Not exact matches
Risk 1:: Alberta's NDP government raises oil and gas royalty rates Company to
consider: Crescent
Point Energy Corp..
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some
points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense
considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious
energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Arsenal won their fourth game in a row this evening against Everton, but
considering the intense fortnight our players have had we did very well to keep our
energy levels up enough to take the
points.
The release also warned that the city was
considering creating «waste to
energy» facilities, which would use incinerators and «whose siting may be restricted to environmentally overburdened communities of color» — like Hunts
Point.
If scientists can show that CO2 stays put underground — experiments are under way off the coast of Oregon and in Iceland — then basalt could become important
considering how widespread it is,
points out Klaus S. Lackner, director of the Lenfest Center for Sustainable
Energy at the Earth Institute.
Or
consider the nuclear genes of the cells of advanced organisms (eukaryotes): At some early
point in their evolution, these cells gained the help of the genes of a parasite or symbiont that became the mitochondrion, an organelle necessary for
energy production.
The 184 page publication, A Handbook for the States: Incorporating Renewable
Energy into State Compliance Plans for EPA's Clean Power Plan, «was prepared by the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) and the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and is intended as a starting point for states that are considering renewable energy as a compliance tool for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed regulation of carbon emissions from existing power plants (Clean Power Plan).&
Energy into State Compliance Plans for EPA's Clean Power Plan, «was prepared by the American Wind
Energy Association (AWEA) and the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and is intended as a starting point for states that are considering renewable energy as a compliance tool for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed regulation of carbon emissions from existing power plants (Clean Power Plan).&
Energy Association (AWEA) and the Solar
Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and is intended as a starting point for states that are considering renewable energy as a compliance tool for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed regulation of carbon emissions from existing power plants (Clean Power Plan).&
Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and is intended as a starting
point for states that are
considering renewable
energy as a compliance tool for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed regulation of carbon emissions from existing power plants (Clean Power Plan).&
energy as a compliance tool for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed regulation of carbon emissions from existing power plants (Clean Power Plan).»
Another thing to
consider is that unless you are popping caffeine pills (which I don't suggest) or an
energy drink with an ungodly amount of concentrated caffeine (which I also wouldn't suggest), you are having a whole food, actually a whole food steeped in water, but you get the
point.
It is
considered the science of Yoga and its purpose is to bring harmony to the chakras and
energy points throughout our body.
Another important
point to
consider when choosing a healthy
energy bar is protein source and quality.
This text elucidates the entire science of hatha yoga (asana, pranayama, shatkarma, mudra and bandha) as it was conceived and practised not only for healthand fitness but for awakening the vital
energies: pranas, chakras and kundalini shakti.It
points out that hatha yoga is not just a physical practice but a process of cellular transmutation from gross to subtle to divine.Thus hatha yoga was
considered to be the foundation of all higher yogas.
An extensive array of MINIMALISM technology — including Brake
Energy Regeneration, and the Shift
Point Display and Auto Start / Stop function for models with the manual gearbox — allows the engine to work extremely effectively and with impressive efficiency, especially when you
consider the power it develops.
If I put 5 % of my total portfolio in each company now [not
energy] at what
point should I
consider taking some off the top.
I'd
consider Core and Explore and Dividends Deluxe in the future — just that at this
point in life, I don't have the
energy or time to handle individual securities.
«For one thing, every
point of view has its own science and economics to support its contentions, whether it be pro- or anti- pesticide use, free - roaming cats, bird collisions with glass or towers, conflicts with fisheries, land conversion, wind
energy, mining, timbering, climate change, or any other issue we
consider in addressing bird conservation...» [2]
A
point of contention is the definition of what would be
considered an
energy subsidy.
Inspired by growing up in Denmark and Iceland, Eliasson's use of natural elements evokes an awareness of the sublime world around us and how we interact with it; his projects often
point toward global environmental crises and
consider art's power to offer solutions to issues like climate change and renewable
energy.
My
point is that
considering a miserable r2, a widespread divergence problem in tree rings, the unintended use of Tiljander and the fact that W & A had to make up their own statistical validation [RE] I would expect that an Oxford educated math expert might not expend so much
energy defending the hockey stick.
As a starting
point in reviewing procedures, I encourage leadership at the University of Texas
Energy Institute and similar centers focused on energy, the environment and health to consider the structure of the 32 - year - old Health Effects Institute, which was created to conduct independent studies of health impacts of air pollution and is co-funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and the worldwide motor vehicle ind
Energy Institute and similar centers focused on
energy, the environment and health to consider the structure of the 32 - year - old Health Effects Institute, which was created to conduct independent studies of health impacts of air pollution and is co-funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and the worldwide motor vehicle ind
energy, the environment and health to
consider the structure of the 32 - year - old Health Effects Institute, which was created to conduct independent studies of health impacts of air pollution and is co-funded by the Environmental Protection Agency and the worldwide motor vehicle industry.
When
considering this question bear in mind that there are no economical «equivalents» to crude oil, alternative (bio) fuels and generation technologies can at best provide a few percentage
points of the
energy derived from fossil fuels.
C. However, most home owners are now
considering going to the
Point of Use water heating units which removes the waste of
energy and reduces the cost of additional plumbing.
Behind the histrionics and talking
points framing the decades - long battle over the place of nuclear power in America's (and the world's)
energy menu, there have long been hints of a path forward, both for dealing with existing, aging reactors and
considering a new generation of technologies.
The one
point that I see as unassailable is that a UK contribution, by itself, can not make much difference to global climate change mitigation, and must be
considered in the context of a global strategy shared among all
energy - consuming nations.
The
point isn't a «perpetual increase in atmospheric pressure» — that's a misnomer — if you
consider the MASS of the atmosphere that is continuously «pumped» from cold air to hot air to cold air again, high up in the atmosphere — that creates «potential
energy» from the kinetic
energy of the convection — adiabatic expansion of the atmosphere is the result — the adiabatic compression occurs on the return trip of the previously warmed (from radiative
energy) air as it completes the «cycle» as it comes back down!
As for the Sun, well, like AnnaV I
consider that the 2 by far most important factors in climate evolution is the cloudiness because it governs albedo and the large scale oceans» behaviour because that's where the
energy is Again you are so angry at the AGW crowd, that you miss the whole
point: the all - important clouds and albedo vary together, but do not vary with the solar cycle, as far as our observations go, e.g. http://www.leif.org/research/cloud-cover.png and http://www.leif.org/research/albedo.png
These
points are especially critical
considering that for at least the next several decades, by all reasonable estimates, global
energy demand will continue to grow.
They also
point to the importance of ensuring that the
energy needs of the poorest members of society are
considered and adequately taken into account.
The WEO is
considered to be the annual reference
point for the global
energy industry, and has been since the IEA was first created in the 1970s in response to the global oil crisis.
The slaughter of millions of birds and bats annually by US wind turbines is a case in
point, and when the impacts are
considered in the context of the minimal
energy produced via these «renewable» technologies, the damage is especially egregious.
From the article: Glenn Schleede, an
energy analysts points out that those pushing more tax dollars for energy R&D need to consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsi
energy analysts
points out that those pushing more tax dollars for
energy R&D need to consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsi
energy R&D need to
consider the fact that, from 1973 to 2012, the DOE and its predecessors spent $ 154.7 Billion (2012 $) of our tax dollars on «
Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsi
Energy R&D» * and has yet to produce a significant
energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsi
energy technology that is commercially viable (i.e., without tax breaks and / or subsidies).
Electro - mobility is
considered a major focal
point of its future
energy policy.
On two interesting asides, John P. Holdren, director of Woods Hole and one of the presenters, pulled up the statistic that in 2004, the emissions in the US from coal - electric power were more than the emissions from motor vehicles (an important
point to
consider when Bush touts coal as a renewable
energy, falsely labelling it «green» simply because it is abundant).
The
point is that such sites are even being
considered at such an early stage of renewables when non-hydro renewables constitute such a tiny portion of world
energy supply.
In the meantime, as the NY Times
points out, it may make sense to
consider individual actions, such as more
energy efficient appliances and increased vehicle efficiency, if the data shows net savings as a result of
energy independence, reduced expenditures for fossil fuel due to reduced
energy uses and potential reduction in defense expenditures as a result of reduced dependence on the middle east for oil.
I've stared from a catwalk into the green depths of a nuclear power plant's spent - fuel pool — a great vantage
point for
considering the risks and rewards of modern
energy choices.
But Sundrop has
considered that, with CEO Wayne Simmons
pointing out that several southwest states regularly thin their forests, and Sundrop has
considered transporting
energy crops by rail as a possible solution.