Sentences with phrase «point article which»

At some point any article which says «expensive» I am going to ignore.

Not exact matches

In 2010, Reynolds launched First Word, which boils market news down to a few bullet points, so frantic traders don't have to read entire articles.

There are dozens, if not hundreds, of articles and books written on ecommerce and the importance of having your potential customer click as few buttons and see as few pages as possible between the point at which they're interested to the point they've completed a transaction.

«What I'm trying to drive at, is whether there are any circumstances in which you'd go back to the EU on certain points, for example, if the resolution were amended to say Parliament would like the government to seek an extension of the Article 50 process — is that possible?»

A September 23, 2016 Yahoo News article by investigative reporter Michael Isikoff said Page met with Sechin during the trip, at which point Sechin reportedly raised the possibility of lifting US sanctions on Russia if Trump became president.

«Francis can rattle off lists of ingredients and point out which cookies are gluten - and nut - free,» the article elaborates.

Excess return: the amount by which a portfolio's performance exceeds its benchmark, net (in the case of the analysis in this article) or gross of operating expenses, in percentage points.

First, the article points out that we've exhausted a fiscal response unless we plunge into even deeper deficits, which is always a possibility.

As my colleague Tim Green pointed out in an in - depth article about Buffett's IBM investment, most of IBM's revenue comes from clients who use multiple IBM solutions, which creates big switching costs (this is what Buffett means by «stickiness»).

You pointed to a dispute of how neandertahal DNA didn't get included in human DNA, But that article doesn't change the FACT that neanderthals existed, which proves the bible wrong.

Postponing doing so until the advent of death emerges on the horizon proves to be futile, at which point, as highlighted by the respective article, talking about family matters takes precedence... empirically validated by the related professionals in this particular field.

But Mr. Hayward you use her article as a jumping off point for your own projections on how «religious» people see you SBNR types — liberal, educated, open minded, etc. which doesn't even come from her but from the Shambala Sun!

The underlying assumption of this notion, as Christian D. von Dehsen, who helped research this article, has pointed out, «is a form of moralism about homosexuality which, in essence, supplants the gospel.»

I will respond simply to two of his points which touch the central point of the original article: first, whether or not vowed chastity (or «celibacy») can enable a fuller living - out of the loving of Christ the priest and second, whether the Council Fathers in Presbyterorum ordinis intended more than simply defending celibacy in the Latin rite as a «useful discipline».

I think one thing that has been overlooked by most of the other comments is why the hell does a cleric of a religion that is supposed to not even have a hierarchy have $ 6000, which as the article pointed out is more than 6 times what the average Pakistani makes in a year, to throw around...

In that article I pointed to those classic documents that unmistakably define the special character of the American faith, the documents from which I have just quoted.

Wow, you are such a parody of what this article is about, Even finished with a biblical verse, which doesn't actually have many objective interpretations, so you conveniently use the interpretation that best suits your point.

But re-reading Ezekiel 16:49, which explains the sin Sodom committed, it seems the whole point of this article must be obfuscated somehow?

Although there are other points in Neville's provocative article which perhaps ought to be taken up, I do not feel that this response should become another book!

Lycidias please point to the article which you state I cut and pasted from.

So this is where I go back to the original article and my original point - if we are merely a random function of the universe, made for no real purpose in a universe which is destined to burn out and effectively die, why bother??

This point is similar to the distinction Thomas Aquinas makes between some articles of faith which are as such secundum se and others in ordine ad alia (ST 2 - 2, q. 1, a. 6).

Which was, of course, the point of the article.

The article points out (which is true) that members of the church are allowed ONLY to do the work for their own ancestors.

And, although, I'm not convinced of yours, or the article's, position, I would point out that the US is a free market and unlike national defense the government does not dictate which doctors are hired or from where.

Amid all the flurry, articles, tracks, rebuttal tracks, podcasts and discussion that have popped up to address the #CHHbeef phenomenon (which is barely two weeks old), perhaps the most important point is consistently missed.

I find this article completely missing the point — It asks us to pick a set of beliefs and principles as a group which is the opposite of what this groups wants and needs.

For instance, making allusions to being «caught up in the clouds together» may reinforce the idea of the rapture, which as the article points out is a relatively new concept in Christian theology which can a have a big impact on how one imagines salvation.

A paragraph can only say so much, and the longer article to which the post points says much more.

To be fair, there are some parts of the article that point out some problems in the Faith — such as the prevalence of the health and wealth gospel (which is clearly at odds with scripture).

This is a point which Gerhard von Rad makes with great emphasis in his article «Shalom in the Old Testament,» Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed.

Shortly before his death, Carl Gustav Jung wrote a sobering article pointing out that relatively few people take seriously the fact that man has an unconscious mind which influences everything he does.

Which, of course, perfectly illustrated one point Esolen made in his articles.

A pro-life Catholic and Muslim have co-authored an article in the Muslim Weekly outlining the success of the gay agenda since the war which has reached its high point in the recent Sexual Orientation Regulations.

Humility does not prevent us pointing out that Faith has published numerous articles over recent years which have addressed in detail many of the attacks levelled against the Church in the debate.

In an article on «The Impact of Pastoral Psychology on Theological Thought,» Tillich emphasizes this point: «Intellectual and moral preaching fails to reach those levels of the personal life which can, however, be opened by authentic symbols — symbols which themselves have roots in the unconscious depths of individuals and groups.»

An article in the latest Harvard Law Review points to the wider significance of the historic moment which the Hobby Lobby decision represents.

I was delighted to see that Rod Dreher has used my article on the church in exile as the starting point for a discussion of which Christian tradition will prove most helpful to Christians in the U.S. in the coming years.

It's simple as this, Rick Santorum appeals to the less educated, extremely conservative and more bigot minded segment of rural America, which is largely dominated by Born again evangelicals, who as the article points out have a misguided view that that Mormons aren't Christian, and in their misguided bigotry seem to be voting against Romney based upon their religion rather than for a good candidate who can win the general election.

Either they need to fire all employees and dismiss all students who aren't Catholic (so they can say it's a religious issue for all that the insurance would cover) or follow the law (which by the way permits employees too opt out from the controversial parts of the coverage as sort of pointed out in the article).

This is in the main true, but, as I have pointed out elsewhere, Suarez shifts the emphasis in his metaphysics of material substances from the phenomenon of substantial change to the problem of substantial unity, which is precisely the problem that so vexed both Leibniz and Leclerc (For an account of Suarez's metaphysics of material substances, see my article «The Importance of the Concept of Substantial Unity in Suarez's Hylomorphism», in the special Suarez volume of the American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.)

His historical vantage point yielded fruitful insights into contemporary American life, which he presented in a highly readable series of books, articles, and review essays for the New York Review of Books.

Case in point, this article from UK publication The Sun, which is commemorating the 200th anniversary of Mary Shelly's Frankenstein by dragging the hyper - sensitive, easily offended, safe space - obsessed millennial generation for, uh, correctly understanding the book.

Good article which makes some valid points.

Before the season we wrote our annual College Basketball and Betting Against the Public article, which found that road underdogs of 10 - 20 points had won at a 54.6 % clip since 2008.

ANYWAY, I don't want to beat a dead foot, here, so let's get to the point of the article, which is to guess at what would have happened if Pujols signed somewhere else.

By far the best article I have ever read on this site, there was no bias or empty statements, just cold hard facts, the writer even respected wengers budget but still pointed to where he should've improved, there are no excuses, what you read is literrally all u get with arsene, if you gave him a budget of 9m or 1 billion, he will ALWAYS take the risk cause he doesn't give a fk about the consequences as if he was a teenager raging through puberty, his stubborn is absolutely pathetic, can you believe he turned down signing a keeper when almunia was shocking, can you believe he didn't sign a CB when squillaci was awful, can you believe that he REFUSED to sign a CDM for almost 8 years, CAN you believe on one of the most important transfer windows of arsenals history, arsene decided to go host charity matches in rome, that's right instead of trying hard for the fans that have respected him and pay him one of the highest managerial wages in the world, he decided to do what he pleased as usual, cause he doesn't answer to anyone, nor does he giving a flying fk, gazidis a man i thought was also a crook went and did arsene's job for him and at least got us a striker (which cost us the title in january last season) and arsene foolishly proclaims that «if i was here we wouldn't of signed danny» meaning we wouldn't of had ANY recognised cf till giroud recovered, arsene wenger is a joke of the highest order, lack of respect, lack of shame and lack order, i despise him

A side of «what Griezmann can learn at Arsenal», which is the peak point of this article (don't drunk while you write Pat J, hahaha...), I see Griezmann as extraordinary person.

after yesterday, s win against palace which was a good 3 points, i, d love justarsenal to write an article on the quality of the pitches!not only our game suffered because of it but we were lucky no one got injured some would be forgiven to think this was an intended ploy by palace to win the game!!

But it is a dangerous course of censorship to judge, which topics and points of view should be allowed as comments to various articles.