Sentences with phrase «point by point why»

Not exact matches

They didn't review what decisions were made, by whom, at what point or why.

The planes won't be ready until 2024 or later, which may be why Trump's tweet pointed out they would be used by «future presidents.»

This selling point appears to be backed up by the numbers: Concur is currently in use in over 90 countries by thousands of companies, and, according to Newell, the company is currently pushing strongly in Canada (which is why they polled Canadians).

He rationalized his decision by pointing out that science has surprisingly little to say on the question of why humans need sleep.

In an analysis penned by Andrew Warford, who is chairman of Maverick's stock committee, the fund set out its thesis for why the smartphone market has hit a «tipping point.»

She also points out that social media may be more corrosive to mental health than, say, gaming (which might also explain why girls, who tend to spend relatively more time on social networks, may be more adversely affected by the rise of smartphones).

Thus the salesperson doesn't feel desperate and can more confidently acquire new business by directing negotiations to the point where the potential customer ends up selling the salesperson on why they should do business together.

But the explanations why the rate fell by nearly half a percentage point in Statistics Canada's latest jobs report hint at another trend — the first wave of baby boomers leaving the workplace.

Of course, with debt in 2016 rising by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP while nominal GDP grew by less than 8 percent, it isn't easy to explain how the real value of assets in China grew by roughly 40 — 45 percentage points of GDP, nor why it is proving so difficult to rein in credit growth without a sharp slowdown in GDP growth.

That's why Check Point decided to step up sales and marketing efforts by rearranging the sales force.

He went on to say that in his opinion «Canadians culturally are quite a bit more utilitarian, more conservative, more practical in some ways [than Americans]» which he points to as being the main reason why initial interactions with Tilt by Canadian users have been less robust than Tilt's experience with American users of the platform.

Homeownership tends to encourage spending on durable goods and hence its depressed levels could explain why real U.S. consumption growth over 2011 - 2017 has been much weaker (by about half a percentage point annualized every quarter) than the pre-recession average.

Why this is important: This describes average amount of net client exposure that is fully hedged at any point in time during a trading day, either internally by matching opposing interest from different clients or externally with the market.

It's no surprise why Ultimate Rewards points are so highly valued by those who enjoy traveling on miles and points.

But MacIntyre's observation also shows why, for non-emotivists, such surveys must always issue in a complete non sequitur: one does not abrogate the Ten Commandments by pointing to the number of murders in Detroit, or the divorce rate in Reno, or the decline in church attendance in Peoria.

The article is written by an athesist who has given extremely good discussion points on the whys and why nots of posting this bill board.

EO: David is doing what all comedians do — taking a point, and stretching it until we laugh... and then David goes one better — by then allowing us to ponder why we find it funny or offensive or odd or....?.

Atheists, if you are so confident that there is no such thing as God, then why are you so intimidated by Him, to the point that you feel compelled to turn others against Him?

[RICHARD SWIFT] I just finished reading The Sun Also Rises by Hemingway.He's really inspiring «cause his writing is just so simple.It's almost to the point of boredom.Like, «Why does he spend a whole chapter on what happened in this bar?»

Like ME II and I have pointed out, it does not matter whether the slave was a slave voluntarily or otherwise, mostly because the passage quoted by ME II also does not focus on why the slave is a slave, but a blanket statement about them all.

It is what has lead me to my veiw that Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out on someone and start forcing their view on others, I see that as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?

So my question to you even before it gets to that point is the same as I have given to others, first why do you hate God so much and second what are you afraid of by switching your faith and it is by faith that you believe there is no God to a belief that God does exist he sent his Son Jesus to the world to redeem you from your evil and hateful ways?

And CMB, like Nonimus has pointed out, the reason why the theory of the big bang (which there was no explosion by the way) is the way it is.

Another «elephant in the room» problem with the «virgin» business, is the question of why, if the point of the text in Mathew is that Mary was a virgin, (to say nothing of the problem raised by the fact that the gospels say he had «brothers», ie James etc), but why does Mathew spend so much time going througn the geneology.

In conclusion it is appropriate to point out that God was always in control of the entire situation, which is why such evil that radiated from Satan was always limited by God's control (Job 1:12; 2:6), and the end saw Satan condemned (Job 42:7 - 8), whilst upright Job was blessed (Job 42:12 - 17)

Which is why I know that last Thursday, my Amazon ranking was all the way down to 4,222 in books (a mere 2,700 points away from John Acuff's Stuff Christians Like and 3,500 points away from Donald Miller» sA Million Miles in a Thousand Years), but that by Sunday night it was back up to 19,501 in books (15,000 points away from Pete Wilson's Plan B and 19,500 points away from Stieg Larsson's The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest).

I even find myself a little mystified by why it was such a big deal back in the day, telling myself, «Well, of course they were going to reconcile at some point, and in certain strategic and economy terms they already had, so why the big fuss?

I will google when I get some more time but a quick point I didn't get, the first paragraph, yes Luke and Acts were written by Luke... I don't think that was ever a disputed points that is why I had reference John and 1 Corithians.

The point of all this was to say - why was it so easy to accept something written by this author when the Bible covers this topic (re: Saul visiting the witch of Endor) and everything else.

I think one thing that has been overlooked by most of the other comments is why the hell does a cleric of a religion that is supposed to not even have a hierarchy have $ 6000, which as the article pointed out is more than 6 times what the average Pakistani makes in a year, to throw around...

One can readily appreciate why some have been searching for new ways of expressing the attitude of faith towards the deepest reality man encounters, that reality to which the Bible points by means of God - language.

I don't know why you thought it was necessary to illustrate your point by detailing how to empty a pocket, but that only proves we are not using THE SAME CONTEXT.

When Wilbur wonders why Charlotte has done so much for him, spinning the webs whose messages garnered for him the reputation as a prize pig, Charlotte responds by pointing to the reciprocal benefits of their friendship.

«When St. John Vianney was asked by some priests why their churches were losing members, he asked them, point blank, «Have you fasted for them?

Rather than attacking with your talking points, fed to you by people adamantly opposed to evolution, why don't you sit down with a book by an expert who LIKES evolution and read their perspective?

Why, they're proving the Vatican's point by even defending themselves.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

Here is a link to a video that is a powerful speech its from an older movie called the dictator, very good movie by the way, Anyway Charlie chaplin plays the part of hitler and uses a very powerful and memorable speach about equality and the way life is moving,» https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WibmcsEGLKo» you have shown nothing but malice in these comments and you wonder why gay's are protrayed as the «bad guys» in video games and movies and if you don't believe that then watch this» https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdmJXHJLZ6M» the point is I will respect the person who is silent, holding a flag that has ever color before i Can or Will ever respect someone like yourself.

You've added another layer by pointing out why I found that theology «true»... Because I already believed I was unworthy of being loved.

The social dimension is especially evident when we are reminded of how and why most people in the world die, a point made by the refugee in chapter six.

This is why a little child, even though self - centered by nature, is not a sinner, and sin is «original» only in the sense that the natural self - centeredness of childhood, if uncurbed, becomes sinful as the individual matures to the point of responsible decision.

This is why, as it was pointed out earlier, Luke - Acts constituted the final development of the Easter narratives among the writings finally accepted by the church as authoritative.

* (I want to point out that by saying «Why would I leave Christianity and the Church...», it doesn't necessarily mean I have.)

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

But if the equal treatment of all by God is the point of this parable, why doesn't Jesus say something to that effect in Mathew 20:16?

If God has become a human being; why should the spoken word be the only means by which we can point to Christ?

But then why not equally call religion an aberration of the digestive function, and prove one's point by the worship of Bacchus and Ceres, or by the ecstatic feelings of some other saints about the Eucharist?

A similar judgment is tendered by William Seager, who points out that if the psychological is supervenient upon the physical, it is so in a way that is crucially different from the way in which liquidity is supervenient upon certain molecular states, because we have no idea as to why the joint activity of insentient neurons should give rise to consciousness (MC 179).

That is why the concluding episode, the deathbed conversion of Lord Marchmain, is the denouement pointed to by the perceptive Cordelia.

Atheism has had many bad actors too, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, etc., most Christian do not point to them as how all atheists act, so why characterize all Christian by the bad actors?