When that doesn't work (because I can explain their errors in their thinking) they begin to corrupt some previously
built points of my argument.
However, there are
many points of argument, including the argument that PSV and MLS never managed a formal bid process and, hence, never provided said opportunity.
By taking the story of Yusuf as a
focal point of my argument, I illustrate how the Prophetic tradition within Islam, notwithstanding the differences, is a means to conceptualise the «Muslim» religious identity in a more cosmopolitan and universal light, with implications for our understanding of religion in relationship with politics, society and even governance.
Mea culpa on using that example, as I've written more extensively here, but at the same time, it doesn't refute the
fundamental point of our argument that customization — or personalization — is needed if we are to help every child reach his or her fullest potential.
In this original, the duel is between a four string banjo played with a pick (an instrument and technique that has disappeared) and a five string banjo, plucked with fingers, a relatively
subtle point of argument.
The
core point of the argument is that the incentive required in the case of TK is not for conservation of lifestyle as stated under the conservationist argument, but for codification of the knowledge.
Even if going to coffee shop, library, or park bench does nothing more than help you memorize the
important points of your argument, that is well worth leaving the office.
According to Mike Hearn in his exit article from the Bitcoin world (which had a monumental impact on the community and signaled the «blowing up»
point of this argument), he initiated the Bitcoin XT hard fork for the following reasons:
The fact that the Bible is silent on how the U.S. and others should deal with Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait is totally beside
the point of my argument, which is urging the development of a Christian political philosophy.
What is
the point of your argument?
the point of the argument above is: you either come to God and to the Bible on their terms or you don't come at all.
And that is
the point of my argument; the standard theological version of process philosophy — Whitehead with God — leads me to ask such questions, leads me to wonder why such senseless, absurd disasters have plagued us at every step of our history, and this counts strongly against the centered version of process metaphysics.
Besides, you missed
the point of this argument.
The crusades (still being used almost 1000 years later as
an point of argument), were the response of Christian Europe to the Islamic conquest of the Middle East, and the forced conversions that took place.
The point of the argument is that God does not change in that manner.
The point of our argument is that neither the settled past nor the relatively indeterminate present can explain the possibility of a new occasion, for the determinate can no more decide or act than can the determinable.
It is even possible that he was not in fact a descendant of David, and
the point of his argument was that this did not disqualify him for the divine choice as Messiah.
I think anyone who likes to look at the issues will disregard the delivery style and look at the merits of
the points of the arguments.
I honestly don't care what you think or say, and this is exactly
the point of my argument.