» wrote the authors, one of whom was CLC chief economist Andrew Jackson...
It
pointed out that the rule had led to some distortions in the market and the Central bank had advised the
government about the same.
They quickly
pointed out the faults in Clark's boasts
about her gender equitable
government, which cut essential services women need: child care, family and poverty legal services, education, healthcare, the list goes on.
The origin was the fateful decision to reduce the goods and services tax (GST) by two
points, costing the federal
government about $ 14 billion annually and growing.
Rubin's curious
point in the OpEd is that it wasn't «courses in economics or finance» from his days at Harvard that prepared him «for working at Goldman Sachs and in the
government» (notice the almost decade - long stretch at Citigroup is completely missing) but instead «the key was Professor Demos's philosophy course and the conversations
about existentialism in coffee shops around campus.»
Share: FacebookTwitterLinkedinGoogle + emailIf asked what the federal
government is doing to cut carbon pollution, most Canadians would likely
point to the policy they've heard the most
about: carbon pricing.
If asked what the federal
government is doing to cut carbon pollution, most Canadians would likely
point to the policy they've heard the most
about: carbon pricing.
The BofA Merrill Lynch high - yield index is trading at roughly 600 basis
points versus
government bonds, but if energy, metals and mining is excluded, it's
about 80 basis
points less in terms of spread.
As its defenders
point out, it will be difficult for the U.S.
government to completely stamp out Bitcoin use, since there is no central repository for the currency and no central authority that can be targeted (there is a FAQ with some responses to popular misconceptions
about Bitcoin, including the central authority question).
In my recent National Post column, I make reference to some back - of - envelope calculations to the effect that replacing the fiscal anchor of balanced budgets to one of a fixed debt - GDP ratio allows the federal
government to increase spending by 1.2 percentage
points of GDP, or by
about $ 25 billion.
For «A» rated corporates, the spread over
government bonds of comparable maturity is currently
about 100 basis
points, which is noticeably wider than a couple of years ago (Graph 32).
DVD of the week: McMafia Crime drama McMafia is a rollicing adventure that makes some good
points about the extent to which dirty money has corrupted
governments around the world.
That's a good
point, our
government is racking up debt faster than locust on a wheat field, and we're arguing
about gay - marriage, race and still abortion issues.
When in the 1970s there began to be much discussion
about «mediating structures» and voluntarism, when Ronald Reagan urged us to rely on
government less and on ourselves more, when George Bush talked
about a «thousand
points of light,» those of a statist mind - set groused that it was all a scheme to cut back on
government social services.
* My
point, again, as I understand it in terms of our 1st amendment, and freedom of speech, was to (build in) a «wall» of separation of church and
government... (because) of «Christianity,» since you are talking
about our country, so as not to have - anyone's freedom of speech and their civil liberties trampled on.
It will have been noted that in its windy statement
about RE in the English baccalaureate, the CES doesn't
point to RE as being a way in to religious faith: that wouldn't be of much interest to the
government, of course, but it ought to be for Catholics.
Fair enough, I mean, you make a valid
point that one of the biggest things
about the democractic party is trying to legislate so many different things when there are certain aspects of my life that the
government should have 0 say over.
Advocates of world
government were at the time divided
about the UN, some saying it was a step in the right direction, others
pointing out that you don't leap a great chasm by taking one step at a time.
But from the
point of view of the tribes, whose religious tradition, as the justices admitted, would be «devastated» by the
government's action, there was nothing neutral
about the destruction of the forest.
The first and most obvious is how it reduces a complex conversation
about government size to a snarky talking
point.
Jesus Christ sacrifice represented 4 very important
points: (A) channel for us when praying in forgiving our sins (B) The opportunity to learn the truth
about Jehovah God's Universal Soverign
Government and the role Jesus would play as King of the government along side his Father Je
Government and the role Jesus would play as King of the
government along side his Father Je
government along side his Father Jehovah God.
Yuri Wijting and Mark Burgher You make good
points, especially
about the power of the
government to maintain peace and security.
Anyway, it doesn't matter since we are a secular country, with specific prohibitions against mixing church and state (for good reason), and marriage, from a
government point of view, is
about financial and human rights.
But Kennedy was talking
about the promotion of religion by
government to the
point that a candidate must pass a religious test to be elected.
I thought that was the
point of the whole discussion
about eagle feathers and how long it takes to get them from some
government agency in Denver.
My last
point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care
about making a change... start at the lowest levels of
government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the
government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the
government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something
about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...
He
points to the courageous attempts of some U.S.
government officials to warn their superiors
about the atrocities of Operation Condor, the dictators» politically most explosive antisubversive organization.
ACCC Chairman, Rod Sims has addressed the RBB Economics Conference in Sydney backing competition reforms proposed by the Harper Review Panel - three
points were highlighted: (1) need to make a choice
about s 46 - clearly preferencing a change to an SLC approach; (2) need to extend the Act to cover more
government activities; (3) need to debate and decide the issues around competition advocacy and market studies.
And yes, no question that pink slime is gross no matter how depicted and I'm really glad he talked
about it, but I also take Dana's
point that pink slime has little to do with local school districts and a lot to do with the federal
government.
The discussion here has been very instructive and I can actually see valid
points on both sides of the issue (less
government vs. more
government intervention) when talking
about children's nutrition at school.
Excellent post Bettina — what an important
point you make
about these types of isolated incidents creating negative perceptions of much - needed
government child nutrition programs (not to mention the flaws in reporting these incidents that sometimes make them downright inaccurate).
Fowler
points to the parallels between the Conservatives in the early nineties and the present day
government, as it wrestles with allegations of sleaze, deep divisions and enmities within the Parliamentary Party, growing fears
about the economy and employment, and a series of seemingly unstoppable accidents.
These are precisely the
points that Ed Miliband and Chuka Umunna have been making
about intelligent
government.
The result was the opposite: the isolated interference brought
about a condition which — from the
point of view of the
government — is even more undesirable than the previous state of affairs which the
government wanted to alter.