Not exact matches
As your business grew, at
what point did you realize you couldn't make every decision... and was making the transition to a higher - level
form of leadership difficult?
The
point for me was never to tell my student that things were «fcuked», but to provide the framework and information to
form their own perspectives and ideas on
what they were learning and to
form a dialogue about the issues.
Finally, on the planning
point, even accepting that census data may be important for planning purposes, query to
what extent the data contained in the long -
form census is helpful in that regard.
Yet at
what point during the period of this accretion disk is the Earth said to be
formed?
The obvious problem of dealing with such contrasts in the linear
form of narrative can be alleviated by
pointing out explicitly
what sorts or contrasts are being integrated, so that even if readers lose sight of the particular information involved, they can still appreciate the aesthetic transformation of elements.
Considering how it was
formed, at
what point during the process would you say it began to
form and at
what point would you say it was finished
forming?
I can not claim to know exactly
what each of those scientists / mathematicians believed, only that it is known they believed in some
form of a higher power at some
point in time.
To speak specifically on this
point, the fact that
form and relationship have been restored to the current image of man, both in the new metaphysics and in the sciences of man, enables us to be more understanding in our anthropology of
what is being conveyed in such historically biblical notions as the Covenant and the Imago Dei.
I don't get it... we re supposed to have a seperation of church and state in our politics yet we find that our political world is constantly guided by flawed religious beliefs... now religious beliefs are creeping into the workplace, at
what point would someone possibly be denied a job because a perspective employer finds out that a perspective employees religious beliefs don't follow the employers... sorry guys religion doesn; t belong in politics or the workplace in any way, shape or
form.
They create fear in the lower class by saying the conservatives will do away with welfare and then say they will keep it in place and make sure that the people continue to get
what they are getting now.The Conservatives
point to the 47 % who are taking some
form of government handout and tell their base that this should not be so in its present state, but should be reformed.
What's bad
form is taking the most extreme quotes from a guy, ripping them out of any sort of context, and then using them to back your
point.
It's also a Bible verse, which I thought, based on
what you wrote a few lines later, is bad
form to use to back up one's
points.
In short, everything happens as though, in the course of its phyletic existence, every living
form achieved (with more or less success)
what may be called a period, or even a
point, of socialization.
But psychologically this dichotomic process, whereby at each
point of choice something like a new spiritual species breaks away, is influenced throughout by a final orientation which qualifies or obscurely dictates each of the earlier choices: «In
what direction and in
what form are we to look for this new state of being which we expect to be born of our future development?
But the fact that the
form in which this treatise is clothed is
what it is, is at least the result of due reflection, and at all events it is certainly correct from a psychological
point of view.
At
what point in this brain - replacement process would it no longer be proper to speak of the «substantial
form» of the human to whom it is done?
i think the writer misses the
point that many who are spiritual and not religious have explored
what religions have to offer in the
form of moral compass and dogma and organizations and whatnot — and have found it hard to find the peace within themselves that they innately attribute to
what they seek through contact and participation in religion to begin with.
There are other scholars who defend the substantial historicity of the tomb pericope, and since we must reckon with this possibility, we now turn from the literary
form of the story to its content to see in
what way the latter may
point to historical reliability rather than to legend.
For
what point can there be in living with eyes fixed constantly and laboriously upon the future, if this future, even though it take the
form of a Noosphere, must finally become a zero?
In our earlier mention of the work of Jeremias on the parables we
pointed out that one of the reasons for its success is that he achieves a history of the parabolic tradition; he is able to show how the parabolic tradition reached its present
form and
what that tradition was like in its earlier and earliest
forms.
First of all, I would like to
point out
what seems to me the logical conclusion of Altizer's contention that tradition must follow the movement of energy beyond every particular
form, in the direction of an apocalyptic identity of opposites in which God will be all in all.
It is this essentially sacramental character of the Scriptures — the special
forms of the words and sentences which give them unique power to
point beyond themselves to the sources of being from which untold possibilities spring — that explains
what is meant by the statement that for the believer the Bible is the Word of God.
What makes moral feelings peculiar is the logical
point behind Kant's thrust — we owe dignity and respect to other persons as persons regardless of our other feelings about them, and in a moral crisis we may feel urgently the not always so gentle persuasion of God in the
form of conscience.
But a strangely warmed heart was exactly
what I got, and that turning
point came in the
form of one simple question: why not?
If man has evolved out of lower
forms of life, at
what point did he become man, and
what is it that constituted true humanity?
«At precisely those
points of urgent need... Paul is most conscious that he is writing as one authorized, by the apostolic call he had received from Jesus Christ, and in the power of the Spirit, to bring life and order to the church by his words... This is not to say that the writers of the New Testament specifically envisaged a time when their books would be collected together and
form something like
what we now know as the cannon.
But in these lectures I will be emphasizing, from my Christian
point of view,
what is wrong with contemporary education and the new
form I would like to see higher education take.
Because this is the sole ideal that has the solidity once owned by Catholicism and the flexibility that this was never able to have, the only one that can always face the future and does not claim to determine it in any particular and contingent
form, the only one that can resist criticism and represent for human society the
point around which, in its frequent upheavals, in its continual oscillations, equilibrium is perpetually restored, so that when the question is heard whether liberty will enjoy
what is known as the future, the answer must be that it has something better still: it has eternity.29
My
point is this: even if you don't buy it, does it matter
what form the Word of God is?
What is needed, as Karl Mannheim
pointed out years ago in Ideology and Utopia, is a knowledge of how to spot and deal with something which by its very nature eludes most
forms of detection.
The following year, they started distributing Schaefer Beer,
forming the foundation of Shore
Point Distributing Co. «This is
what really built the company in the»30s,»40s and»50s,» says Jim Annarella, grandson of the founder.
We can't change
what happened last night, let's just get behind the team & focus on the three
points we must win at Stamford Bridge, can't wait for Alexis to get back to
form..
I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like
what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team
form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4
points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12
Its a pity but that's
what we need
form an Arsenal captain - we should've surrounded the ref when Kos went down... that would've distinctly
pointed to the ref that Cost was stiring Sh!t... As for AW, he was just telling it as it was — the ref was weak... I (f everyone else can see it, why must the FA charge him (AW).
I am not having a go at him (as an off
form Alexis is still better than most of our players), my
point is merely that we know
what to expect from the likes of Ramsey, Walcott, Ox, etc..
This is on
what these two are truly arguing; Wenger uses the cup as an example against Neville but Neville isn't really belittling our ability to win games, but rather, that in the long run of a whole season it is more likely for us to drop
points due to relying purely on skill which is far more linked to
form then something like physicality.
But
what is the
point of competition when some players are guaranteed starters regardless of their
form.
Until Giroud rediscovers his desire to chase down balls he should be benched,
what is the
point of having Theo if you don't use him when Giroud is in poor
form?
Setting the right formation - I agree exactly with
what you have said on this
point, but it doesn't apply in any way, shape, or
form to Wenger.
As for the other 10, Wenger may field any player depending on
form and fitness, it's his job and he knows exactly
what we require i.e 3
POINTS!
Wenger is shiit I want him out but this part of referees been human they can make mistake is
what I don't like, why do players get punished if they mistakenly tackles a player with red cards are they not humans and prone to mistakes.there should be
form of punishment for any ref that cost a club
points by his mistakes.just like someone said they can eaaily take bribe and make mistakes knowing fully well they will not be punished.F A is crap.
What I do know, from looking at the last eight games played though, is that the two
form teams in the league at the moment are Tottenham with 21
points, followed by Crystal Palace with 19
points.
- Wenger can be so insane to do it.The man is out of this world and complety insane.He can not see
what it is obvious for the entire world.To have better players on the bench and to keep favouring the same out - of -
form or not good enough players week after week is madness.To play for draw from the beginning against an awful team which got beaten by the entire league on a daily bases - this is something unimaginable.It is not Mertesacker fault for being embarrased by any player on the planet, it is the manager fault for exposing him as a laughing
point of focus.Wenger must go, the man is deluded, he is scarred to take any risk for success.Well, guess
what - only showing courage and breaking the risk can bring you success.Not the case - I predict a chain of defeats following, with the cherry on top being a big defeat against Spurs - a team which, despite our hate, plays real football (with great results I must say).
Arsenal hardly deserved the
point but we got it and that is
what mattered but really we should have taken even more from the game, especially with City struggling for
form and confidence, so why was it so hard?
That statement obviously begs the question as to why he didn't change to this system earlier when we were going through our awful run of
form, but there is no
point in talking about «
what ifs» after the event.
It is lucky for the Arsenal fans, Arsene Wenger and especially the Swiss international midfield star Granit Xhaka that the Gunners were in fine flowing
form yesterday, because I can only imagine
what the backlash would have been like had Arsenal slipped to another away defeat or even just come back from Goodison Park with only a
point.
At
what point a routine defeat turns into a thumping is debatable but the Hammers were well and truly beaten by a talented and in -
form Liverpool side.
On the
point of the defenders the stats are there i posted them about a month ago arsenal have conceded the most goal in the last 5 years of all the big four who bought Galas who bought silvestre wenger did so who is to blame when you buy on the cheap wenger is like my grandmother shopping @ a $ 10 store
what do you expect
form $ 10 thats rite underaverage goods.
Ipswich trial the Canaries by just the one
point, but
what will be of concern is the lack of
form that the Tractor Boys have produced recently.
Atalanta go into the game against the Serie A Champions as the
form side, not only in Serie A but across the top five leagues in Europe, undefeated in their last nine games which include eight wins and find themselves just five
points off the top of Serie A in
what has so far been a remarkable fairy tale season for the Bergamo side;