Sentences with phrase «point attack on»

They even reproduce a nine - point attack on their wing by the (non - Southern Baptist) South Carolina Baptist Fellowship.

As students marched in Washington, DC, on Saturday, Rubio made no mention of the pointed attacks on him.

Last week, Peter Hain launched a pointed attack on the Welsh Lib Dems, saying that the «destructive» Tory policies in London could be «mirrored» in Wales

Alan Johnson, the health secretary, will tomorrow launch a pointed attack on David Cameron, saying the recession has seen the Tories revert to their default position of cutting public services at the expense of the most vulnerable people in society.

In a pointed attack on the Michigan Education Association, the Michigan legislature last week cleared a bill that would set fines and penalties for local teachers who strike over contract disputes and limit the teachers» union's collective - bargaining clout.

While the ST carries a more pointed attack on NTR's corp governance http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/Business/article1452995.ece And SBP has an in - depth article if you hv access

Not exact matches

A source familiar with the White House emails on the Benghazi talking point revisions say that State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland was raising two concerns about the CIA's first version of talking points, which were going to be sent to Congress: 1) The talking points went further than what she was allowed to say about the attack during her state department briefings; and, 2) she believed the CIA was attempting to exonerate itself at the State Department's expense by suggesting CIA warnings about the security situation were ignored.

At one point in late August, Fox chairman Roger Ailes released a public statement that said Trump's «unprovoked attack» on Kelly was «as unacceptable as it is disturbing.»

But on Wednesday, the company provided new details of the 2014 attack, and once again pointed to «the same state - sponsored actor» who committed the 2014 breach.

Still, the question remains whether the Obama administration scrubbed the talking points and used the video red herring in order to cover up the fact that they failed to prevent a planned terrorist attack that killed four Americans on the anniversary of September 11.

At this point, the indications are that Aghdam's attack was the kind of event that has become all too familiar in American society: an isolated act committed by a person with a shaky grip on reality.

Joey «Accordian Guy» Devilla does a great job at rebutting the silly attack on his blog, poignantly pointing out that, no, space exploration is indeed about science, and its Earthly benefits have been enormous:

As The New York Times pointed out, the proposed attack «in some respects resembles the limited types that many presidents — Ronald Reagan in Grenada, Bill Clinton in Kosovo and even Mr. Obama in Libya — have launched on their own.»

Although some have pointed out that the attacks could help May — who is generally perceived to be tough on immigration and security — others suggest that it could hurt her.

Most security attacks are targeted at a few weak points on your PC that aren't that hard to protect.

Dozens of firms rushed to contain the damage from possible security weak points following the anti-secrecy organization's revelations, although some said they needed more detailed information on what the U.S. intelligence agency was up to before they can thwart suspected, but previously hidden attacks.

The White House has insisted that it made only a «stylistic» change to the intelligence agency talking points from which Rice suggested on five Sunday talk shows that demonstrations over an anti-Islamic video devolved into the Benghazi attack.

But doing so would miss a vital point: the endowment tax is an attack on academic freedom, and it is an attack on all colleges and universities.

And on Wednesday, Trump tweeted a pointed ad hominem attack, saying that Mueller «is most conflicted of all,» and accused Mueller of going «crazy» because there's «no collusion.»

His tweets have actually pointed out the real issues of Chinese expansion and Chinese attacks on American workers.

At one point, the pigs claim that dissent is an attack on the entire farm instead of reasonable attempts to preserve the original goals of the farm.

However, it's worth noting that at the time of the attack on the World Trade Center, the Dow was already down 1,500 points from the year's high.

The decision came just days after a spill on TransCanada's existing Keystone line in South Dakota on Thursday sparked new attacks by environmentalists who pointed to the event as something the state could expect if the project is approved.

To those who argue that Hamze did not condemn: «radical islam» I point to this quote in the article itself: «Terrorists attacked us on 9/11, Mr. West.

Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational atheists who post on CNN are dedicated to reason only as long as it supports their positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.

If those are the best examples of the attacks on Christians you just proved Primewonks point.

For Muslims, that talking point is code for whitewashing decades of atrocities committed against the people of Gaza: the kids killed on the Gaza Beach, the civilians bombed in the most densely populated cage in the world, and the attacking of civilians who resort to donkey carts for transportation.

My point was that if they hadn't charged in here, complaining... attacking... and had followed the procedure Jesus gave us, that there would have been no feeling of having been picked on.

He desired to hear more, and the important point to note is that St Francis did not directly attack the tenets of Islam, but rather focused on expounding the Christian Gospel.

Alfred Neumann in Six of Them tells of a German professor of law who continued teaching in the early days of the Hitler regime, lecturing on justice with pointed reference to its subversion in the Nazi state.36 When fired from his position, the professor, his wife, and a loyal band of students publish secretly copies of his lectures and other material attacking the injustices of the regime.

You wil welcome these Muslims into your country and they will use that center as a meeting point to plan their terrorist attacks on you.

Since the Bush Administration was convinced from the outset that the attack pointed to Al Qaeda, it would have been a smart move for President Bush to invite Osama bin Laden to meet him on neutral ground for frank dialogue and guarantee his safety in doing so.

This certainly looks like a commitment to the tradition attacked by (3) but we shall be seeing that it is doubtful how deep the divergence between our two thinkers really goes even on this point.

This month, Christianity magazine reports on Todd Bentley, attacked by some for his exotic claims of angelic visitations and for his forceful and loud style, while others point to an extraordinary sense of God's presence when he preaches...

After I pointed this out to him he responded with letting me know how much he appreciated my civil exchange with him, and then launched into a nearly identical repeat of the denial of the problems and an attack on those who would speak up about it.

On the other hand, if you want to display the crossed beams because you feel the symbol makes a point and you want people to know that YOUR god was there, or that the attack was on YOUR religion... then that is exactly the reason * not * to display the crossed beamOn the other hand, if you want to display the crossed beams because you feel the symbol makes a point and you want people to know that YOUR god was there, or that the attack was on YOUR religion... then that is exactly the reason * not * to display the crossed beamon YOUR religion... then that is exactly the reason * not * to display the crossed beams.

You are welcome to disagree, and you are free to do so in whatever manner you choose; if your response is some type of irrational, hate - driven attack on someone else's way of life, though, you really are contributing more to my point then your own.

He points out how Reinhold Niebuhr gave establishment antievangelicalism a last whirl in an attack on Billy Graham.

In the third of a century since then, the attacks on moderate evangelicals have come from the fundamentalist right — ask Graham about that — while moderates and liberals have done what moderates and liberals are supposed to do: they say they see some neoevangelical points, and they issue some cease - fires.

They say that religious people are intolerant of other beliefs and that may be so to a point, on the other hand atheists commit the same «sin» when they attack people who freely choose to believe in something different.

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

And once again, the angry atheists replying to someone who disagrees with their point of view have gone on the emotional attack.

Focusing on three early respondents to Burke on the French Revolution, Blakemore performs successive acts of rhetorical ju - jitsu on them, overturning their arguments at their strongest points of attack.

The atheists on these blogs that attack faith feel that at one point in time, God was not there for them.

This attack on the late Pope continues unabated for several paragraphs; it is worth breaking off at this point, however, to ask a question: if it is true that the late Pope did believe that those loyal to him laid themselves open to attack from certain quarters simply for their loyalty, was there not very good reason for him to believe it?

I may be wrong but I think the point is that some people want to make their disbeleif in religion a personal attack on anyone that does.

Given the implications of the feminists» attack on nouns, replacing third - person masculine pronouns with their feminine counterparts seems only to point to the final inadequacy of any pronouns used in referring to deity.

On the other hand your posts have nothing positive to say, your attack on people and making fun of those who are reaching out to needy kids (case in point this blog) is useless / futile and is helping no causOn the other hand your posts have nothing positive to say, your attack on people and making fun of those who are reaching out to needy kids (case in point this blog) is useless / futile and is helping no causon people and making fun of those who are reaching out to needy kids (case in point this blog) is useless / futile and is helping no cause.

But where Nygren attacks the synthesis by isolating agape from eros as two utterly different conceptions of love, I shall try to show that he focuses on the wrong point.

Your statement is more of a attack on God and really I don't know if other life is out there it would be cool to meet other intelligent life and get their point of view.