The positive feedback would reveal its existence if global temperatures were accelerating to a tipping
point of runaway warming, due to the ever - increasing human CO2 emission releases into the atmosphere,
Not exact matches
This chemical weathering process is too slow to damp out shorter - term fluctuations, and there are some complexities — glaciation can enhance the mechanical erosion that provides surface area for chemical weathering (some
of which may be realized after a time delay — ie when the subsequent
warming occurs — dramatically snow in a Snowball Earth scenario, where the frigid conditions essentially shut down all chemical weathering, allowing CO2 to build up to the
point where it thaws the equatorial region, at which
point runaway albedo feedback drives the Earth into a carbonic acid sauna, which ends via rapid carbonate rock formation), while lower sea level may increase the oxidation
of organic C in sediments but also provide more land surface for erosion... etc..
The United Nations scientific community is
pointing to the overwhelming evidence that global
warming, from increased greenhouse gas emissions, is propelling us towards an irreversible
runaway melting
of the ice caps and northern permafrost while rising temperature cause massive forest fires.
(There are equilibrium climates between the
points where the
runaway starts and where it ends, but they are unstable equilibria, and the equilibrium coverage
of snow / ice increases with forcing that would cause
warming.)
And if we reach just shy
of 3C
warming (or whatever the tipping
point is) by 2100 or 2200 (but do not trigger limited
runaway warming or hysteresis), that by at least 2000 years from now the sea level would have risen about 30M.
Subsequent to the complete collapse
of the Super El Niño phenomenon, the world's oceans have not experienced rapid, dangerous and accelerating global
warming - no tipping
point and
runaway «boiling» seas as predicted by experts
In the past no tipping
point has ever been known to have occurred as a result
of runaway warming from extra water vapour so how have we been persuaded to fear it so much?
Both nations will have to get more aggressive and specific if there is any hope
of keeping global
warming below 2 degrees Celsius, the
point at which climate change will likely become a
runaway feedback loop.
Technology will advance far enough during that time to make the issue
of runaway warming or climate change tipping
points from human greenhouse gas emissions moot historical footnotes.
These tipping
points could be ice sheets on Greenland and Antarctica melting permanently, global food shortages and widespread crop failures with more extreme weather, rising ocean temperatures and acidity reaching triggering a crash in global coral reef ecosystems, and
warming oceans push the release
of methane from the sea floor, which could lead to
runaway climate change, etc..
Of course Ferdinand is right not to project catastrophism onto anthropogenic CO2 levels for as you likely know there is a inverse logarithmic relationship between changes in temperature and CO2 levels such that without the assumed positive feedback from water vapour there is no chance of runaway global warming, tipping points or whateve
Of course Ferdinand is right not to project catastrophism onto anthropogenic CO2 levels for as you likely know there is a inverse logarithmic relationship between changes in temperature and CO2 levels such that without the assumed positive feedback from water vapour there is no chance
of runaway global warming, tipping points or whateve
of runaway global
warming, tipping
points or whatever.
Why
warming is bad What amount (if any) represents a so - called «tipping
point»
of runaway warming?
We are merely re-releasing a tiny portion
of the trapped CO2 that was once part
of the atmosphere and it wasn't too
warm then and we are still in a state
of impoverishment
of atmospheric CO2, yet nitwits preach «
Runaway warming» & «Tipping
Points».
In contrast to the sophisticated climate model predictions
of runaway («tipping
point») global
warming, in reality, real - world global
warming, as measured by satellites, has disappeared for over 16 years despite the gargantuan increases in CO2 emissions... (Ramez Naam denies this)
These satellite measurements
of atmosphere temperatures not only confirm that «
runaway» and / or «tipping
point» global
warming is not happening, they also confirm that the NASA «expert» predictions
of Venus - like
warming that causes «boiling» oceans was, at best, a wild, lunatic, fringe prediction.
The cumulative CO2 growth causes global
warming that accelerates (they hypothesize) to a condition
of «
runaway» temperature increases via positive feedbacks, leading to catastrophic «tipping
point» climate change.
Per the IPCC's global
warming hypothesis, at the very top
of the troposphere, above the equator region, is the location (12 km, 200hPa @ 20 ° N - 20 ° S) that triggers a positive climate feedback, which produces the mythical
runaway, tipping
point of accelerated, dangerous global
warming, which
of course is unequivocal and irrefutable, except when it isn't.
The enduring myth
of «accelerating» is a leftover from earlier IPCC climate reports and the original AGW hypothesis that speculated greater levels
of atmospheric CO2 would generate «
runaway» global
warming leading to a catastrophic «tipping
point» climate change.
«The latest scientific assessments tell us the risks
of crossing critical tipping
points, capable
of triggering
runaway climate change, rise very significantly between 1.5 ˚C and 2 ˚C
warming.
Bottom Line Henry: I am on your side in that I do not think there is any kind
of Global
Warming «tipping point» or «runaway warming» crisis, nor has there be
Warming «tipping
point» or «
runaway warming» crisis, nor has there be
warming» crisis, nor has there been one.
Does this paper not prove, in other words, that we have already crossed the tipping
point into
runaway global
warming, that
warming will continue even if we remove all
of the initial «forcing»
of all future human releases
of carbon into the atmosphere?
Every time there is a «hottest» day, a «
warmest - than - ever» month, or an extended period
of quickly rising global temps, there are many who instantly claim that the world has reached a
runaway climate change condition, or a global
warming tipping
point, or a soon to be doomsday, a no - return cascade turning Earth into the next Venus.
The global
warming catastrophe premise requires that trace Co2 gases produce a positive feedback loop that creates the rapid and
runaway tipping
point of accelerating temperature increase.
None
of the current trends, as
of the end
of September 2017, reveal a significantly high acceleration
of lower atmospheric
warming that would indicate a Venus tipping
point of runaway global
warming is imminent, despite the growing amount
of CO2.
Regarding that last
point, consensus climate science has proposed a hypothesis on the claim that climate physics dictates that rising atmospheric CO2 levels will
warm the atmosphere substantially, thus causing a positive feedback loop, which will then continuously accelerate
warming until a tipping
point of runaway temperatures take place, turning Earth into the next Venus.
But... do the scientific facts and latest empirical evidence indicate that sort
of «
runaway tipping
point» and extreme
warming fate is even remotely possible for Earth in the future?
More importantly, the HC4 temperature dataset verifies what the prior article on the satellite dataset established: despite multiple major
warming El Nino events, and with over 60 %
of all 1850 - 2016 total CO2 emissions being released since 1979, there is absolutely zero indication
of a positive feedback's existence producing a
runaway, «tipping
point»
warming acceleration.
In the case
of Global
Warming, they really thought that we were heading for a «tipping point» that would lead us over the cliff into «runaway warming&
Warming, they really thought that we were heading for a «tipping
point» that would lead us over the cliff into «
runaway warming&
warming».
(1) Alarmists: Like «Chicken Little» who cried «the sky is falling» when he was hit by an acorn falling off a tree, the Alarmists think they are warning and saving the world from a «tipping
point» that will cause «
runaway warming» within a decade or so because
of the coincidence
of a
warming trend and CO2 rise over the past century.