Sentences with phrase «point of my post»

In any case, the main point of both posts is fairly obvious.

«Anyway, my point of posting this was I felt like an idiot for going to the hospital but ultimately, going was the right move!

If you use too many hashtags, you will take away from the main message and point of your post, so use them intelligently.

At any rate, that is not the point of this post.

Which is one of the points of the post.

Third and finally, the traditional story misses the real function of private banks, which is to solve an information problem in the purest Hayekian senses. That is, banks are or should be specialists in risk assessment and risk taking. They should know their client, understand the local market and have their pulse on the broad economy. Arguably, if properly structured, they can and should do this better than other entities such as governments. In other words, the proper role of banks should be underwriting — lend money, hold the debt, and bear the risk. Which is a long - winded way of getting to the main point of this post.

The main point of this post is that while gold is different from other commodities, under the current monetary system the price of gold should never become completely divorced from the prices of other commodities.

The general point of this post was that finding solid dividend growth stocks need not be difficult at all.

I appreciate the difference in duration which is the primary point of this post.

The point of this post is not to debate whether an investment in Amazon is a good idea.

But the point of the post, I think, is $ 500k is not «rich» on the coasts and these people aren't really «keeping up with the Jones» and living a lavish lifestyle.

Not sure what the point of your post is.

What's the point of your post?

I also think that he / she missed the point of the post: these types of stories get embellished every time they are told.

Why can you rarely actually address the point of a post, and instead continually resort to irrelevant bile?

So please tell us what is the point of your post?

Look at the name he chooses to post under for another indication that reflects the point of his posts.

Maybe that's the point of post, Jake.

The whole point of this post is your last sentence but using a bizarre analogy, right?

But I am getting way off subject here, and into dangerous waters, so let me back up to the real point of this post.

It is indeed nonsense, that was the point of his post.

I am not sure whether are you agreeing or disagreeing with the point of the post.

The point of my post was that the two are a combustible combination.

The point of my post is that I was raising a question about your implicit suggestion that his theology lead him to where he is today.

I may be missing the point of your post, but it seems to me that if those things are given to us by God then we are only enslaved by them if we believe we are the means to bring them to pass.

That is the point of the post.

I think I know what you mean as I've stuck around here for awhile, but I think people could easily misunderstand you as well =) I think, the point of your post is to say (I might be wrong!)

No Brigitte: The point of THIS post is that MOST churches don't allow discussion on the abuse of women, but you can find PLENTY that discuss Muslims and Islam.

That was really not the point of my post.

The whole point of my post was to say that many, many such phenomena are dismissed as being some mysterious but material event, when it is clear there is not only a violation of physical laws, but that some kind of intelligence is involve in the violation.

My expertise in evolution is also completely irrelevant to the point of my post.

That's the point of the post.

LOL... thanks for proving the point of my post...

SInce you didn't get the point of my post I'll put it in simple terms.

I think the point of this post, and I may be reading it wrong, is an authentic relationship with God.

I see it as a way to emphasize what you consider to be the main point or points of the post.

In a matter of weeks the objector was gone, but before she left, she made a point of posting the Ben Franklin - attributed quote: «Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security».

The point of the post seems to be that calling oneself a Christian does not a Christian make, nor does it indicate to the world that those who calls themselves Christians follow Jesus and live by his standards.

My point of the post is that people don't know about religion because it has been taken away from us by small minority groups.

Back to the main point of your post, which I think if I understand you right your question is, «Why do atheist come to the * faith * based blog to chat about religion, or in your words, bash religion?

That is the point of this post (if there is a point).

I understood the point of your post, my posts are directed at lutek, who I feel is presenting the other side of this debate.

Your need to hijack the point of this post and talk over everyone on the thread is why the point continues to be relevant.

Maybe if you addressed a particular point of my post, you would start tp learn something.

Then respond to the rest of my post, instead of latching on to one thing in order to avoid the whole point of the post.

I agree, which is partly the point of my post.

Mr. Brown, if i understood correctly the main point of the post is still correct.

And then they quote a verse or ten which they believe disproves the point of my post.

I think you are both misunderstanding the entire point of the post.

Isn't the point of this post about people who would rather dismiss portions of the Bible because it isn't politically correct or appeasing to the palette, so that same logic should be applied to areas that we are struggling with today?