Sentences with phrase «point in mind as»

Just remember to keep these three important points in mind as you set your intention:

In short, a book trailer should be part of your marketing plan, because it can help with discoverability, but you should keep these four points in mind as you create the video.

«Keep these points in mind as you search for your internship: Large companies begin intern recruiting and hiring early.

But keep these points in mind as you evaluate Internet fax service providers:

Not exact matches

Always have the endgame in mind as you plot your strategy, and be prepared at some point to split the remaining difference.

No one wants to see employees covering up their essential beliefs or wasting time hiding harmless bits of weirdness, but as Jarrett points out, quoting Shakespeare, it is worth keeping in mind that «all the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players.»

And as Kareem Adbul - Jabbar pointed out in a July piece in Time, «In our disillusioned mind, «home» becomes a romanticized symbol of our innocence, in which we dreamed limitlessly and were loved unconditionallin a July piece in Time, «In our disillusioned mind, «home» becomes a romanticized symbol of our innocence, in which we dreamed limitlessly and were loved unconditionallin Time, «In our disillusioned mind, «home» becomes a romanticized symbol of our innocence, in which we dreamed limitlessly and were loved unconditionallIn our disillusioned mind, «home» becomes a romanticized symbol of our innocence, in which we dreamed limitlessly and were loved unconditionallin which we dreamed limitlessly and were loved unconditionally.

Keep all those considerations in mind if you're planning a trip and think Zika could at some point be a concern for you, such as if you're trying to become pregnant or are taking a babymoon to a destination where Zika could soon spread.

Also keep in mind, as Hamilton points out, «the most well - known benefit to forming an LLC (versus doing business as a sole proprietorship) is that an LLC provides for separation between personal assets and company assets, and this allows for some legal protection.»

In addition to the lighting devices that immediately come to mind in the wake of a power outage and the tools highlighted in «Island Without Power,» Arteaga also pointed to glucose monitoring devices for diabetics, hearing aids and blood pressure monitors as a few other critical devices that needed power to functioIn addition to the lighting devices that immediately come to mind in the wake of a power outage and the tools highlighted in «Island Without Power,» Arteaga also pointed to glucose monitoring devices for diabetics, hearing aids and blood pressure monitors as a few other critical devices that needed power to functioin the wake of a power outage and the tools highlighted in «Island Without Power,» Arteaga also pointed to glucose monitoring devices for diabetics, hearing aids and blood pressure monitors as a few other critical devices that needed power to functioin «Island Without Power,» Arteaga also pointed to glucose monitoring devices for diabetics, hearing aids and blood pressure monitors as a few other critical devices that needed power to function.

Even better, have some specific conversion in mind, as what's the point of all this traffic if you have no real business - driving conversions?

And this point dovetails with the other point as far as since we don't pretend to know the precise timing of when bubbles kind of unwind or when the busts will finally reach a bottom, the idea is that we can actually be in the right quartile of activity, in other words I never try to catch the very top of a bubble, I don't try to ride things to the very end, and similarly I don't mind catching falling knifes.

My point is you are expecting the «LAST» major acknowledged religion in the world to be just as «like minded» today as Christianity.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

As the story unfolds, it is worth keeping in mind several points generally overlooked in the media coverage.

As much as christians spew on about how the mormons are not real christians, they fail to understand that the Book of Mormon still takes on its roots from the same bible they foolishly believe in... nothing like hypocrites to enlighten the mind and prove our point furtheAs much as christians spew on about how the mormons are not real christians, they fail to understand that the Book of Mormon still takes on its roots from the same bible they foolishly believe in... nothing like hypocrites to enlighten the mind and prove our point furtheas christians spew on about how the mormons are not real christians, they fail to understand that the Book of Mormon still takes on its roots from the same bible they foolishly believe in... nothing like hypocrites to enlighten the mind and prove our point further.

If reason tells us that «John 1800» engraved into a rock must have an intelligent mind as its source, should not also the infinitely more complex and meaningful information found in our DNA point toward a Supreme Designer that gave us life as well as creating all the universe?

As G.K. Chesterton pointed out in his book, Orthodoxy: «Merely having an open mind is nothing.

Just as a point of clarification to Bill's post above, while I welcome what I thinkis a imporant point we should al keep in mind I would in no way ever see myself as an important part of the conversation more a present somewhat comenting bystander although my ego was very flattered when I read Bill's comment

Science doesn't disprove God, in fact it points to God as the Mind behind the cosmos.

The New Testament: A Translation by david bentley hart yale, 616 pages, $ 35 David Bentley Hart's new single - handed translation of the New Testament will strike the fair - minded reader by turns as startling, incisive, audacious, smug, shrewd, and quirky to the point of exasperation: everything, in....

Julie, as you correctly point out, has offered support for her claims, and the principle figures in this mess have answered with nothing more than outright dismissal and disdain for her, and that — at least to my mind — gives the lie to their protestations of innocence, whether before the fact or after.

Little by little, though the irresistible development of those yearnings you implanted in me as a child, through the influence of gifted friends who entered my life at certain moments to bring light and strength to my mind, and through the awakenings of spirit I owe to the successive initiations, gentle and terrible, which you caused me to undergo: through all these I have been brought to the point where I can no longer see anything, nor any longer breathe, outside that milieu in which all is made one.

His point was that human language could convey knowledge of God, which meant that any form of revelation communicated the truth as it existed objectively first in God's mind and then in the structures of the world.

Keep in mind that as I reply, I can't possibly say everything I need on the subject, but here goes my attempt at a couple of key points:

In fact I was incredibly interested as to why she changed her mind because I thought she might have a point.

We speak not as supplying His name; but for want, we use good names, in order that the mind may have these as points of support, so as not to err in other respects.

However, there is a certain point when time ends and all men have finally decided either to love God or reject him, when every knee will bow either because of love or because they are forced, that eternal suffering as a sentence on mankind is questionable in my mind.

The notion of an empirical fact, however, as pointing to the present alone, is an abstraction, existing only in the mind or to common sense, for all things in time can not be thought of apart from their futures.

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

In thus arguing, Hartshorne omits the main point, which is that if one mind is part of another, then the former must be included as it is, with all its actively erroneous beliefs.

In many ways this point calls to mind Descartes» criterion of clarity and distinctness of ideas as the measure of their certainty, as well as Hume's «force and vivacity» of simple impressions which enables us to distinguish present perception from memory.

Chicago philosopher - comic Aaron Freeman made the same point in a recent National Public Radio commentary: «Gratitude ameliorates the worst aspect of American life, which is that the consumer culture makes us constantly aware of what we do not have, without counterbalancing rituals of gratitude for the mind - boggling bounty that is the U.S.A.... As you are grateful, to that precise extent you are happy.»

We had the first baptism of slave converts in the Velloor school; between fifty and sixty were present, and (from) the numerous candidates for baptism nineteen were admitted into the visible Church of Christ... Their hearty responses and decided, brief and pointed answers as to motives... -LCB- and -RCB- strictly consistent Christian conduct for many months past,... left no doubts on our minds that many of these, I hope all, were already members of the invisible Church of Christ.36

At one point as we dwell in the past we might find a point in our evolution where something put us on the path of where we are today or created us out of nowhere but until then creationism is simply a dream wished up by those who refuse to be more open minded about the universe we live in.

At some point in the next five to ten years the Supreme Court is likely to rule that pollution of our children's minds is as dangerous as pollution of the air, land and water.

As I have quoted on other occasions and in other writing, St. Thomas Aquinas made the point with his usual precision in an incidental remark — provided perhaps that we change his word «soul» to the word «mind» Aquinas said, «In his «rule» God stands in relation to the whole universe as the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquAs I have quoted on other occasions and in other writing, St. Thomas Aquinas made the point with his usual precision in an incidental remark — provided perhaps that we change his word «soul» to the word «mind» Aquinas said, «In his «rule» God stands in relation to the whole universe as the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquin other writing, St. Thomas Aquinas made the point with his usual precision in an incidental remark — provided perhaps that we change his word «soul» to the word «mind» Aquinas said, «In his «rule» God stands in relation to the whole universe as the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquin an incidental remark — provided perhaps that we change his word «soul» to the word «mind» Aquinas said, «In his «rule» God stands in relation to the whole universe as the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquIn his «rule» God stands in relation to the whole universe as the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquin relation to the whole universe as the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquas the soul stands in relation to the body.&raquin relation to the body.»

For example, in Europe we point especially to the French Revolution and its aftermath as showing the consequences of pursuing equality in too single - minded a way.

Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 345 - 346 and 435 imply clearly that (b) is the alternative Whitehead had in mind, for in each passage he presents a situation where a given occasion, X, inherits from another occasion, Y, in its past, which in turn inherits from Z, which is in its past — the point of each passage is to say that X inherits doubly from Z, both immediately and as mediated by Y. Z is not in the immediate past of X, and yet X is exhibited as prehending Z directly.

Much more recently Eldridge Cleaver has pointed out that the splitting tendency in American culture, which we have traced back to the early Puritans, tended to make the white man a mind without a body and the black man a body without a mind.20 Only when the white man comes to respect his own body, to accept it as part of himself, will he be able to accept the black man's mind and treat him as something other than the living symbol of what he has rejected in himself.

A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!

As pointed out above, a potentiality of mind must have been present in all ancestors of the human species, down to the primordial life.

But even regarding this law, one's starting point should be to spell out whether he has in mind the version of Aquinas or Suarez or perhaps some contemporary theorist such as Grisez or Finnis, because the versions differ.

well just thinking about these wars in the muslim / mid-east world over religious differences (which may reflect mental states in many ways) in a world where most realize that living in the present moment is best way to happiness and being in the moment in non-strife and awareness through the teachings of masters such as found in the buddhist, taoist, zen, etc., etc., etc. spriritually based practices of religious like thought and teachings, etc. that to ask these scientifically educated populace whom have access to vast amounts of knowledges and understandings on the internet, etc. to believe in past beliefs that perhaps gave basis and inspiration to that which followed — but is not the end all of all times or knowledges — and is thus — non self - sustaining in a belief that does not encompass growth of knowledge and understanding of all truths and being as it is or could be — is to not respect the intelligence and minds and personage of even themselves — not to be disrespected nor disrespectful in any way — only to point out that perhaps too much is asked to put others into the cloak of blind faith and adherance to the past that disregards the realities of the present and the potential of the future... so you try to live in the past — and destroy your present and your future — where is the intelligence in that — and why do people continually fear monger or allow to be fear — mongered into this destructive vision of the future based upon the past?

What I have particularly in mind is that while there is much talk about taking Jesus as a key to the interpretation of human nature, as it is often phrased, or to the meaning of human life, or to the point of man's existential situation, there is a lamentable tendency to stop there and not to go on to talk about «the world» — by which Miss Emmet meant, I assume, the totality of things including physical nature; in other words the cosmos in its basic structure and its chief dynamic energy.

Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz

O'Malley is especially single - minded in eschewing the use of terminology such as «liberal» or «conservative», making the valid point that such broad groupings were not easily identifiable at the time and were often marked by a certain fluidity in connection with particular issues.

He amusingly quotes an unnamed liberal - minded Catholic bishop who objected to the use of the word «bounty» in new liturgical translations (he could equally have used paschal or consubstantial) as a case in point.

Let me digress for a moment from the main course of the discussion to observe that this last point must be kept in mind as an answer to a possible objection to Peirce's account.

Don't get back to the point where your mind splits off from your body as happened in real time.