Sentences with phrase «point of his attack in»

Versatile DBs who can cover different kinds of receivers are everything, the equivalent of the classic middle linebacker in yesteryear, when it was all about hitting the point of attack in the run game.

Ronald Koeman's side lost Lukaku to Manchester United in a # 75m deal over the summer, and according to The Sun, the manager wants King to be the focal point of his attack in the second half of the season.

These unique hubs might represent key points of attack in cancer therapies, says Croce.

The fact that McGregor has eight points of attack in MMA means he can get away with sparingly using his right hand, against Mayweather he's only got two points of attack.

Not exact matches

The women point out in the letter that forced arbitration clauses are now under attack as part of the #MeToo movement.

Still, the question remains whether the Obama administration scrubbed the talking points and used the video red herring in order to cover up the fact that they failed to prevent a planned terrorist attack that killed four Americans on the anniversary of September 11.

At this point, the indications are that Aghdam's attack was the kind of event that has become all too familiar in American society: an isolated act committed by a person with a shaky grip on reality.

Still, some agents said there is lingering resentment over Comey's handling of the Clinton email probe — not necessarily because of the conclusions he drew, but because of the process decisions he made at various points in the investigation that left the bureau vulnerable to partisan attacks.

«It's bigger in functionality, has more sophisticated coding, and it's trickier about hiding,» compared to other recent [point of sale] malware attacks, she said.

For the past year, researchers at iSight Partners, a cybersecurity firm in Dallas, have been tracking a new form of malware, dubbed ModPOS, that attacks point of sale, or POS, machines at the kernel.

The so - called «lag pursuit» when the nose of an attacking plane points at the tail of the opponent's aircraft is considered the optimum location in an aerial fight.

What it's about: «Sargeant York» may have been about World War I — a sharpshooter becomes an unexpected hero after attacking and capturing a German position using the same strategy as turkey hunting — but the American - proud movie became a point of major discussion in the United States over the merits of entering World War II.

Following Sunday's tragedy and the unsurprising response out of Washington, Twitter users were quick to point out the cruel irony of the tired statement: the victims of this latest act of domestic terrorism were in church, literally engaged in prayer, when they were viciously attacked by a white man wielding a legal gun.

Whether protecting systems and customer information from data breaches, thwarting point of sale attacks or malware, or remediating gaps in a company's cyber strategy, we seek truth so clients can find resilience.

In an unprecedented move, President Obama has come right out and accused Russia of being responsible for these pointed cyber attacks and for trying to influence the US Presidential election.

«After this strong rebuke from the Supreme Court of Canada, there is no question that Christy Clark deliberately attacked and undermined public education in British Columbia — even to the point of breaking the law.

While the president attacks 99 percent of his opponents by mercilessly strafing them in speeches, sound bites and tweets (and has a one - size - fits - all approach to firebombing Democrats, disobedient Republicans, Gold Star families, war heroes, etc.), Daniels fends off her online critics with self - deprecating humor, and has made a point of refraining from saying anything bad about the president himself — which has probably kept him from retaliating and going after her personally.

As students marched in Washington, DC, on Saturday, Rubio made no mention of the pointed attacks on him.

Can it be that power corrupts people to the point that — no matter their philosophy — they behave in very similar ways: denial, anger, dictatorship (of business or church), avoidance by attacking, creating enemies for the sake of gaining unity, and each promising to «make American (or Christianity) great again»?

What Hate Mongers fail to point out is that Though a majority of passages from the Qur» an that advocate violence are in response to being attacked first (defending oneself or defending Islam).

Unfortunately, David, some people consider the act of pointing out those advantages to be an attack in and of itself.

Point is that muslim terrorists attacked American people in the name of God.

Martijn Hekman, the Deputy Director of Christian charity World Vision's Syria Response, said: «This deadly attack is a horrific turning point in the conflict, and utterly devastating for thousands of children and their families who were waiting for these supplies to arrive.

Their point though is that the main stream media is attacking MK and her comments about Santa because of an article in the Post praising MK, that the main stream media wants to discredit her and Fox.

That's okay, the people in the time of Jesus would say that they were just pointing out the «difficulties» in Christ's theologies, not attacking him.

For Muslims, that talking point is code for whitewashing decades of atrocities committed against the people of Gaza: the kids killed on the Gaza Beach, the civilians bombed in the most densely populated cage in the world, and the attacking of civilians who resort to donkey carts for transportation.

My point was that if they hadn't charged in here, complaining... attacking... and had followed the procedure Jesus gave us, that there would have been no feeling of having been picked on.

This can be done from many points of view, but I have suggested above that the crucial attack is that which accepts the same data and then shows that the argument does not exclude the presence of contingent elements in God's total nature.

Alfred Neumann in Six of Them tells of a German professor of law who continued teaching in the early days of the Hitler regime, lecturing on justice with pointed reference to its subversion in the Nazi state.36 When fired from his position, the professor, his wife, and a loyal band of students publish secretly copies of his lectures and other material attacking the injustices of the regime.

This was a point of attack for those in SNCC who contended that a movement for racial democracy must itself be radically democratic.

I find it odd that aetheists feel so directly personally offended by Christian symbols... they are not offered as an «attack», unless you see the sharing of beliefs as an attack upon your own beliefs, in which case I think there is a deeper problem... This billboard IS a direct attack, and as many others have pointed out there is a better way to share your belief as an aetheist.

Your point seems to be that — since he didn't act with the full support and assistance of Christian religious leaders — it follows that Muslim terrorists — who call out to Allah as they attack, and who * DO * have the full support and assistance of certain extremist Muslim leaders — shouldn't be presumed to be acting in the name of Islam.

You are welcome to disagree, and you are free to do so in whatever manner you choose; if your response is some type of irrational, hate - driven attack on someone else's way of life, though, you really are contributing more to my point then your own.

A majority of Christians do not believe in creationism so stop using that as an attacking point.

In the third of a century since then, the attacks on moderate evangelicals have come from the fundamentalist right — ask Graham about that — while moderates and liberals have done what moderates and liberals are supposed to do: they say they see some neoevangelical points, and they issue some cease - fires.

The sharp point of his attack is to be found in a parable which reads almost like a declaration of war.

They say that religious people are intolerant of other beliefs and that may be so to a point, on the other hand atheists commit the same «sin» when they attack people who freely choose to believe in something different.

My point in all of this is, everybody has their own beliefs, and i respect that fact... i don't care, i'm not going to attack your religion but i expect the same respect from you... If i don't get it then that is proof to me that you're not a good person....

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

In some cases, as was pointed out in Chapter 10, an absolute right to speak could actually subvert and defeat the democratic process, such as the «right» of an advertiser to misinform the public, or the «right» of a broadcaster to attack someone without allowing an opportunity for that person to replIn some cases, as was pointed out in Chapter 10, an absolute right to speak could actually subvert and defeat the democratic process, such as the «right» of an advertiser to misinform the public, or the «right» of a broadcaster to attack someone without allowing an opportunity for that person to replin Chapter 10, an absolute right to speak could actually subvert and defeat the democratic process, such as the «right» of an advertiser to misinform the public, or the «right» of a broadcaster to attack someone without allowing an opportunity for that person to reply.

A major turning point was Iraq war, during which the group al Qaeda in Iraq staged attacks that killed huge numbers of civilians, tarnishing the al Qaeda brand in eyes of Muslims who had expressed at least tacit support for the organization.

Humility does not prevent us pointing out that Faith has published numerous articles over recent years which have addressed in detail many of the attacks levelled against the Church in the debate.

An essential element in this attack was the critique of «the myth of objective consciousness,» which pointed out the links among the establishment's claims to legitimacy, its tendency to submit to depersonalizing technological forces, and its Enlightenment heritage of scientific authority.

Given the implications of the feminists» attack on nouns, replacing third - person masculine pronouns with their feminine counterparts seems only to point to the final inadequacy of any pronouns used in referring to deity.

Now, Ruddick is extraordinarily careful to write of maternal thinking not as an ontological given but as a hard - won epistemology that emerges from engaging in maternal practices, and she specifically attacks the «idealized Good Mother,» pointing out that many mothers «who live in the Good Mother's shadow... come to feel their lives are riddled with shameful secrets that even the closest friends can't share.»

On the other hand your posts have nothing positive to say, your attack on people and making fun of those who are reaching out to needy kids (case in point this blog) is useless / futile and is helping no cause.

Whether they pray to God, Allah, Krishna, Yahweh, or a shrine to Chuck Norris, there is no point in attacking a day of prayer.

The most uncomprehending comments from the Post were those of columnist Richard Cohen, who denounced Scalia as a «cheap - shot artist» for his attack on the Post's coverage of reported miracles in Virginia, and claimed Scalia was «abusing» the newspaper to make his point that the «worldly wise» are hostile «to religion and religious phenomena.»

True, this anti-Christian faith is coming into action under different names in different parts of the world; but the more these alternative versions of the postwar paganism insist upon their points of difference — the more they abuse and attack one another — the more clearly they betray their kinship with one another to the eyes of the Christian observer.

(Again false as just illustrated above and again attacking me personally rather than my argument) None of these have anything to do with the point of discussion in this thread.