Are they really intent on proving that there is
no point in human life?
Not exact matches
Growing up middle - class, well - educated at this
point in history is pretty much the golden card of all golden cards
in the history of
human life on this planet.
Around 70 percent of people over age 65 will need long - term care at some
point in their
lives, according to the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services.
By showcasing the most witty, joyful, bullet -
pointed versions of people's
lives, and inviting constant comparisons
in which we tend to see ourselves as the losers, Facebook appears to exploit an Achilles» heel of
human nature.
His
point is that he thinks it is completely absurd theory that all 7,000,000,000
human beings on the planet are simultaneously being supervised 24 hours a day, every day of their
lives by an immortal, invisible being for the purposes of reward or punishment
in the «afterlife».
The «ephemera» of
life in global society are
points of
human contact and opportunities for sympathy.
By extension, evolving from less advanced
life forms is distasteful to those same individuals, as that necessitates a
point in evolution at which
humans are not really
humans at all
in the modern sense, which then brings up problems such as «do slugs go to heaven?»
Again, the
point at hand is valuing
human life in all its forms, from the zygote to our coffins, whether you are atheist or a theist.
My
point being that no one
human being is worth more than another or deserves more comfort
in life than any other no matter where he
lives.
I noticed you didn't tell Marcel, There is a difference between
humans and all other
living creatures on this planet... we think —
in his
point.
All
humans suffer somehow at some
point in their
lives.
One might call this natural law, or,
in good Lutheran fashion, speak of the orders of creation to
point toward the given structures of
life and the
human person.
According to our present knowledge of physics, as already
pointed out, the Second Law of Thermodynamics presents us
in the material realm with the picture of a running - down universe which will ultimately be impossible for
human life.
While economics as a descriptive study is not concerned with moral issues, the facts of economic
life inescapably
point to the moral element
in human nature.
My
point being that the possible elimination of a
human life is a risk not tolerated anywhere else
in society.
Actually global heating (climate change) will make the
point of whether these fantasy gods are whatever stupid people believe them to be a moot
point in a few years as
humans and all
living things do a slow roast as temperatures climb higher and remain there for hundreds of years....
A historian of religion takes into account authentic factors of
human life other than his historicality experienced
in given
point of time
in history.
Presuppositionalist he was, but there are two things he would
point to further: the coherence of the presuppositions
in matching the world outside of the person, and the fit between the presuppositions and the
human life as the holder
lives it.
t its most fundamental level, Christianity requires a belief that an all - knowing, all - powerful, immortal being created the entire Universe and its billions of galaxies 13,720,000,000 years ago (the age of the Universe) sat back and waited 10,000,000,000 years for the Earth to form, then waited another 3,720,000,000 years for
human beings to gradually evolve, then, at some
point gave them eternal
life and sent its son to Earth to talk about sheep and goats
in the Middle East.
«If the story of Jesus,» Kaufman remarks at one
point, «provides significant insight into and orientation for today's
human life and problems, christology can and should continue to have an important place
in our theological reflection and our religious devotion; if not, it should be allowed to fall away.
The above summary suggests that a large part of the motivation that Paul reveals
in his narrative up to this
point centers
in his repudiation of his former way of
life.26 The opposition between his old
life and the new is patterned after the opposition between
human and divine authority seen
in vv.
The eschatological elements of the salvation history theme have implied that the fullness of
life lies only
in the future; consequently, American churches have often responded to
human suffering
in the present by
pointing the sufferer to God's future.
In the totality of Jesus» human life, obedient to the will of God even to the point of death, there is the enactment, on the stage of history and in the circumstances of human existence, of the right relationship of that existence with Go
In the totality of Jesus»
human life, obedient to the will of God even to the
point of death, there is the enactment, on the stage of history and
in the circumstances of human existence, of the right relationship of that existence with Go
in the circumstances of
human existence, of the right relationship of that existence with God.
The central
point of the preceding criticisms is that it is not possible to understand
human violence without acknowledging that
human beings are addressed by the Word of God, and
live their
lives in reaction to this Word.
Unless the discussion
in the preceding pages has entirely failed to make its
point, it will be plain that what is being proposed
in this book is (as I have said) a «de-mythologizing» of the inherited notions of «
life after death», with their (to many of us) impossible assertions; and also the «re-mythologizing» — or better, the re-conceiving — of their implicit intention so that we may have a valid way of affirming the value and worth of
human existence, its significance and importance for God, and its preservation
in God as a reality which has affected the divine
life and
in God has acquired an enduring quality which nothing can take away.
This last
point is particularly important because
in the Psalms, God gives us permission to feel all that we experience as
human beings
living in a broken world, and he invites us to vocalize those feeling to him.
There have been many other theories of atonement, each picking out what a given generation took to be the worst possible
human situation and going on to affirm that
in the action of God
in Jesus, God met us precisely at that
point: slavery to demonic powers, from which we have been delivered; actual slavery to
human masters, with manumission accomplished
in Christ; guilt for wrongdoing, with Christ as the advocate who pleads for, and secures, our release; corruptibility and mortal death, met
in Christ with healing and eternal
life....
God's receiving the world's achievements into his own everlasting
life; God's remembering for ever that which is thus received; God's using for further good the achievements which have taken place
in the created order — here are
points which need to be emphasized when we begin to think of the worth or value of
human existence.
A possible real connection with the animal kingdom is itself of relatively little theological importance, for anything
in it that would be important for the theological interpretation of
human life in the present, can also be known without it, that is to say, the vulnerability of man
in face of the powers of this earth, man's temptation to see himself from the
point of view of his animality, his liability to death, man's dynamic orientation and task of developing to his perfection from below upwards, beyond his beginnings.
At this
point it is sufficient to say that for the moment we recognize that we are not what we might be, that
human existence is
in defection from its proper fulfillment, and that we are
in need of the wholeness of
life which will put us on the right path and enable us to become more and more what God intends for us to be.
This chapter deals with religion as a particular facet of education
in a democracy, but more significant is the fact that all of the preceding chapters set forth a religious
point of view by demonstrating what the
life of ultimate devotion means
in a wide range of
human concerns.
There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed
in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly
human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh,
living a
human life under the same
human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one
in whom God energizes
in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity;
in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure
human wholeness of
life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only
lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the
point of talk about atonement wrought
in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all;
in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality
in the
life of God and effective among humankind.
As
pointed out above, a potentiality of mind must have been present
in all ancestors of the
human species, down to the primordial
life.
We are
living at the turning
point of turning
points in our
human history.
But on the other hand, when
in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that
in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain
point, and yet the whole
life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware
in what an infinitely deeper sense a
human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness
in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.
The biblical history is meaningful because it is related at every
point to the fundamental reality which lies behind all history and all
human experience, which is, the
living God
in His Kingdom; and because it moves towards a climax
in which the Kingdom of God came upon men with conclusive effect.
When Paul Lehmann
in an often quoted sentence said that «God's purpose for
human life is to make it and keep it
human» he was putting the
point in an admirable fashion — which helps to make contemporary people grasp both their high dignity as
humans and their defection from that possibility.
What I have particularly
in mind is that while there is much talk about taking Jesus as a key to the interpretation of
human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of
human life, or to the
point of man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature;
in other words the cosmos
in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.
(Crandall does not address the
point, but it is difficult to see that bringing a doctor
in for consultation would change the nature of the decision about taking
human life.)
It is true that at one
point it speaks of the sanctity of
life pertaining to «
human beings
in any and every state of consciousness or self - awareness.»
When you look at Psalm 104 it makes the
point that God has packed the earth with as much
life as possible, as diverse as possible for as long as possible,
in order that we
humans could be enriched with a huge treasure chest of bio deposits.
As scholars such as Randall Stewart and Mark Van Doren
pointed out nearly a half - century ago, Hawthorne disbelieved
in the secular, progressive optimism of the nineteenth century because,
in his own words, the progressive spirit «preposterously miscalculated the possibilities» of
human life.
For as regards infra -
human living things, even on the suppositions already mentioned, the question is probably still open, or has not yet been sufficiently subjected to examination, whether the
living substantial formal principle of what
in the metaphysical sense would be a real species (biological category, etc.), is multiplied with the individuals of the species (biological group, etc.), or is one and the same principle which, unfolding its formative power at various material
points in space and time, manifests itself more than once
in space and time.
The chief
points of change are, first, that the scene has been transferred from the supernatural world of the gods to the earthly sphere of
human history; secondly, that It is not a god who experiences the renewal of
life (for the God of Israel is not himself subject to death and resurrection, but on the contrary initiates and controls these events) but the people of Israel, who look
in hope for restoration when their existence is threatened; and thirdly, that this hope is expressed as a metaphor describing the historical future, rather than as a myth of cosmic renewal.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my
point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not
in need of any partners but we the creation is
in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we
human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the
life of others, drug dealing,
human trafficking, believing
in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details
in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
(1) Justification
points to the source of motive and morale for ethical
living amidst the sinfulness of the
human situation; it permits the Christian to participate
in struggles for justice without making the struggle the norm.
Thus the issues which are being debated anew
in the theological turmoil today center
in the meaning of Christian love as it
points on the one side to the possibilities of
human existence, and as it
points on the other side to a fulfillment of this
life in an ultimate good which transcends the possibilities of this world.
Without
in any way wishing to ignore what has been called the «tragic sense of
life», let us at this
point affirm the positive values of
human existence, finite though it is.
And now you've finally come to the area of disconnect, where you will make the assertion that as soon as fertilization occurs, it's a
human life, and people
point out the flaw
in that.
As it was
pointed out by Olof Klohr of Jena, «The atheism of Marxism is,
in essence, not the «No» to religion and God, but the «Yes» to the world, the «Yes» to the conscious formation of
human life.