Sentences with phrase «point of principle in»

The Supreme Court have determined the final appeal in Russell v Transocean International Rescue Ltd [2011] UKSC 57, [2011] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), a test case for the application of the statutory holiday provisions to workers on offshore rigs, which also raised a point of principle in relation to the application of those provisions more widely.

«Very few clients want to establish a point of principle in the tribunal, in the EAT, in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court,» he argues.

Individuals will not always accept decisions or will decide to test a point of principle in court.

Lord Carnwath adds an important concurring judgment discussing the role of the Upper Tribunal in cases giving rise to an important point of principle in a specialist field.

Not exact matches

We are at a point in American history where most people understand this enforcement of marijuana laws has violated our principles and our ideals.»

He said it will become clear by the first week of May whether an agreement in principle is possible this spring, after which point the talks could languish until 2019, while Mexico elects a new president and the U.S. elects a new Congress.

These touch points can be elevated by using the simple, yet often forgotten principles in this book, like the power of a smile.

«If this was a straightforward guide to business success and personal growth,» Harford writes late in the book, «this would be the point at which the author would urge you to use the principles of adapting to gain wealth and success.

Many of our friends and neighbors of all socioeconomic classes have not been exposed enough to fundamental financial principles and to that end we invite you to share this guide with others in your immediate circle and wider communities who may benefit from a refresher on these basic finance points.

In any event, the point isn't whether the requirement to complete the long - form census form violates the charter, I don't think it does because it's probably either a violation «in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rightIn any event, the point isn't whether the requirement to complete the long - form census form violates the charter, I don't think it does because it's probably either a violation «in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rightin accordance with the principles of fundamental justice» (under section 7) or a violation which is «reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rightin a free and democratic society» (the test under section 1), but that it does nevertheless violate the right to privacy which is one of our fundamental rights.

The EC has a specific lever to press the US on this point — in the form of the Privacy Shield arrangement which simplifies the process of authorizing personal data flows between the EU and the US by allowing companies to self - certify their adherence to a set of privacy principles.

«The main idea behind MPT is to use its principles to construct a portfolio that maximizes returns for a certain level of risk...» I would suggest that's the point in all investment strategies.

As a starting point, Glass Lewis is strongly in favour of the «one - share - one - vote» principle.

One of the key principles pointed out was, before investing in a stock, one should always look at stocks as «parts of businesses».

Even this accord between intelligence and intelligible forms seems necessarily to point toward some still - higher, more eminent unity in the simplicity of a first principle — in God.

But to my point that Atheism is a religion by definition Religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith Faith: belief or trust: belief in, devotion to, or trust in somebody or something, especially without proof Atheism: unbelief in God or deities: disbelief in the existence of God or deities

This brings us to Bonhoeffer's second point, which is that truth is always concrete and is never a principle: «The truthfulness of our words that we owe to God must take on concrete form in the world.

You are making it needlessly hard, or are perhaps just plain too stupid to understand such a simple fact as: there's no point debunking myths that virtually no one and no one at all with any real clout believes in anyway, but MUCH point in debunking myths that large numbers of people, including powerful politicians, believe should be the guiding principles for the country's entire political culture and laws.

As we noted in the case of Freudians and Marxists, in the process of studying another figure, for example, Foucault, one may find that one is now understanding and appropriating Jesus from his point of view, that Foucault's insights have become the organizing principles for one's thought and life.

In principle, they thought, if one could know the location and motion of each atom at a particular point in time, one could predict all subsequent eventIn principle, they thought, if one could know the location and motion of each atom at a particular point in time, one could predict all subsequent eventin time, one could predict all subsequent events.

Julie, as you correctly point out, has offered support for her claims, and the principle figures in this mess have answered with nothing more than outright dismissal and disdain for her, and that — at least to my mind — gives the lie to their protestations of innocence, whether before the fact or after.

The same point appears in The Logic of Sense as follows: «disjunction posed as a synthesis exchanges its theological principle for a diabolic principle,» ensuring that «instead of certain number of predicates being excluded from a thing in virtue of the identity of its concept, each «thing» opens itself up to the infinity of predicates through which it passes, as it loses its center, that is, its identity as concept or as self» (LS 176 and 174).

Underlying this erroneous tendency, as Faith has pointed out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial of the transcendence of God, the Divinity of Christ, the historical objectivity of revelation and the authority of the Church in matters of faith and morals, and also the denial of the spiritual soul as a principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity of our human nature.

As Roof points out, their religion affirms: (a) the centrality of ethical principles in their meaning systems; (b) a parsimony of beliefs, few attributions of numinosity; (c) breadth of perspective; (d) piety defined as a personal search for meaning; and (e) license to doubt.

From this point of view, the scholastic principle that there is an essential and eternal difference between God and the world must necessarily result in a denial of the event or the reality of the Incarnation.

Something like this can also be done from the side of the theology of nature, and, as I have indicated, I believe this is the most promising starting point in the «theologies of» because, in principle at least, it is the most inclusive.

Although Balthasar speaks of a mutual indwelling of love between the Petrine and Marian principles (perichoresis), he continuously views the Marian principle as more fundamental because all the various principles, charisms and missions find their embracing point in her.

Therefore, the fetus does not merely tend toward its own maturation, but rather, in order to achieve maturation, in the fullest sense of the term, it has to have an «other,» in this case, the parents, as point of convergence, as principle of unification and integration, as revealer to the child of what it is; and to the degree that the child learns to love with the aid of his parents, to that degree he is differentiated and thus revealed to himself for what he is.

Of course, giving this information in a Catholic school would be wrong on principle, but that is a slightly different point.

In very many instances in actual life the Church had to leave the individual to his own conscience, even though it was neither easy nor sure for the individual to draw from general Christian principles a concrete prescription for a definite course of action at a definite point of space and time in his lifIn very many instances in actual life the Church had to leave the individual to his own conscience, even though it was neither easy nor sure for the individual to draw from general Christian principles a concrete prescription for a definite course of action at a definite point of space and time in his lifin actual life the Church had to leave the individual to his own conscience, even though it was neither easy nor sure for the individual to draw from general Christian principles a concrete prescription for a definite course of action at a definite point of space and time in his lifin his life.

The final point at which the identity of all individuals will be both constituted and revealed is at present only a posit or regulative principle of reason, which we treat as if (in hopes that?)

Bultmann has followed Kant here in making our point of view into a normative and critical principle.

Let us restate the point in terms of a difference between direct and indirect applications of a teleological principle.

19) of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point of departure of the inductive movement is not mere sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.

In order to justifiably assert the universality of the principle in question, it must be seen to apply to a nexus of occasions apart from its original point of originatioIn order to justifiably assert the universality of the principle in question, it must be seen to apply to a nexus of occasions apart from its original point of originatioin question, it must be seen to apply to a nexus of occasions apart from its original point of origination.

Finally, the principle of process is again the reason why Whitehead, in still another place, says: «The point to be noticed is that the actual entity, in a state of process during which it is not fully definite, determines its own ultimate definiteness» (PR 390).

Critics point out further that the new reformers must make a division in principle between the sexual and marital goods of unity and procreation and thereby make licit forms of «baby making» that have, in principle, no connection with «lovemaking.»

Burke recommends that the analysis of any written work should begin with the «principle of the concordance».21 The critic builds an index of significant terms: terms that recur in changing contexts, terms that occur at significant points in the narrative, terms that seem heavy with symbolic meaning.

The point modernist rationalism has to establish, or assume, is that a common secular rationality exists which is capable in principle of resolving the issues that actually divide people.

The point is that, in contrast to Principles, the definition of durations in Process and Reality does not presuppose a conception of «perception.»

Perhaps the most important theological point in this essay is that neoclassical theism, according to its own principles of method, must — given the reality of oppression — join black theology in affirming a certain priority for the conception of God as God of the oppressed.

Such values, while not all present at every point of Old Testament morality, do in fact underlie the bulk of the moral norms and principles we find there.

Although space will not permit exploration of the point here, it is important to note that Christian thought about just war predated the rise of the modern state system in the 17th century, and rests on fundamental moral principles not essentially tied to that system.

Whitehead's reconciliation involved combining the earlier point, that all actualities in the world are occasions of experience, with the idea that God is the chief exemplification, not the exception to, the metaphysical principles applicable to all finite actualities.

To respond: In the first place, we should not exaggerate the difference between Whitehead and Hartshorne on this point, because Whitehead too speaks of «necessity» and defines metaphysical principles as those devoid of conceivable alternatives (PR 3/4, 4/5, 288/441; ESP 123, 124).

Aside from what Gunter has suggested in his essay, I should point out that Deleuze, in his study Bergsonism (13 - 35) devoted a chapter to outlining some of the key principles of «Intuition as Method.»

But there is a further point: the maxim «Like father, like child» holds good here, and it is in the application of this principle that we can recognize an emphasis which is characteristic of the teaching of Jesus.

After describing in some detail the principle of complementarity in physics, Austin suggests that images of God as Father and as Judge are complementary models used to interpret individual and corporate experience.24 The prophet Amos, he points out, interpreted events in Israel's history primarily in terms of God's judgment, while Hosea understood events in terms of God's forgiveness.

The homogeneity of less complex entities is commensurate with continuity, and hence, closer to the being of the élan vital Therefore, we should not be surprised that the simpler a life form is, the more prolific and ubiquitous it is.84 This point brings us to the principle of «metaphysical divisibility» I mentioned above that the more homogeneous a concrete form of existence is, the more divisible it becomes (in the sense that it can be divided without altering its form).

On the other hand, there is capitalism which, in its practical aspect, at the level of its basic principles, would be acceptable from the point of view of the Church's social teaching, since in various ways it is in conformity with the natural law....