Sentences with phrase «point of discussion in»

This is a great point of discussion in a law personal statement, in interviews and generally, it successfully shows your interest in the field.

This has been a point of discussion in the community since the gameplay reveal event.

The concept of playing classical music for babies in the womb to increase their intelligence has been a regular point of discussion in recent years.

(Again false as just illustrated above and again attacking me personally rather than my argument) None of these have anything to do with the point of discussion in this thread.

The whole point of our discussion in these pages has been to urge that we do indeed put our hope in God; it is God and God alone, who is our hope, not that which we expect to receive or to have been guaranteed.

Such situation, its reasons and causes, protection measures may be basic points of discussion in domestic violence cause / effect essays.

Not exact matches

He's careful to note that any discussion of Apple releasing an actual TV set remains «sort of conjectural at this point in time.

But the point is the discussion of these cultural threads and getting past the race / religion overtones in our thinking isn't easy.

In that notebook is a list of discussion points and action items.

The most explosive point in the discussion came when Ramos would not embrace legislation to toughen penalties on people who cross into the US illegally after being convicted of an aggravated felony.

In a heated discussion on Reddit this week, social engineer Chris Hadnagy, who tests the network security of companies using tactics such as phishing and keylogging scams, shared his tips on cybersecurity from a hacker's point of view.

He was able to keep the discussion largely on the topics he likes to focus on, and he made a number of points that will resonate with progressives, not a small voting group in New York.

What it's about: «Sargeant York» may have been about World War I — a sharpshooter becomes an unexpected hero after attacking and capturing a German position using the same strategy as turkey hunting — but the American - proud movie became a point of major discussion in the United States over the merits of entering World War II.

According to the LA Times, one of the sticking points in the discussions between Dauman and the Redstones is whether Viacom will decide to sell a stake in its Paramount movie studio.

She noted that with the $ 15 minimum wage (a frequent point of comparison in the discussion) Safeway chose to absorb the cost of the minimum wage instead of cutting jobs or passing the costs on to consumers, but that made Seattle Safeway stores» profit margin half as much as stores in other locations.

At another point, he was asked about the Cambridge University Psychometrics Centre — which he said had initially been involved in discussions between him and SCL to be part of the project but fell out of the arrangement.

Trump's tweet came hours after his top economic adviser Larry Kudlow told reporters the US is «in the pre-preliminary stages of any discussions» with TPP countries about rejoining the pact, and that the prospect of reentry was more a «thought» than a «policy» at this point.

contains an analytical discussion of duration and its importance, but the simple point here is that the longer the duration of an investment, the longer the investment horizon a passive investor requires in order to expect a reasonably predictable long - term return.

In a press release by PETA, the animal rights group noted that in discussions with Tesla, PETA pointed out the possibility for the electric car company to reduce its carbon footprint through the usage of vegan leatheIn a press release by PETA, the animal rights group noted that in discussions with Tesla, PETA pointed out the possibility for the electric car company to reduce its carbon footprint through the usage of vegan leathein discussions with Tesla, PETA pointed out the possibility for the electric car company to reduce its carbon footprint through the usage of vegan leather.

A further sticking point in discussions is the length of time that the U.S. government wants to impose conditions on what AT&T can and can not do after a deal.

I'm wondering from an economic point of view, when you look at the United States and your discussions with other people in business and in government, is his bark bigger than his bite?

This immediately highlights a very important point almost always neglected in most discussions of international trade.

I simply hope this short post can facilitate discussion, or someone could recommend point to further reading that addresses my perceived shortcomings in balance of payment analysis.

This is not a discussion of whether Bitcoin is fraudulent or not, this comes down to a discussion of whether collectively as individuals at this point in history we want to put our faith in a currency backed by a centralized system or decentralized system.

A whole discussion can be had about the effect of the Bitcoin network and value on the interest and price of alternative cryptocurrencies, but the point is that for the purpose of privacy it can be relatively easy and cheap to move into Monero and back out in Bitcoin, or at some exchanges, directly into cash.

Politico's Nicholas Vinocur reports, «During their discussions, an aide said that Macron had pressed the point that «we can not conceive of a trade war among allies,» and that France would only speak «in concert with Europe» on trade.

P.s., Understanding the previous discussion of the restaurant microeconomics depends on the reader understanding these points which I raised in my post on Michael Porter (his quotes are in bold and mine are in plain text as is usual):

In the 1960s to 2000, the starting point of every discussion was, are we having inflation?

This raises a key point of discussion for the digital currency community: should Bitcoin protect its «brand,» or is reputation damage an unavoidable risk in the decentralized landscape?

Contrary to Buffet's opinion, Bill Gates acknowledged the value of cryptocurrencies and shared it in one of his discussions with Reddit users in January 2015, saying: «Digital currencies can help the poor, but not Bitcoin» pointing at two important Bitcoin drawbacks, namely its volatility and anonymity.

To discover what a prospective customer's pain points might be, use your understanding of the common pain points that your existing customers already have and frame the discussion in a way that allows for the prospective to customer to either agree or disagree that they have these problems.

When in the 1970s there began to be much discussion about «mediating structures» and voluntarism, when Ronald Reagan urged us to rely on government less and on ourselves more, when George Bush talked about a «thousand points of light,» those of a statist mind - set groused that it was all a scheme to cut back on government social services.

The point about trading (even in corpses — which connects this discussion to the one we've been having about how to treat the newly dead) is even more profound and points, of course, to a conclusion about what a completely commercial, ruggedly libertarian society would really be like.

One large diagram might be presented at an early point in the discussion of fossils.

I'm also going to add this; in earlier comments you raised some legitimate points for discussion about how the British Mandate was apportioned, which is a huge part of the whole quagmire and the legality of it all is a huge, tangled, convoluted mess.

@just sayin — In this discussion, you are coming from the point of view that there is a God.

And, now that I've said that, I will point out that this has absolutely nothing to do with the abortion question, and is merely a de-railment of the discussion of a woman's right to decide what takes place in her body.

It would probably overstate the point only minimally to say that SZ in its entirety is an extended meditation on Kierkegaard s discussion of time and eternity in that treatise (CD 73 - 83).

, avoids discussion of many moral sticking points of the next few millennia (even though he knew in advance they'd be sticking points and could have provided clearer guidance), and then makes one of the central points of the entire story — and his entire reason for being here really — a personal sacrifice that is so va.gue that no one can even explain how or what was, in fact, sacrificed.

I won't go into a detailed discussion of this here but I'll just point out that Paul asked in Romans 6 «How can we who died to sin still live in it?

In biological discussion when a few speculative biologists point to the necessity of an «epigenetic landscape» to make sense of embryogenesis, development and growth their colleagues usually summon them back to «reality» with sober accusations of mystification.

In view of the importance we attached to our discussion of the Son of man concept in ancient Jewish apocalyptic, above, we would like to point out that Colpe accepts the German contention that such a concept is to be found, but finds that the existing sources (Daniel, I Enoch, IV Ezra 13) are inadequate to present it to uIn view of the importance we attached to our discussion of the Son of man concept in ancient Jewish apocalyptic, above, we would like to point out that Colpe accepts the German contention that such a concept is to be found, but finds that the existing sources (Daniel, I Enoch, IV Ezra 13) are inadequate to present it to uin ancient Jewish apocalyptic, above, we would like to point out that Colpe accepts the German contention that such a concept is to be found, but finds that the existing sources (Daniel, I Enoch, IV Ezra 13) are inadequate to present it to us.

I greatly welcome this turn in the discussion, for this latter question was also the theme of my own sermon, and it was only because the former arose in «Meeting Point» and was seized upon by many of my correspondents that I have had to devote a disproportionate amount of space to the historical problem.

For instance, when in the course of discussion it is clear that the one receiving such admonishment actually disagrees with the point being made, then continued dogging attempts to force the other party to change does indeed become «manipulative coercion».

I agree with Gary's point: «when in the course of discussion it is clear that the one receiving such admonishment actually disagrees with the point being made, then continued dogging attempts to force the other party to change does indeed become «manipulative coercion.»»

The point of this whole discussion, as far as I'm concerned, is that we are ALL selective in our interpretation and application of Scripture.

In the evening of the same day this sermon was the subject of a discussion in the B.B.C.'s program, «Meeting Point», in which I was questioned by some members of the morning congregation under the chairmanship of Canon W. E. Purcell, editor of this Dialogue, and at that time the Religious Broadcasting Organizer for the Midland Region of the B.B.CIn the evening of the same day this sermon was the subject of a discussion in the B.B.C.'s program, «Meeting Point», in which I was questioned by some members of the morning congregation under the chairmanship of Canon W. E. Purcell, editor of this Dialogue, and at that time the Religious Broadcasting Organizer for the Midland Region of the B.B.Cin the B.B.C.'s program, «Meeting Point», in which I was questioned by some members of the morning congregation under the chairmanship of Canon W. E. Purcell, editor of this Dialogue, and at that time the Religious Broadcasting Organizer for the Midland Region of the B.B.Cin which I was questioned by some members of the morning congregation under the chairmanship of Canon W. E. Purcell, editor of this Dialogue, and at that time the Religious Broadcasting Organizer for the Midland Region of the B.B.C..

This is all a remarkable discussion, but regardless of the point in your comments, please consider that Christian Science is entirely opposed to blind faith.

Incidentally, I find that this is a common defense of preachers who apparently are so vulnerable in their preaching that they can not accept critical comments or even honest discussion that represents another point of view.

This point has been stressed in the energetic discussion of the saying that has gone on within the «Bultmann school».