In fact, as with all prisoners serving a fixed - term sentence, Mr Patterson was due for automatic release at the halfway
point in his sentence, ie at the end of seven and a half months.
Instead, write your bullet
points in sentence fragments e.g. «Successfully led a team of six to complete project X ahead of schedule» or «Proficient with Microsoft Word, Excel, and Outlook».
Not exact matches
Before you do any planning, try to summarize the
point of the meeting
in one
sentence.
As a matter of fact, there is no
point in denying that by all means clichés surely increase the number of words
in the text, which is clearly seen
in this
sentence.
It continues,
in bullet -
pointed sentences: «Try to change your location as soon as possible and don't tell anyone about your location.
In defending his record, Sessions is likely to point to his vote to confirm Eric Holder as the country's first black attorney general and to his co-sponsorship of the Fair Sentencing Act, which sought to reduce racial disparities in how black and white drug offenders are treate
In defending his record, Sessions is likely to
point to his vote to confirm Eric Holder as the country's first black attorney general and to his co-sponsorship of the Fair
Sentencing Act, which sought to reduce racial disparities
in how black and white drug offenders are treate
in how black and white drug offenders are treated.
After devoting a solid 15 pages of his letter on how the U.S. should slash regulations, Dimon made a
point to single out a single area of government oversight that has undeniable value: «Some regulations quite clearly create a common good (e.g., clean air and water),» Dimon noted,
in a
sentence that went on to catalog the ways regulation is otherwise bad for the economy — making it all the more striking that he chose to highlight environmental issues.
Armstrong wanted to illustrate his
point that AOL had been hit hard with changes
in insurance requirements, and he could have done this by ending after the first
sentence.
Strategists
pointed to the addition of the word «some»
in a
sentence where the Fed described the further improvement it would like to see
in labor and inflation before raising rates.
Instead of jumping straight into a conversation, or snoozing through bullet -
pointed sentence fragments
in a slideshow presentation, he requires his senior executives to write six - page narrative memos.
Defense attorneys
pointed to Tamerlan's relationship with his wife to demonstrate his ability to influence his younger brother Dzhokhar, as they began their case Monday
in the
sentencing phase of Dzhokhar's trial.
He
pointed to a
sentence later
in the same paragraph that says, «if a broadband provider degraded the delivery of a particular application (e.g., a disfavored VoIP service) or class of application (e.g., all VoIP applications), it would violate the bright - line no - throttling rule.»
In short, we can summarize my point and John's point in two sentences: Mr. Bogle breaks down the total return of stocks to multiple expansion & earnings growt
In short, we can summarize my
point and John's
point in two sentences: Mr. Bogle breaks down the total return of stocks to multiple expansion & earnings growt
in two
sentences: Mr. Bogle breaks down the total return of stocks to multiple expansion & earnings growth.
Kayne recognizes
in these
sentences a
point made Howard Marks: «The biggest investing errors come not from factors that are informational or analytical, but from those that are psychological.»
Hmmm, you'll have to
point out where I ridiculed this girl
in the two
sentences I wrote earlier.
This
point is demonstrated
in the death
sentence pronounced on the White Rose member, Christoph Probst, by the infamous Nazi judge, Roland Freisler, who said, «He is a «nonpolitical man» — hence no man at all!»
Jn 13:34 At least you get the second half of your
sentence right when you say «I take it that they
point to Jesus and what His work looks like
in my life.»
The
sentences were grammatically correct,
in a way, but never formed a coherent argument or
point.
For
in the very first
sentence of the text it is manifest that the focal
point of the chapter is not entity
in general, but that primary entity that Aristotle called ouisa and Whitehead called «actual entity.»
However, there is a certain
point when time ends and all men have finally decided either to love God or reject him, when every knee will bow either because of love or because they are forced, that eternal suffering as a
sentence on mankind is questionable
in my mind.
But the
point of the quotation, for our present purpose, is found
in the first
sentence.
Furthermore, a core
point in the second
sentence can be restated as follows: what is forbidden is the division of the basic region.
Each biblical statement is a
sentence which must be understood
in terms of the vocabulary and grammar of its original language (Hebrew, Aramaic or Greek), but the better modern translations, such as the Revised Standard Version, have made it possible for one who understands English vocabulary and grammar to read and study the Bible without being seriously misled on most
points.
The impossibility of stamping «determinate
sentencing» as good or bad
in any given political climate
points up the fact that reform measures ultimately depend on an informed, caring and articulate minority of citizens who can influence public opinion.
What I already knew notionally I saw with my own eyes: that up to half of the young nonwhite men
in the area surrounding the jail would at some
point pass through this correctional institution, mostly for minor offenses, with the upper limit a 30 - month
sentence.
Before considering these three
points I will state, as fairly as I can
in a few
sentences, what seem to be the most common reasons for questioning the survivability of liberal Protestantism.
Matthew reports next (5:16) a
sentence of exhortation, which
points the moral of the saying about salt and light: «Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is
in heaven.»
When Paul Lehmann
in an often quoted
sentence said that «God's purpose for human life is to make it and keep it human» he was putting the
point in an admirable fashion — which helps to make contemporary people grasp both their high dignity as humans and their defection from that possibility.
Sentence two is the closest to an actual argument he makes, but it is a fact that science has little to no information on what happens after we die, as you
pointed out yourself, we do not know (
in the sense of having empirical proof).
Thus, Hartshorne's semantics for the modal operators
in the ontological argument is constructed along the lines of a de re modality of temporal becoming rather than a de dicto modality of sets of consistent
sentences — Goodwin (1978) is admirably clear on this
point in his book.
To put the
point in the blunt terms employed by Justice Harold Blackmun toward the end of his career on the bench, when he announced that he would henceforth vote (as Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall had previously done) to overturn all death
sentences, when I sit on a Court that reviews and affirms capital convictions, I am part of «the machinery of death.»
But Americans are curiously unwilling to learn from Europe, even though almost all member - states of the European Union have better policies and lower rates of addiction than the U.S.. On other
points, Massing is
in agreement with the harm - reduction approach: he favors free needles, methadone treatment, decriminalization of marijuana and repeal of mandatory
sentencing.
I did not mean to imply that pacifists of the messianic community have consciously built upon liberal — humanistic pacifism (though my
sentence can be so read — mea culpa), but only to
point out what should be obvious to all: that the inroads pacifists of the messianic community have made
in Roman Catholic and Protestant mainline circles can be traced to a prior acceptance of liberal — humanistic pacifism by many
in those circles.
Congratulations Rob, you completely missed my
point, had by my count eight misspellings
in four
sentences, and were almost completely incoherent — all
in one post!
Its main
point, which comes only two
sentences from the end, is expressed this way: «To those to whom truth has been revealed, who continue
in the tradition of the Holy One's followers, the call is not only to offer words of praise, confessing that Jesus is Christ the Lord, but to offer our lives as the instruments of this Lord of peace and justice.»
I'm sorry but from that
point your
sentence and meaning has lost its origin, I can not be
in your mind trying to find out what you mean within the meandering ways you currently ascribe to when using the English Language
The thing is, Black Six, that while your overall
point is good, the last
sentence implies an incorrect assumption, which is what the other posters are critiquing,
In other words, you have a
point, but so do they, and it's not idiotic.
As Eduard Schweizer correctly
points out, the main verb
in that
sentence, to which all else is subordinate, is make.
Martin Dibelius
points out that many of the
sentences of Jesus have parallels
in the sayings of Jewish literature.
Mingana
points out that Cosmas» text is important not only as regards the existence of Christian communities
in Bombay, Malabar and Ceylon, but also and «especially by the addition of the significant
sentence: among the rest of the Indians.»
From a more abstract
point of view, as we have seen, Aquinas puts out a very stringent criticism, sober and terse, though it is
in the final
sentence on the subject.
There are two
points in that brief
sentence, and the failure of the medieval Church to observe them or to reform its practice
in conformity with them, is highly typical of the general failure to reform itself, with which Luther was so radically concerned.
Coghlan thrived with the Cubs after a miserable showing
in Oakland, and while his defense at third was shaky
in a limited trial, I can't think of a way to end this
sentence that would support my
point.
After all, the Tulane
point - shaving allegations were never proved
in court, and when the NCAA
sentenced SMU football to a one - year death penalty
in 1987 (the school voluntarily added a second year), it was primarily for flagrant and recurrent violations committed by boosters.
(And Carter Capps is mentioned
in that
sentence after the
point at which you placed the ellipses above.)
I think it was on BE that someone once
pointed out how important a couple of commas and a capital letter could be
in a
sentence like: «I helped my uncle, Jack, off the horse.»
No
point in posting a
sentence in there with no substance or even a reason to back it up... open up a debate instead of just critising...
Reading this
sentence alone could be unremarkable for some, but it could be loaded for those who are trying to conceive, those who have experienced pregnancy / infant / child loss, or anyone at any
point in his or her own parenthood journey for any number of reasons.
The crucial
point is that any act, which reduced the
sentencing for, say, possession of marijuana would have to explicitly state that it is being applied retroactively
in order to automatically release people from prison (a physical and administrative act that, itself, may take a while).
I can see the government
point of view though (and that of Stuart above)
in that it will exclude prisoners with long
sentences - the murderers etc..