Sentences with phrase «point form what»

Not exact matches

As your business grew, at what point did you realize you couldn't make every decision... and was making the transition to a higher - level form of leadership difficult?
The point for me was never to tell my student that things were «fcuked», but to provide the framework and information to form their own perspectives and ideas on what they were learning and to form a dialogue about the issues.
Finally, on the planning point, even accepting that census data may be important for planning purposes, query to what extent the data contained in the long - form census is helpful in that regard.
Yet at what point during the period of this accretion disk is the Earth said to be formed?
The obvious problem of dealing with such contrasts in the linear form of narrative can be alleviated by pointing out explicitly what sorts or contrasts are being integrated, so that even if readers lose sight of the particular information involved, they can still appreciate the aesthetic transformation of elements.
Considering how it was formed, at what point during the process would you say it began to form and at what point would you say it was finished forming?
I can not claim to know exactly what each of those scientists / mathematicians believed, only that it is known they believed in some form of a higher power at some point in time.
To speak specifically on this point, the fact that form and relationship have been restored to the current image of man, both in the new metaphysics and in the sciences of man, enables us to be more understanding in our anthropology of what is being conveyed in such historically biblical notions as the Covenant and the Imago Dei.
I don't get it... we re supposed to have a seperation of church and state in our politics yet we find that our political world is constantly guided by flawed religious beliefs... now religious beliefs are creeping into the workplace, at what point would someone possibly be denied a job because a perspective employer finds out that a perspective employees religious beliefs don't follow the employers... sorry guys religion doesn; t belong in politics or the workplace in any way, shape or form.
They create fear in the lower class by saying the conservatives will do away with welfare and then say they will keep it in place and make sure that the people continue to get what they are getting now.The Conservatives point to the 47 % who are taking some form of government handout and tell their base that this should not be so in its present state, but should be reformed.
What's bad form is taking the most extreme quotes from a guy, ripping them out of any sort of context, and then using them to back your point.
It's also a Bible verse, which I thought, based on what you wrote a few lines later, is bad form to use to back up one's points.
In short, everything happens as though, in the course of its phyletic existence, every living form achieved (with more or less success) what may be called a period, or even a point, of socialization.
But psychologically this dichotomic process, whereby at each point of choice something like a new spiritual species breaks away, is influenced throughout by a final orientation which qualifies or obscurely dictates each of the earlier choices: «In what direction and in what form are we to look for this new state of being which we expect to be born of our future development?
But the fact that the form in which this treatise is clothed is what it is, is at least the result of due reflection, and at all events it is certainly correct from a psychological point of view.
At what point in this brain - replacement process would it no longer be proper to speak of the «substantial form» of the human to whom it is done?
i think the writer misses the point that many who are spiritual and not religious have explored what religions have to offer in the form of moral compass and dogma and organizations and whatnot — and have found it hard to find the peace within themselves that they innately attribute to what they seek through contact and participation in religion to begin with.
There are other scholars who defend the substantial historicity of the tomb pericope, and since we must reckon with this possibility, we now turn from the literary form of the story to its content to see in what way the latter may point to historical reliability rather than to legend.
For what point can there be in living with eyes fixed constantly and laboriously upon the future, if this future, even though it take the form of a Noosphere, must finally become a zero?
In our earlier mention of the work of Jeremias on the parables we pointed out that one of the reasons for its success is that he achieves a history of the parabolic tradition; he is able to show how the parabolic tradition reached its present form and what that tradition was like in its earlier and earliest forms.
First of all, I would like to point out what seems to me the logical conclusion of Altizer's contention that tradition must follow the movement of energy beyond every particular form, in the direction of an apocalyptic identity of opposites in which God will be all in all.
It is this essentially sacramental character of the Scriptures — the special forms of the words and sentences which give them unique power to point beyond themselves to the sources of being from which untold possibilities spring — that explains what is meant by the statement that for the believer the Bible is the Word of God.
What makes moral feelings peculiar is the logical point behind Kant's thrust — we owe dignity and respect to other persons as persons regardless of our other feelings about them, and in a moral crisis we may feel urgently the not always so gentle persuasion of God in the form of conscience.
But a strangely warmed heart was exactly what I got, and that turning point came in the form of one simple question: why not?
If man has evolved out of lower forms of life, at what point did he become man, and what is it that constituted true humanity?
«At precisely those points of urgent need... Paul is most conscious that he is writing as one authorized, by the apostolic call he had received from Jesus Christ, and in the power of the Spirit, to bring life and order to the church by his words... This is not to say that the writers of the New Testament specifically envisaged a time when their books would be collected together and form something like what we now know as the cannon.
But in these lectures I will be emphasizing, from my Christian point of view, what is wrong with contemporary education and the new form I would like to see higher education take.
Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29
My point is this: even if you don't buy it, does it matter what form the Word of God is?
What is needed, as Karl Mannheim pointed out years ago in Ideology and Utopia, is a knowledge of how to spot and deal with something which by its very nature eludes most forms of detection.
The following year, they started distributing Schaefer Beer, forming the foundation of Shore Point Distributing Co. «This is what really built the company in the»30s,»40s and»50s,» says Jim Annarella, grandson of the founder.
We can't change what happened last night, let's just get behind the team & focus on the three points we must win at Stamford Bridge, can't wait for Alexis to get back to form..
I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12
Its a pity but that's what we need form an Arsenal captain - we should've surrounded the ref when Kos went down... that would've distinctly pointed to the ref that Cost was stiring Sh!t... As for AW, he was just telling it as it was — the ref was weak... I (f everyone else can see it, why must the FA charge him (AW).
I am not having a go at him (as an off form Alexis is still better than most of our players), my point is merely that we know what to expect from the likes of Ramsey, Walcott, Ox, etc..
This is on what these two are truly arguing; Wenger uses the cup as an example against Neville but Neville isn't really belittling our ability to win games, but rather, that in the long run of a whole season it is more likely for us to drop points due to relying purely on skill which is far more linked to form then something like physicality.
But what is the point of competition when some players are guaranteed starters regardless of their form.
Until Giroud rediscovers his desire to chase down balls he should be benched, what is the point of having Theo if you don't use him when Giroud is in poor form?
Setting the right formation - I agree exactly with what you have said on this point, but it doesn't apply in any way, shape, or form to Wenger.
As for the other 10, Wenger may field any player depending on form and fitness, it's his job and he knows exactly what we require i.e 3 POINTS!
Wenger is shiit I want him out but this part of referees been human they can make mistake is what I don't like, why do players get punished if they mistakenly tackles a player with red cards are they not humans and prone to mistakes.there should be form of punishment for any ref that cost a club points by his mistakes.just like someone said they can eaaily take bribe and make mistakes knowing fully well they will not be punished.F A is crap.
What I do know, from looking at the last eight games played though, is that the two form teams in the league at the moment are Tottenham with 21 points, followed by Crystal Palace with 19 points.
- Wenger can be so insane to do it.The man is out of this world and complety insane.He can not see what it is obvious for the entire world.To have better players on the bench and to keep favouring the same out - of - form or not good enough players week after week is madness.To play for draw from the beginning against an awful team which got beaten by the entire league on a daily bases - this is something unimaginable.It is not Mertesacker fault for being embarrased by any player on the planet, it is the manager fault for exposing him as a laughing point of focus.Wenger must go, the man is deluded, he is scarred to take any risk for success.Well, guess what - only showing courage and breaking the risk can bring you success.Not the case - I predict a chain of defeats following, with the cherry on top being a big defeat against Spurs - a team which, despite our hate, plays real football (with great results I must say).
Arsenal hardly deserved the point but we got it and that is what mattered but really we should have taken even more from the game, especially with City struggling for form and confidence, so why was it so hard?
That statement obviously begs the question as to why he didn't change to this system earlier when we were going through our awful run of form, but there is no point in talking about «what ifs» after the event.
It is lucky for the Arsenal fans, Arsene Wenger and especially the Swiss international midfield star Granit Xhaka that the Gunners were in fine flowing form yesterday, because I can only imagine what the backlash would have been like had Arsenal slipped to another away defeat or even just come back from Goodison Park with only a point.
At what point a routine defeat turns into a thumping is debatable but the Hammers were well and truly beaten by a talented and in - form Liverpool side.
On the point of the defenders the stats are there i posted them about a month ago arsenal have conceded the most goal in the last 5 years of all the big four who bought Galas who bought silvestre wenger did so who is to blame when you buy on the cheap wenger is like my grandmother shopping @ a $ 10 store what do you expect form $ 10 thats rite underaverage goods.
Ipswich trial the Canaries by just the one point, but what will be of concern is the lack of form that the Tractor Boys have produced recently.
Atalanta go into the game against the Serie A Champions as the form side, not only in Serie A but across the top five leagues in Europe, undefeated in their last nine games which include eight wins and find themselves just five points off the top of Serie A in what has so far been a remarkable fairy tale season for the Bergamo side;
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z